0
TECHNICAL PAPERS: Natural and Mixed Convection

Heat Transfer From an Isothermal Vertical Surface With Adjacent Heated Horizontal Louvers: Validation

[+] Author and Article Information
M. Collins

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada

S. J. Harrison, P. H. Oosthuizen

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada

D. Naylor

Dept. of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Industrial Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario M5B 2K3, Canada

J. Heat Transfer 124(6), 1078-1087 (Dec 03, 2002) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1481358 History: Received June 18, 2001; Revised March 07, 2002; Online December 03, 2002
Copyright © 2002 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
System geometry (left) and photo (right)
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic of isothermal plate (back cover removed for clarity)
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of infinite fringe (left) and wedge fringe (right) interferograms
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of isotherms for all cases. Interferometric (left) and numerical (right).
Grahic Jump Location
Convective heat flux for validation case 1: b=15.4 mm,ϕ=0 deg,Tp=283 K. Points represent interferometric results with associated experimental uncertainty. Solid line represents numerical results. Slat positions are superimposed on graphs for clarity.
Grahic Jump Location
Convective heat flux for validation case 2: b=15.4 mm,ϕ=0 deg,Tp=298 K. Points represent interferometric results with associated experimental uncertainty. Solid line represents numerical results. Slat positions are superimposed on graphs for clarity.
Grahic Jump Location
Convective heat flux for validation case 3: b=20.0 mm,ϕ=0 deg,Tp=283 K. Points represent interferometric results with associated experimental uncertainty. Solid line represents numerical results. Slat positions are superimposed on graphs for clarity.
Grahic Jump Location
Convective heat flux for validation case 4: b=20.0 mm,ϕ=0 deg,Tp=298 K. Points represent interferometric results with associated experimental uncertainty. Solid line represents numerical results. Slat positions are superimposed on graphs for clarity.
Grahic Jump Location
Convective heat flux for validation case 5: b=20.0  mm,ϕ=45 deg,Tp=283 K. Points represent interferometric results with associated experimental uncertainty. Solid line represents numerical results. Slat positions are superimposed on graphs for clarity.
Grahic Jump Location
Convective heat flux for validation case 6: b=20.0 mm,ϕ=45 deg,Tp=298 K. Points represent interferometric results with associated experimental uncertainty. Solid line represents numerical results. Slat positions are superimposed on graphs for clarity.
Grahic Jump Location
Convective heat flux for validation case 7: b=20.0 mm,ϕ=−45 deg,Tp=283 K. Points represent interferometric results with associated experimental uncertainty. Solid line represents numerical results. Slat positions are superimposed on graphs for clarity.
Grahic Jump Location
Convective heat flux for validation case 8: b=20.0 mm,ϕ=−45 deg,Tp=298 K. Points represent interferometric results with associated experimental uncertainty. Solid line represents numerical results. Slat positions are superimposed on graphs for clarity.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In