Research Papers: Experimental Techniques

Convection Calibration of Schmidt–Boelter Heat Flux Gauges in Stagnation and Shear Air Flow

[+] Author and Article Information
A. Gifford, A. Hoffie, T. Diller, S. Huxtable

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061

J. Heat Transfer 132(3), 031601 (Dec 22, 2009) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3211866 History: Received December 01, 2008; Revised July 06, 2009; Published December 22, 2009; Online December 22, 2009

Experiments were performed to characterize the performance of Schmidt–Boelter heat flux gauges in stagnation and shear convective air flows. The gauges were of a standard design (25.4 mm and 38 mm in diameter), using a copper heat sink with water cooling channels around the active sensing element. A simple model of the gauges using an internal thermal resistance between the sensor surface and the heat sink is used to interpret the results. The model predicts a nonlinear dependence of the gauge sensitivity as a function of the heat transfer coefficient. Experimental calibration systems were developed to simultaneously measure the heat flux gauge response relative to a secondary standard under the same flow and thermal conditions. The measured gauge sensitivities in the stagnation flow matched the model, and were used to estimate the value of the internal thermal resistance for each of the four gauges tested. For shear flow, the effect of the varying gauge surface temperature on the boundary layer was included. The results matched the model with a constant factor of 15–25% lower effective heat transfer coefficient. When the gauge was water cooled, the effect of the internal thermal resistance of the gauge was markedly different for the two flow conditions. In the stagnation flow, the internal resistance further decreased the apparent gauge sensitivity. Conversely, in shear flow, the resistance was effectively offset by the cooler heat sink of the gauge, and the resulting sensitivities were nearly the same as, or larger than, for radiation.

Copyright © 2010 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Heat flux sensor with the three modes of energy transfer

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Heat flux gauge resistance network for convection

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Schematic diagram of the Schmidt–Boelter gauge

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Schematic of the convection calibration facility

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Stagnation calibration stand

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

HFM mounting in a plate

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Shear stand nozzles

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Picture of the assembled shear stand

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Exit nozzle velocities from total pressure measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Typical heat flux and temperature data for the shear stand

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Typical progression of the heat transfer coefficient for the shear stand

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Stagnation calibration sensitivities for SB 137861 in stagnation flow

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Calibration sensitivities for SB 137861 in shear flow

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Stagnation calibration sensitivities for SB 137861 in stagnation flow with water cooling

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Calibration sensitivities for SB 137861 in shear flow with water cooling




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In