0
RESEARCH PAPERS: Bubbles, Particles and Droplets

The Thickness of the Liquid Microlayer Between a Cap-Shaped Sliding Bubble and a Heated Wall: Experimental Measurements

[+] Author and Article Information
Xin Li, D. Keith Hollingsworth, Larry C. Witte

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-4006

J. Heat Transfer 128(9), 934-944 (Feb 03, 2006) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2241858 History: Received September 13, 2005; Revised February 03, 2006

A laser-based method has been developed to measure the thickness of the liquid microlayer between a cap-shaped sliding bubble and an inclined heated wall. Sliding vapor bubbles are known to create high heat transfer coefficients along the surfaces against which they slide. The details of this process remain unclear and depend on the evolution of the microlayer that forms between the bubble and the surface. Past experiments have used heat transfer measurements on uniform-heat-generation surfaces to infer the microlayer thickness through an energy balance. These studies have produced measurements of 20–100 μm for refrigerants and for water, but they have yet to be confirmed by a direct measurement that does not depend on a first-law closure. The results presented here are direct measurements of the microlayer thickness made from a reflectance-based fiber-optic laser probe. Details of the construction and calibration of the probe are presented. Data for saturated FC-87 and a uniform-temperature surface inclined at 2 deg to 15 deg from the horizontal are reported. Millimeter-sized spherical bubbles of FC-87 vapor were injected near the lower end of a uniformly heated aluminum plate. The laser probe yielded microlayer thicknesses of 22–55 μm for cap-shaped bubbles. Bubble Reynolds numbers range from 600 to 4800, Froude numbers from 0.9 to 1.7, and Weber numbers from 2.6 to 47. The microlayer thickness above cap-shaped bubbles was correlated to a function of inclination angle and a bubble shape factor. The successful correlation suggests that this data set can be used to validate the results of detailed models of the microlayer dynamics.

Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Image collage from Bayazit (16,17)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Contour plot of the change in Tw caused by the bubble: Tw(t=280ms)−Tw(t=0ms). Bubble is moving from left to right. From Bayazit (16,17).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Sketch of the test chamber

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

A collage of bubble images showing plan and side views for a 15deg inclination angle

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Schematic of the two-fiber probe system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

End of the fiber optic probe

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Schematic of the calibration system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Calibration curve for the fiber optic probe

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Time history of bubble passage for a 2deg inclination (Runs 1 to 5)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Time history of bubble passage for a 2deg inclination (Runs 6 to 11)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Time history of bubble passage for a 2deg inclination (Runs 24 to 29)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Time history of bubble passage for a 2deg inclination (Runs 49 to 55)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Example traces of microlayer thickness: Run 3 at 2deg, Run 47 at 15deg

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Microlayer thickness versus bubble length

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Microlayer thickness versus bubble width

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

Microlayer thickness versus bubble volume

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 17

Definition of bubble width (W), length (L), height (H), and nose position (NP)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 18

Microlayer thickness versus Reynolds number

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 19

Microlayer thickness versus Weber number

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 20

Microlayer thickness versus Froude number

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 21

Microlayer Reynolds number as given by Eq. 10

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 22

Microlayer Reynolds number as given by Eq. 11

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 23

twave∕ttotal versus μDeqububble∕(σδ)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In