0
TECHNICAL PAPERS: Jets, Wakes, and Impingement Cooling

Mist/Steam Heat Transfer With Jet Impingement Onto a Concave Surface

[+] Author and Article Information
Xianchang Li, Ting Wang

Energy Conversion and Conservation Center, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148-2220

J. Leo Gaddis

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0921

J. Heat Transfer 125(3), 438-446 (May 20, 2003) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1561813 History: Received May 28, 2002; Revised November 12, 2002; Online May 20, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Schematic diagram of experimental system
Grahic Jump Location
Details of test section
Grahic Jump Location
Heat transfer results at Re=7500 with q=3350 W/m2 and ml/ms=∼0.5 %: (a) wall temperature; (b) heat transfer coefficient; and (c) ratio of heat transfer coefficient.
Grahic Jump Location
Heat transfer results at Re=7500 with q=7540 W/m2 and ml/ms=∼0.5 %: (a) wall temperature; (b) heat transfer coefficient; and (c) ratio of heat transfer coefficient.
Grahic Jump Location
Heat transfer results in Nusselt number over a concave surface
Grahic Jump Location
Heat transfer results for mist/steam slot jet impingement on a flat surface at (Re=14,000 and ml/ms=∼1.5 %)
Grahic Jump Location
Heat transfer results for mist/steam slot jet impingement on a flat surface (Re=7500 and ml/ms=∼3.5 %)
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of heat transfer enhancement for flat and concave target surfaces at Re=22,500 (ml/ms=1.5 % for flat case and ml/ms=0.5 % for curved case). The enhancement is normalized by the value at the stagnation point.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of heat transfer enhancement for flat and concave target surfaces at Re=7500 (ml/ms=1.5 % for flat case and ml/ms=0.5 % for curved case). The enhancement is normalized by the value at the stagnation point.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of steam alone stagnation heat transfer on concaved surface with flat plate correlation. Two heat fluxes are applied for each Reynolds number.
Grahic Jump Location
Heat transfer results for Re=22,500 at various heat fluxes
Grahic Jump Location
Heat transfer results at Re=15,000 with q=20900 W/m2 and ml/ms=∼0.5 %: (a) wall temperature; (b) heat transfer coefficient; and (c) ratio of heat transfer coefficient.
Grahic Jump Location
Heat transfer results at Re=15,000 with q=13400 W/m2 and ml/ms=∼0.5 %: (a) wall temperature; (b) heat transfer coefficient; and (c) ratio of heat transfer coefficient.
Grahic Jump Location
Heat transfer results at Re=15,000 with q=7540 W/m2 and ml/ms=∼0.5 %: (a) wall temperature; (b) heat transfer coefficient; and (c) ratio of heat transfer coefficient.
Grahic Jump Location
Heat transfer results at Re=7500 with q=13400 W/m2 and ml/ms=∼0.5 %: (a) wall temperature; (b) heat transfer coefficient; and (c) ratio of heat transfer coefficient.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In