Research Papers: Conduction

A Multiscale Model of Thermal Contact Resistance Between Rough Surfaces

[+] Author and Article Information
Robert L. Jackson, Sushil H. Bhavnani

Mechanical Engineering Department,  Auburn University, 201 Ross Hall, Auburn, AL 36849

Timothy P. Ferguson

 Southern Research Institute, 757 Tom Martin Drive, Birmingham, AL 35211

J. Heat Transfer 130(8), 081301 (May 30, 2008) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2927403 History: Received January 17, 2007; Revised February 13, 2008; Published May 30, 2008

A new multiscale model of thermal contact resistance (TCR) between real rough surfaces is presented, which builds on Archard’s multiscale description of surface roughness. The objective of this work is to construct the new model and use it to evaluate the effects of scale dependent surface features and properties on TCR. The model includes many details affecting TCR and is also fairly easy to implement. Multiscale fractal based models often oversimplify the contact mechanics by assuming that the surfaces are self-affine, the contact area is simply a geometrical truncation of the surfaces, and the pressure is a constant value independent of geometry and material properties. Concern has grown over the effectiveness of frequently used statistical rough surface contact models due to the inadequacies in capturing the true multiscale nature of surfaces (i.e., surfaces have multiple scales of surface features). The model developed in this paper incorporates several variables, including scale dependent yield strength and scale dependent spreading resistance to develop a new model that can be used to evaluate TCR. The results suggest that scale dependent mechanical properties are more influential than scale dependent thermal properties. When compared to an existing TCR model, this very inclusive model shows the same qualitative trend. Results also show the significance of capturing multiscale roughness when addressing the thermal contact resistance problem.

Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Schematic of typical rough surface contact (the height of the asperities is exaggerated)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Schematic showing how scale dependent features can affect material properties

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Comparison of models for scale dependent yield strength

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Progression of the multiscale contact area calculations through the iterative numerical scheme

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Schematic illustrating how heat conduction may be influenced by multiple scales of roughness on the surface

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Multiscale model predicted contact area as a function of load

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Multiscale model predicted thermal contact resistance as a function of load considering scale dependent yield strength and resistance

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Comparison of current multiscale contact model to existing models used in TCR

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Comparison of current multiscale contact resistance model (using the HFTCR theory) to existing models used in TCR

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Comparison of current multiscale contact resistance model (using the MFTCR theory) to existing models used in TCR




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In