0
TECHNICAL PAPERS: Evaporative Boiling and Condensation

Flow Visualization and Flow Pattern Identification With Power Spectral Density Distributions of Pressure Traces During Refrigerant Condensation in Smooth and Microfin Tubes

[+] Author and Article Information
Leon Liebenberg, Josua P. Meyer

Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa

John R. Thome

Laboratory of Heat and Mass Transfer, Faculty of Engineering Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology-Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne 1015, Switzerland

J. Heat Transfer 127(3), 209-220 (Mar 24, 2005) (12 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1857942 History: Received November 07, 2003; Revised September 19, 2004; Online March 24, 2005
Copyright © 2005 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Experimental setup: (a) subsection of test condenser and (b) entire system
Grahic Jump Location
Sample wall pressure (gauge pressure) traces for condensing R-407C in a smooth tube
Grahic Jump Location
Experimental data plotted with Thome 89 flow regime transitions for condensing R-407C in a smooth tube at 40°C
Grahic Jump Location
Video images of condensing R-134a at 300, 500, and 800 kg/m2  s in a smooth tube, superimposed on the flow transitions of the Thome et al. 89 map. Mass flux (300, 500, and 800 kg/m2  s) is plotted against vapor quality.
Grahic Jump Location
Flow observations at 500 kg/m2  s for condensing R-22 inside (a) a smooth tube, and microfin tubes with varying helix angles: (b) 10°, (c) 18°, and (d) 37°
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Void fraction versus average vapor quality for all three microfin tubes for condensing R-407C (condensing R-134a and R-22 showed near-identical trends, and are therefore not shown here); (b) Comparison of smooth-tube and 18° microfin tube void fractions versus Froude rate parameters. The transitional Froude numbers were calculated by plotting the local heat transfer coefficients against the Froude numbers, as reported in Liebenberg 15.
Grahic Jump Location
Martinelli parameter (Xtt) versus Froude rate parameter for R22, R-407C, and R-134a condensing in the three test microfin tubes (10, 18, and 37-helix angles)
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of experimental Thome et al. flow pattern transitions in a smooth tube, versus those in microfin tubes with condensing R-22, R-407C, and R-134a
Grahic Jump Location
Summary of typical PSD distributions (versus harmonic frequency) for the different observed flow regimes in the smooth tube (for 500 kg/m2  s, for all three refrigerants). Arrows indicate flow directions.
Grahic Jump Location
Summary of typical PSD distributions (versus harming frequency) for the different observed flow regimes in the three microfin tubes for all three the tested refrigerants. Horizontal arrows show flow directions.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In