Technical Briefs

Definition and Evaluation of Mean Beam Lengths for Applications in Multidimensional Radiative Heat Transfer: A Mathematically Self-Consistent Approach

[+] Author and Article Information
Walter W. Yuen

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106

J. Heat Transfer 130(11), 114507 (Sep 05, 2008) (5 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2969752 History: Received June 19, 2007; Revised June 04, 2008; Published September 05, 2008

A set of mathematically self-consistent definitions of mean beam length is introduced to account for surface-surface, surface-volume, and volume-volume radiative exchanges in general three-dimensional inhomogeneous medium. Based on these definitions, the generic exchange factor (GEF) formulated by the recently introduced multiple-absorption-coefficient-zonal-method (MACZM) can be written in an equivalent one-dimensional form. The functional behavior of the proposed mean beam lengths is shown to be readily correlated by either simple algebraic relations or neural network based correlations. They can be implemented directly with MACZM in general computational code to account for the radiation effect in complex three-dimensional systems. In addition, these definitions of mean beam length can also be used to assess the accuracy of the conventional mean beam length concept currently used by the practicing engineering community.

Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Geometry of the emitting volume (area) and receiving volume (element) used in the definition of the two components of the GEF and the associated coordinate system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Comparison of the emission MBL and the conventional MBL and the corresponding exchange factor for the g1g2,pp exchange factor with (nx,ny,nz)=(0,0,0)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Schematic of a two-layer neural network used in generating the correlation for the emission MBL

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Comparison between the neural network prediction of the emission MBL, Lem,pp, for different geometric configurations with nz=1

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Comparison between the neural network prediction of the emission MBL, Lem,pd, for different geometric configurations with nz=1



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In