0
TECHNICAL PAPERS: Conduction

Theoretical Prediction of the Soil Thermal Conductivity at Moderately High Temperatures

[+] Author and Article Information
Fabio Gori, Sandra Corasaniti

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” Via di Tor Vergata, 110, Rome, 00133, Italy

J. Heat Transfer 124(6), 1001-1008 (Dec 03, 2002) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1513573 History: Received July 20, 2001; Revised May 17, 2002; Online December 03, 2002
Copyright © 2002 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
(a) Cubic cell for two-phases dry soil; (b) cubic cell for three-phases soil at low water content; (c) cubic cell for three-phases soil in unsaturated conditions; and (d) cubic cell for three-phases soil near saturation conditions
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Effective thermal conductivity versus water content in L-soil 3; (b) effective thermal conductivity versus water content in L-soil 3; (c) Effective thermal conductivity versus water content in L-soil 3; and (d) effective thermal conductivity versus water content in L-soil 3
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Effective thermal conductivity versus water content in Royal soil 3; (b) effective thermal conductivity versus water content in Royal soil 3; (c) Effective thermal conductivity versus water content in Royal soil 3; and (d) Effective thermal conductivity versus water content in Royal soil 3
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Effective thermal conductivity versus water content in Palouse A 3; (b) effective thermal conductivity versus water content in Palouse A 3; (c) effective thermal conductivity versus water content in Palouse A 3; and (d) effective thermal conductivity versus water content in Palouse A 3
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Effective thermal conductivity versus water content in Salkum 3; (b) effective thermal conductivity versus water content in Salkum 3; (c) effective thermal conductivity versus water content in Salkum 3; and (d) effective thermal conductivity versus water content in Salkum 3
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Effective thermal conductivity versus water content in Palouse B 3; (b) effective thermal conductivity versus water content in Palouse B 3; (c) effective thermal conductivity versus water content in Palouse B 3; and (d) effective thermal conductivity versus water content in Palouse B 3.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In