0
Technical Briefs

Numerical and Experimental Study of Solidification in a Spherical Shell

[+] Author and Article Information
E. Assis, G. Ziskind, R. Letan

Heat Transfer Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pearlstone Center for Aeronautical Studies, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel

J. Heat Transfer 131(2), 024502 (Dec 12, 2008) (5 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2993543 History: Received November 27, 2007; Revised August 04, 2008; Published December 12, 2008

The present study explores numerically and experimentally the process of a phase-change material (PCM) solidification in a spherical shell. At the initial state, the PCM liquid occupies 98.5% of the shell. The upper segment of 1.5% contains air, which flows in as the solidification progresses. In the experiments, a commercially available paraffin wax is used. Its properties are engaged in the numerical simulations. The investigation is performed for solidification in spherical shells of 20 mm, 40 mm, 60 mm, and 80 mm in diameter at the wall uniform temperature, which varied from 10°C to 40°C below the mean solidification temperature of the phase-change material. Transient numerical simulations are performed using the FLUENT 6.2 software and incorporate such phenomena as flow in the liquid phase, volumetric shrinkage due to solidification, and irregular boundary between the PCM and air. The numerical model is validated versus the experimental results. Shrinkage patterns and void formation are demonstrated. Dimensional analysis of the results is performed and presented as the PCM melt fractions versus the product of the Fourier and Stefan numbers. This analysis leads to a generalization that encompasses the cases considered herein.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Solidification with an upper void (shrinkage) for D=70 mm and ΔT=20°C(25)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Simulated solidification with upper void (D=80 mm and ΔT=20°C)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Solidification with central void (D=40 mm and ΔT=20°C): (a) numerical, and (b) experimental (25)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Summary of the numerical results: (a) summary of the results for various diameters and temperature differences, and (b) generalized results and correlation for the melt fraction

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In