0
RESEARCH PAPER

Nano-Scale Machining Via Electron Beam and Laser Processing

[+] Author and Article Information
Basil T. Wong, M. Pinar Mengüç

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kentucky, 151RGAN Building, Lexington, KY 40506

R. Ryan Vallance

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The George Washington University, 738 Academic Center, 801 22nd St., N.W., Washington, DC 20052

J. Heat Transfer 126(4), 566-576 (May 12, 2004) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1777581 History: Received January 21, 2003; Revised May 12, 2004
Copyright © 2004 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Vallance, R. R., Rao, A. M., and Menguc, M. P., 2003, “Processes for Nanomachining Using Carbon Nanotubes,” U.S. Patent No. 6,660,959, issued to University of Kentucky Research Foundation, Lexington, KY.
Taniguchi, N., Ikeda, M., Miyamoto, I., and Miyazaki, T., 1989, Energy-Beam Processing of Materials: Advanced Manufacturing Using Various Energy Sources, Oxford University Press, New York.
Wong,  B. T., and Mengüç,  M. P., 2004, “Monte Carlo Methods in Radiative Transfer and Electron-Beam Processing,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf., 84, pp. 437–450.
Wong, B. T., and Mengüç, M. P., 2003, “Electronic Thermal Conduction in Thin Gold Films,” ASME Summer Heat Transfer Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, Paper No. 47172.
Archard,  G. D., 1961, “Back Scattering of Electrons,” J. Appl. Phys., 32(8), pp. 1505–1509.
Kanaya,  K., and Okayama,  S., 1972, “Penetration and Energy-Loss Theory of Electrons in Solid Targets,” J. Phys. D, 5, pp. 43–58.
Whiddington,  R., 1912, “The Transmission of Cathode Rays Through Matter,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, 86(588), pp. 360–370.
Trinkle, C. A., Vallance, R. R., Mengüç, M. P., Bah, A., Javed, K., Rao, A. M., and Jin, S., 2002, “Nanoprobe Concepts for Field Emission Nanomachining,” Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Precision Engineering, St. Louis, MO.
Wong,  B. T., and Mengüç,  M. P., 2002, “Comparison of Monte Carlo Techniques to Predict the Propagation of a Collimated Beam in Participating Media,” Numer. Heat Transfer, Part B, 42, pp. 119–140.
Joy, D. C., 1995, Monte Carlo Modeling for Electron Microscopy and Microanalysis, Oxford University Press, New York.
Murata,  K., Matsukawa,  T., and Shimizu,  R., 1971, “Monte Carlo Calculations on Electron Scattering in a Solid Target,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 10(6), pp. 678–686.
Shimizu,  R., Ikuta,  T., and Murata,  K., 1972, “The Monte Carlo Technique as Applied to the Fundamentals of Epma and Sem,” J. Appl. Phys., 43, pp. 4233–4249.
Newbury, D. E., and Myklebust, R. L., 1981, Analytical Electron Microscopy, R. H. Geiss eds., San Francisco Press, San Francisco, pp. 91.
Czyzewski,  Z., MacCalium,  D. O. N., Romig,  A., and Joy,  D. C., 1990, “Calculations of Mott Scattering Cross Section,” J. Appl. Phys., 68(7), pp. 3066–3072.
Luo,  S. C., Zhang,  X., and Joy,  D. C., 1991, “Experimental Determinations of Electron Stopping Power at Low Energies,” Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids, 117, pp. 235–242.
Joy, D. C., “A Database of Electron-Solid Interactions,” http://web.utk.edu/∼srcutk/.
Hecht, E., 1998, Optics, Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Modest, M. F., 1993, Radiative Heat Transfer, McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Palik, E. D., 1985, Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, Academic Press, New York.
Majumdar, A., 1998, “Microscale Energy Transport in Solids,” Microscale Energy Transport, C. L. Tien eds., Begell House, New York, pp. 1–93.
Cahill,  D. G., Ford,  W. K., Goodson,  K. E., Mahan,  G. D., Majumdar,  A., Maris,  H. J., Merlin,  R., and Phillpot,  S. R., 2003, “Nanoscale Thermal Transport,” Applied Physics Reviews,93(2), pp. 793–818.
Ashcroft, N. W., and Mermin, N. D., 1976, Solid State Physics, Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA.
Tzou, D. Y., 1997, Macro- to Microscale Heat Transfer, Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC.
Incropera, F. P., and DeWitt, D. P., 1996, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Matthews, J. H., and Fink, K. D., 1999, Numerical Methods Using Matlab, Prentice Hall, Inc., New Jersey.
Jacques, S. L., and Wang, L., 1995, “Monte Carlo Modeling of Light Transport in Tissues,” Optical-Thermal Response of Laser-Irradiated Tissue, Welch and V. Gemert eds., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 73–100.
Ding,  Z. J., and Shimizu,  R., 1996, “A Monte Carlo Modeling of Electron Interaction With Solids Including Cascade Secondary Electron Production,” Scanning, 18, pp. 92–113.
