Wall Heat Flux Partitioning During Subcooled Flow Boiling: Part II—Model Validation

Nilanjana Basu; Gopinath R. Warrier; Vijay K. Dhir

doi:10.1115/1.1842785

Journal of Heat Transfer | Volume 127 | Issue 2 | Research Paper

< Previous Article Next Article >

RESEARCH PAPER

Wall Heat Flux Partitioning During Subcooled Flow Boiling: Part II—Model Validation

Nilanjana Basu, Gopinath R. Warrier and Vijay K. Dhir

[+] Author and Article Information

Nilanjana Basu, Gopinath R. Warrier, Vijay K. Dhir

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1597

J. Heat Transfer 127(2), 141-148 (Mar 15, 2005) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1842785 History: Received December 12, 2003; Revised August 31, 2004; Online March 15, 2005

Article

References

Figures

Citing Articles

Purchase this Content

$25.00

Purchase

Learn about subscription and purchase options

Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Basu, N., Warrier, G. R., and Dhir, V. K., 2005, “Wall Heat Flux Partitioning During Subcooled Flow Boiling—Part I: Model Development,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 127(2), pp. 131–140.

Basu, N., 2003, “Modeling and Experiments for Wall Heat Flux Partitioning During Subcooled Flow Boiling of Water at Low Pressures,” Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.

Basu, N., Warrier, G. R., and Dhir, V. K., 2002, “Onset of Nucleate Boiling and Active Nucleation Site Density During Subcooled Flow Boiling,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 124(4), 717–728.

Bergles, A. E., and Rohsenow, W. M., 1964, “The Determination of Forced Convective Surface Boiling Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 86, 365–372.

McAdams, W. H., 1954, Heat Transmission, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Morozov, V. G., 1969, “Convective Heat Transfer in Two Phase Flow,” V. M. Borishannskii and I. I. Paleev, eds., Israel Program for Scientific Transactions.

Hodgson, A. S., 1966, “Forced Convection, Subcooled Boiling in Water,” Ph.D. thesis, University of London, London.

Rohsenow, A. E., and Clark, J. A., 1951, “Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop Data for High Heat Flux Densities to Water at High Subcritical Pressure,” Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

Lahey, R. T., 1978, “A Mechanistic Subcooled Boiling Model,” Proceedings of the 6th International Heat Transfer Conference, pp. 293–297.

Dittus, W. F., and Boelter, L. M. K., 1930, University of California Publications on Engineering, Vol. 2, p. 443, Berkeley, CA.

Figures

Comparison between the present model and Lahey’s 9 model

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Predicted q_tc and q_fc components of wall heat flux for two different flow rates for the flat plate test case

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Predicted q_ev and q_l components of wall heat flux for two different flow rates for the flat plate test case

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Predicted boiling curve for the flat plate test case

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Predicted q_tc and q_fc components of wall heat flux for a constant wall heat flux for the rod bundle test case

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Predicted q_ev and q_l components of wall heat flux for a constant wall heat flux for the rod bundle test case

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Predicted wall temperature profile for the rod bundle test case

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Comparison of predicted wall heat flux with experimental value from present study

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Tables

Errata

Web of Science® Times Cited: 28

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sections
PDF
Email

You must be logged in as an individual user to share content.

Return to: Wall Heat Flux Partitioning During Subcooled Flow Boiling: Part II—Model Validation

Copyright in the material you requested is held by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (unless otherwise noted). This email ability is provided as a courtesy, and by using it you agree that you are requesting the material solely for personal, non-commercial use, and that it is subject to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Terms of Use. The information provided in order to email this topic will not be used to send unsolicited email, nor will it be furnished to third parties. Please refer to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Privacy Policy for further information.
Share
Get Citation

Basu N, Warrier GR, Dhir VK. Wall Heat Flux Partitioning During Subcooled Flow Boiling: Part II—Model Validation. ASME. J. Heat Transfer. 2005;127(2):141-148. doi:10.1115/1.1842785.

Download citation file:

RIS (Zotero)

EndNote

BibTex

Medlars

ProCite

RefWorks

Reference Manager

© Copyright
Get Alerts

Processing your request... Please Wait.

Wall Heat Flux Partitioning During Subcooled Flow Boiling: Part II—Model Validation

References

Figures

Comparison between the present model and Lahey’s 9 model

Predicted q_tc and q_fc components of wall heat flux for two different flow rates for the flat plate test case

Predicted q_ev and q_l components of wall heat flux for two different flow rates for the flat plate test case

Predicted boiling curve for the flat plate test case

Predicted q_tc and q_fc components of wall heat flux for a constant wall heat flux for the rod bundle test case

Predicted q_ev and q_l components of wall heat flux for a constant wall heat flux for the rod bundle test case

Predicted wall temperature profile for the rod bundle test case

Comparison of predicted wall heat flux with experimental value from present study

Boiling curve comparison with McAdams’s 5 data

Boiling curve comparisons for Morozov’s 6 data

Wall superheat prediction for Hodgson’s 7 data

Application of model to data available in the literature

Flowchart showing the sequence of calculations

Tables

Errata

Related Content

Journals

Conference Proceedings

eBooks

Wall Heat Flux Partitioning During Subcooled Flow Boiling: Part II—Model Validation

References

Figures

Comparison between the present model and Lahey’s 9 model

Predicted qtc and qfc components of wall heat flux for two different flow rates for the flat plate test case

Predicted qev and ql components of wall heat flux for two different flow rates for the flat plate test case

Predicted boiling curve for the flat plate test case

Predicted qtc and qfc components of wall heat flux for a constant wall heat flux for the rod bundle test case

Predicted qev and ql components of wall heat flux for a constant wall heat flux for the rod bundle test case

Predicted wall temperature profile for the rod bundle test case

Comparison of predicted wall heat flux with experimental value from present study

Boiling curve comparison with McAdams’s 5 data

Boiling curve comparisons for Morozov’s 6 data

Wall superheat prediction for Hodgson’s 7 data

Application of model to data available in the literature

Flowchart showing the sequence of calculations

Tables

Errata

Related Content

Journals

Conference Proceedings

eBooks

Predicted q_tc and q_fc components of wall heat flux for two different flow rates for the flat plate test case

Predicted q_ev and q_l components of wall heat flux for two different flow rates for the flat plate test case

Predicted q_tc and q_fc components of wall heat flux for a constant wall heat flux for the rod bundle test case

Predicted q_ev and q_l components of wall heat flux for a constant wall heat flux for the rod bundle test case