Research Papers: Experimental Techniques

Heat Transfer Experiments in a Confined Jet Impingement Configuration Using Transient Techniques

[+] Author and Article Information
Florian Hoefler1

Nils Dietrich, Jens Wolfersdorf

 Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics (ITLR), Universitaet Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 31, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany


Corresponding author.

J. Heat Transfer 133(9), 091601 (Jul 07, 2011) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4003827 History: Received September 08, 2010; Revised March 10, 2011; Published July 07, 2011; Online July 07, 2011

A confined jet impingement configuration has been investigated in which the matter of interest is the convective heat transfer from the air flow to the passage walls. The geometry is similar to gas turbine blade cooling applications. The setup is distinct from usual cooling passages by the fact that no crossflow and no bulk flow directions are present. The flow exhausts through two staggered rows of holes opposing the impingement wall. Hence, a complex 3-D vortex system arises, which entails a complex heat transfer situation. The transient thermochromic liquid crystal (TLC) method was used in previous studies to measure the heat transfer on the passage walls. Due to the nature of these experiments, the fluid as well as the wall temperature vary with location and time. As a prerequisite of the transient TLC technique, the heat transfer coefficient is assumed to be constant over the transient experiment. Therefore, it is the scope of this article to qualify this assumption and to validate the results at discrete locations. For this purpose, fast response surface thermocouples and heat flux sensors were applied, in order to gain information on the temporal evolution of the wall heat fluxes. The linear relation between heat flux and temperature difference could be verified for all measurement sites. This validates the assumption of a constant heat transfer coefficient. Nusselt number evaluations from independent techniques show a good agreement, considering the respective uncertainty ranges. For all investigated sites, the Nusselt numbers range within ±9% of the values gained from the TLC measurement.

Copyright © 2011 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Passage fluid temperature measurement locations

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Surface thermocouples measurements sites on wall C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Schematic of cross section of the ALTP sensor module

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Fluid temperature evolution during transient experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Dimensionless passage fluid temperature evolution during transient experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Wall and jet total temperatures for two different temperature steps

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Wall heat flux versus temperature difference for two different temperature steps

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Wall heat flux versus temperatures at sites 1–4, surface TC and sensor data

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Nusselt numbers versus dimensionless wall temperature at sites 1–4

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Nusselt number distribution from TLC experiments at Re = 45,000

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Schematic of the test section geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Schematic of the experimental facility

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Schematic of an impingement cooled midchord passage of a turbine blade




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In