0
TECHNICAL NOTES

Diameter Effects on Nucleate Pool Boiling for a Vertical Tube

[+] Author and Article Information
Myeong-Gie Kang

Department of Mechanical Engineering Education, Andong National University, 388 Songchun-dong, Andong-city, Kyungbuk 760-749, Korea

J. Heat Transfer 123(2), 400-404 (Jul 20, 2000) (5 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1351163 History: Received December 05, 1999; Revised July 20, 2000
Copyright © 2001 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Corletti, M. M., and Hochreiter, L. E., 1991, “Advanced Light Water Reactor Passive Residual Heat Removal Heat Exchanger Test,” Proc. of the 1st JSME/ASME Joint International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 381–387.
Kang,  M. G., 1998, “Experimental Investigation of Tube Length Effect on Nucleate Pool Boiling Heat Transfer,” Ann. Nucl. Energy 25, Nos. 4–5, pp. 295–304.
Cornwell, K., et al., 1982, “The Influence of Diameter on Nucleate Boiling Outside Tubes,” Proc. of the 7th International Heat Transfer Conference, Munchen, Germany, pp. 47–53.
Cornwell,  K., and Houston,  S. D., 1994, “Nucleate Pool Boiling on Horizontal Tubes: A Convection-Based Correlation,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 37, Suppl. 1, pp. 303–309.
Chun,  M. H., and Kang,  M. G., 1998, “Effects of Heat Exchanger Tube Parameters on Nucleate Pool Boiling Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 120, pp. 468–476.
van Stralen,  S. J. D., and Sluyter,  W. M., 1969, “Investigations on the Critical Heat Flux of Pure Liquids and Mixtures under Various Conditions,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 12, pp. 1353–1384.
Hahne, E., and Feurstein, G., 1977, “Heat Transfer in pool Boiling in the Thermodynamic Critical Region: Effect of Pressure and Geometry,” in Heat Transfer in Boiling, E. Hahne and U. Grigull, eds., chap. 8, pp. 159–206.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Schematic Diagram of the experimental apparatus (a) overall arrangement; (b) water storage tank and heated tube
Grahic Jump Location
hbc/hb versus H to include tube length effect
Grahic Jump Location
The corrected heat transfer coefficient versus wall superheat for various vertical tubes with different surface roughness: (a) smooth surface (ε = 15.1 nm); (b) rough surface (ε = 60.9 nm)
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of the present experimental data for vertical tubes with Cornwell and Houston’s empirical correlation
Grahic Jump Location
Calculated heat transfer coefficient versus measured heat transfer coefficient for vertical tubes

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In