Geometry Effects on Turbulent Flow and Heat Transfer in Internally Finned Tubes

Xiaoyue Liu; Michael K. Jensen

doi:10.1115/1.1409267

Journal of Heat Transfer | Volume 123 | Issue 6 | TECHNICAL PAPERS

< Previous Article Next Article >

TECHNICAL PAPERS: Forced Convection

Geometry Effects on Turbulent Flow and Heat Transfer in Internally Finned Tubes

Xiaoyue Liu, Mem. ASME, Mechanical Engineer and Michael K. Jensen, Fellow ASME, Professor

[+] Author and Article Information

Xiaoyue Liu

GE Corporate Research and Development Center, 1 Research Circle, Niskayuna, NY 12309e-mail: LiuXi@crd.ge.com

Michael K. Jensen

Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590e-mail: JenseM@rpi.edu

J. Heat Transfer 123(6), 1035-1044 (May 20, 2001) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1409267 History: Received December 15, 2000; Revised May 20, 2001

Article

References

Figures

Tables

Citing Articles

Purchase this Content

$25.00

Purchase

Learn about subscription and purchase options

Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

(a) The comparison of the predicted friction factors with experimental data for Fin 1; and (b) the comparison of the predicted Nusselt numbers with experimental data for Fin 1.

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

(a) The effect of helix angle and number of fins on friction factors; and (b) the effect of helix angle and number of fins on Nusselt numbers.

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

(a) The effect of fin height on friction factors (N=30); and (b) the effect of fin height on Nusselt numbers (N=30).

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

(a) The local friction factor distribution for a rectangular fin (N=36,H=0.06,γ=25 deg, and s=0.1); and (b) the local Nusselt number distribution for a rectangular fin (N=36,H=0.06,γ=25 deg, and s=0.1).

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

(a) The comparison of fin width effect on friction factor with different number of fins; and (b) the comparison of fin width effect on Nusselt number with different number of fins.

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

(a) The turbulent kinetic energy on the interfin bisector for (N=22,H=0.06, and γ=25 deg); and (b) the turbulent kinetic energy on the interfin bisector for (N=36,H=0.06, and γ=25 deg).

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

(a) The friction factor comparison for different fin profiles (N=30,H=0.10,γ=30 deg, and s=0.083); and (b) the Nusselt number comparison for different fin profiles (N=30,H=0.10,γ=30 deg, and s=0.083).

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

(a) The local friction factor distribution for the round crest fin profile; and (b) the local Nusselt number distribution for the round-crest fin profile.

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

(a) The friction factor comparison for different fin profiles (N=36,H=0.06,γ=25 deg, and s=0.1); and (b) the Nusselt number comparison for different fin profiles (N=36,H=0.06,γ=25 deg, and s=0.1).

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Web of Science® Times Cited: 28

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

PDF
Email

You must be logged in as an individual user to share content.

Return to: Geometry Effects on Turbulent Flow and Heat Transfer in Internally Finned Tubes

Copyright in the material you requested is held by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (unless otherwise noted). This email ability is provided as a courtesy, and by using it you agree that you are requesting the material solely for personal, non-commercial use, and that it is subject to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Terms of Use. The information provided in order to email this topic will not be used to send unsolicited email, nor will it be furnished to third parties. Please refer to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Privacy Policy for further information.
Share
Get Citation

Liu X, Jensen MK. Geometry Effects on Turbulent Flow and Heat Transfer in Internally Finned Tubes. ASME. J. Heat Transfer. 2001;123(6):1035-1044. doi:10.1115/1.1409267.

Download citation file:

RIS (Zotero)

EndNote

BibTex

Medlars

ProCite

RefWorks

Reference Manager

© Copyright
Get Alerts

Processing your request... Please Wait.

Geometry Effects on Turbulent Flow and Heat Transfer in Internally Finned Tubes

References

Figures

The geometry of an internally finned tube

Three fin profiles

A computational model of an internally finned tube

(a) The comparison of the predicted friction factors with experimental data for Fin 1; and (b) the comparison of the predicted Nusselt numbers with experimental data for Fin 1.

(a) The effect of helix angle and number of fins on friction factors; and (b) the effect of helix angle and number of fins on Nusselt numbers.

(a) The effect of fin height on friction factors (N=30); and (b) the effect of fin height on Nusselt numbers (N=30).

(a) The local friction factor distribution for a rectangular fin (N=36,H=0.06,γ=25 deg, and s=0.1); and (b) the local Nusselt number distribution for a rectangular fin (N=36,H=0.06,γ=25 deg, and s=0.1).

(a) The comparison of fin width effect on friction factor with different number of fins; and (b) the comparison of fin width effect on Nusselt number with different number of fins.

(a) The turbulent kinetic energy on the interfin bisector for (N=22,H=0.06, and γ=25 deg); and (b) the turbulent kinetic energy on the interfin bisector for (N=36,H=0.06, and γ=25 deg).

(a) The friction factor comparison for different fin profiles (N=30,H=0.10,γ=30 deg, and s=0.083); and (b) the Nusselt number comparison for different fin profiles (N=30,H=0.10,γ=30 deg, and s=0.083).

(a) The local friction factor distribution for the round crest fin profile; and (b) the local Nusselt number distribution for the round-crest fin profile.

(a) The friction factor comparison for different fin profiles (N=36,H=0.06,γ=25 deg, and s=0.1); and (b) the Nusselt number comparison for different fin profiles (N=36,H=0.06,γ=25 deg, and s=0.1).

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Related Content

Journals

Conference Proceedings

eBooks