Research Papers

Representative Results for Condensation Measurements at Hydraulic Diameters 100Microns

[+] Author and Article Information
Akhil Agarwal

 Shell Global Solutions, Inc., Houston, TX 77210

Srinivas Garimella1

George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0405srinivas.garimella@me.gatech.edu


Corresponding author.

J. Heat Transfer 132(4), 041010 (Feb 22, 2010) (12 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4000879 History: Received December 01, 2008; Revised April 28, 2009; Published February 22, 2010; Online February 22, 2010

Condensation pressure drops and heat transfer coefficients for refrigerant R134a flowing through rectangular microchannels with hydraulic diameters ranging from 100μm to 200μm are measured in small quality increments. The channels are fabricated on a copper substrate by electroforming copper onto a mask patterned by X-ray lithography and sealed by diffusion bonding. Subcooled liquid is electrically heated to the desired quality, followed by condensation in the test section. Downstream of the test section, another electric heater is used to heat the refrigerant to a superheated state. Energy balances on the preheaters and postheaters establish the refrigerant inlet and outlet states at the test section. Water at a high flow rate serves as the test-section coolant to ensure that the condensation side presents the governing thermal resistance. Heat transfer coefficients are measured for mass fluxes ranging from 200kg/m2s to 800kg/m2s for 0< quality <1 at several different saturation temperatures. Conjugate heat transfer analyses are conducted in conjunction with local pressure drop profiles to obtain accurate driving temperature differences and heat transfer coefficients. The effects of quality, mass flux, and saturation temperature on condensation pressure drops and heat transfer coefficients are illustrated through these experiments.

Copyright © 2010 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Coolant channels, test-section subassembly

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Test facility schematic

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Test facility photograph

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Refrigerant flow path schematic for pressure drop analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Wafer layout for electroforming

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Assembled refrigerant channels

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Pressure drop along the length of the test section for the representative case

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Segmental conjugate heat transfer analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Temperature distribution for the representative case

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Variation in segment heat duty along channel length

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Frictional pressure drop for 200×100 μm channels

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Heat transfer results for 200×100 μm channels

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Microchannel layout




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In