0
TECHNICAL PAPERS: Bubbles, Particles, and Droplets

Numerical Study of Single Bubble Dynamics During Flow Boiling

[+] Author and Article Information
Ding Li

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science,  University of California, Los Angeles, 420 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1597

Vijay K. Dhir1

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science,  University of California, Los Angeles, 420 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1597vdhir@seas.ucla.edu

1

Address all correspondence to this author.

J. Heat Transfer 129(7), 864-876 (Jan 16, 2007) (13 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2717942 History: Received May 17, 2006; Revised January 16, 2007

Three-dimensional numerical simulation of single bubble dynamics during nucleate flow boiling is performed in this work. The range of bulk liquid velocities investigated is from 0.076to0.23ms. The surface orientations at earth normal gravity are varied from an upward facing horizontal surface to vertical through 30, 45, and 60deg. The gravity levels on an upward facing horizontal surface are varied from 1.0ge to 0.0001ge. Continuity, momentum, and energy equations are solved by finite difference method and the level set method is used to capture the liquid-vapor interface. Heat transfer within the liquid micro layer is included in this model. The numerical results have been compared with data from experiments. The results show that the bulk flow velocity, heater surface orientation, and gravity levels influence the bubble dynamics.

Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Computational domain used in the numerical simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

(a) The definition of sliding velocity. (b) Dynamic contact angle as a function of sliding velocity.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

(a) Grid sensitivity check. (b) Bubble liftoff time as a function of grid number.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

The comparison of bubble shape for single bubble on horizontal surface, U=0.076m∕s, ΔTw=5.3°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Quantitative comparison of bubble shapes, U=0.076m∕s, ΔTw=5.3°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Velocity field at the center plane around single bubble on a horizontal surface, U=0.076m∕s, ΔTw=5.3°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Temperature field at the center plane around single bubble on a horizontal surface, U=0.076m∕s, ΔTw=5.3°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

The comparison of bubble diameter predicted from numerical simulation with experimental data obtained by Maity (5) on a horizontal surface, U=0.076m∕s, ΔTw=5.3°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

The comparison of bubble diameter predicted from numerical simulation with experimental data obtained by Maity (5) on a horizontal surface, U=0.076m∕s, ΔTw=5.3°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Effect of bulk velocity on lift off diameter, experimental data obtained by Maity (5)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Effect of bulk velocity on growth period, experimental data obtained by Maity (5)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

The comparison of bubble shape for single bubble on vertical surface, U=0.076m∕s, ΔTw=5.3°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Comparison of bubble shapes, U=0.076m∕s, ΔTw=5.3°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Velocity field during bubble growth, sliding and liftoff on a vertical surface, U=0.076m∕s, ΔTw=5.3°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Temperature field with temperature interval of 0.5°C on vertical surface, U=0.076m∕s, ΔTw=5.3°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

The comparison of bubble diameter predicted from numerical simulation with experimental data obtained by Maity (5) on a vertical surface, U=0.076m∕s, ΔTw=5.3°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 17

The dimensionless pressure contours near the bubble when the bubble is about to lift off from the vertical surface, U=0.076m∕s, ΔTw=5.3°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 18

Comparison of bubble shape predicted from numerical simulation and observed in experiment for a single bubble on 45deg inclined surface, U=0.076m∕s, ΔTw=5.3°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 19

The comparison of bubble diameter as a function of time predicted from numerical simulation with experimental data obtained by Maity (5) on 45deg inclined surface, U=0.076m∕s, ΔTw=5.3°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 20

Effect of orientation on bubble liftoff diameter, experimental data obtained by Maity (5), U=0.076m∕s, ΔTw=5.3°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 21

Bubble diameter at liftoff on an upward facing horizontal surface as a function of gravity level, ΔTw=5.3°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 22

Bubble growth period on an upward facing horizontal surface as a function of the gravity level, ΔTw=5.3°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 23

Bubble diameter at liftoff as a function of the bulk flow velocity for different gravity levels, ΔTw=5.3°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 24

Bubble growth period as a function of the bulk flow velocity for different gravity levels

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 25

Comparison of measured bubble diameter and numerical predictions for reduced gravity conditions, g=0.05ge, ΔTw=3.8°C, ΔTsub=1.5°C, U=0.076m∕s

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In