Research Papers

A Statistical Model of Bubble Coalescence and Its Application to Boiling Heat Flux Prediction—Part I: Model Development

[+] Author and Article Information
Wen Wu

Department of Nuclear, Plasma, and Radiological Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801wen.wu@gat.com

Barclay G. Jones

Department of Nuclear, Plasma, and Radiological Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801bgjones@uiuc.edu

Ty A. Newell

Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801tynewell@uiuc.edu

J. Heat Transfer 131(12), 121013 (Oct 15, 2009) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4000024 History: Received January 29, 2009; Revised July 16, 2009; Published October 15, 2009

In this work a statistical model is developed by deriving the probability density function (pdf) of bubble coalescence on boiling surface to describe the distribution of vapor bubble radius. Combining this bubble coalescence model with other existing models in the literature that describe the dynamics of bubble motion and the mechanisms of heat transfer, the surface heat flux in subcooled nucleate boiling can be calculated. By decomposing the surface heat flux into various components due to different heat transfer mechanisms, including forced convection, transient conduction, and evaporation, the effect of the bubble motion is identified and quantified. Predictions of the surface heat flux are validated with R134a data measured in boiling experiments and water data available in the literature, with an overall good agreement observed. Results indicate that there exists a limit of surface heat flux due to the increased bubble coalescence and the reduced vapor bubble lift-off radius as the wall temperature increased. Further investigation confirms the consistency between this limit value and the experimentally measured critical heat flux (CHF), suggesting that a unified mechanistic modeling to predict both the surface heat flux and CHF is possible. In view of the success of this statistical modeling, the authors tend to propose the utilization of probabilistic formulation and stochastic analysis in future modeling attempts on subcooled nucleate boiling.

Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Typical flow boiling curve

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Bubble in different stages during its life span

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Bubble life span and bubble coalescence

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Simplified bubble growth and bubble sliding curves

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Bubble relative position

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Bubble coalescence probability

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Nucleation site arrangement and compaction factor

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Influence of bubble during its sliding

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Heat transfer mechanisms at and near the wall

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Transient conduction duration

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

(a) Schematic diagram of vapor bubble; (b) free-body diagram of bubble

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Data dependency of the model





Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In