Hohlfeld,  J., Wellershoff,  S.-S., Güdde,  J., Conrad,  U., Jähnke,  V., and Matthias,  E., 2000, “Electron and Lattice Dynamics Following Optical Excitation of Metals,” Chem. Phys., 251, pp. 237–258.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Schematic for the nano-scale machining process considered. A workpiece is positioned on top of a substrate. The substrate is assumed transparent to the incident laser. Two different evaporation methods are considered: (a) electron-beam impinges perpendicularly on the top of the workpiece, and (b) electron-beam and laser impinge normally on the workpiece at opposite directions.
Grahic Jump Location
The grid setup used in modeling the electron-beam transport, the laser propagation, and the heat conduction inside the workpiece. The grid is sub-divided into two zones: (1) A and B with uniform spacings in both r and z-directions, and (2) C and D with non-uniform spacings where the grid is stretched along r and z-directions with independent factors. A is where the MC simulation in the electron-beam transport is performed while B extends A uniformly in both r and z-directions in order to account for the laser heating. The boundary conditions are (a) adiabatic at r=0 due to symmetry and (b) adiabatic at r=R1+R2+R3,z=0 and z=L1+L2+L3 since it is assumed that there are no convection and radiation losses.
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic for the radiative transfer inside the workpiece. The impinging laser has a radial dimension of Rlaser and a wavelength of 355 nm. Since the absorption of radiant energy in a metal is strong, a one-dimensional radiation model with exponential decaying of radiant energy in the direction of propagation is employed; scattering of photons is neglected. The complex index of refraction of gold is at the wavelength of the laser. Rs→w is the reflectivity at the interface between gold and quartz when the incident direction is from quartz to gold.
Grahic Jump Location
Normalized electron energy Ψ×109 (nm−3) (see Eq. (11)) deposited inside gold film Results are obtained from the Monte Carlo simulation in the electron-beam transport. The incident beam has a Gaussian profile in the r-direction with (a) a 1/e2 radius of Relectron=100 nm and the initial kinetic energy of E0=4 keV, (b) Relectron=50 nm and E0=4 keV, and (c) Relectron=100 nm and E0=6 keV.
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Temperature distribution (K) within gold film at t=0.9 ns. The electron-beam impinges on the top of workpiece (i.e., z=0). A Gaussian beam profile is considered with a 1/e2 radius of Relectron=100 nm and an initial kinetic energy of E0=4 keV. The power of the beam is set to Ė=0.5 W. The Δt used in the simulation is 0.005 ps. The thicknesses of the workpiece and the substrate, which are gold and quartz, are assumed to be 500 nm and 10 μm, respectively. In the figure there is a sharp bending for the isothermal lines at z=500 nm, which is where the interface of the two different materials. Note that this is the snapshot of the temperature field right at the moment when the first computational element nearest the origin overcomes the latent heat of evaporation and starts to evaporate. The small inset in top right-hand corner portrays an up-close temperature field for an area of (r×z)=(120 nm×120 nm) near the origin. (b) Temperature distribution (K) within gold at t=0.7 ns using the same conditions in (a) except that Relectron=50 nm,E0=4 keV, and Ė=0.305 W. (c) Temperature distribution (K) within gold at t=1.0 ns using the same conditions in (a) but with Relectron=100 nm,E0=6 keV, and Ė=0.615 W.
Grahic Jump Location
Temperature distribution (K) within gold film at t=0.5 ns. Both the electron-beam and the laser are considered. The input parameters are the same as those in Fig. 5(a). The power of the laser is 1.5 W and it covers a radius of Rlaser=300 nm from the z-axis. With the assistance from the laser, the time required for the first element at the origin to evaporate is improved from t=0.9 ns (as in Fig. 5(a)) to 0.5 ns.
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Temperature distribution (K) within gold at t=1 ns. Both the electron-beam and the laser heating are considered. The thickness of gold film is reduced to 200 nm and the power of the electron-beam is set to 0.25 W. The rest of the input parameters follow those given in Fig. 6(b). The time required for evaporation as a function of the input power from the electron-beam for the 200-nm gold film.
Grahic Jump Location
Transient temperatures at the origin around an infinitesimal area with radius of Δr=1.25 nm and depth of Δz=1.25 nm. The first case is set as the reference at which the inputs for the electron-beam are Relectron=100 nm,E0=4 keV and Ė=0.5 W. The gold film thickness is assumed to be 500 nm. The second has the same inputs as the reference except that the beam is focused narrower with Relectron=50 nm. The third is the same as the first case but with laser heating. The power of the laser used is 1.5 W. The fourth has a gold film thickness of 200 nm while the rest of the inputs are the same as the third case. The electron-beam of the final case has Relectron=100 nm,E0=6 keV and Ė=0.615 W with the laser turned off.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In