0
Research Papers: Heat Exchangers

Air-Side Surface Wettability Effects on the Performance of Slit-Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchangers Operating Under Wet-Surface Conditions

[+] Author and Article Information
L. Liu

Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, 1206 West Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801lliu9@illinois.edu

A. M. Jacobi

Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, 1206 West Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801a-jacobi@illinois.edu

The correction factor F was evaluated to be 0.98, which is typical to operating conditions in this study (20).

During the experiments, the accumulation of condensate changed the friction factor. The experiments were conducted at two fixed blower frequencies: 42 rpm corresponds to a dry-surface Redh250 and 50 rpm corresponds to Redh350.

J. Heat Transfer 131(5), 051802 (Mar 18, 2009) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2994722 History: Received December 07, 2007; Revised June 18, 2008; Published March 18, 2009

A study of condensate retention and the attendant thermal-hydraulic effect associated with changes in air-side surface wettability is presented for a series of slit-fin-and-tube heat exchangers of identical geometry with controlled wettability covering a wide range of contact angles. An experiment in which the retained mass of air-side condensate was measured under dynamic conditions is described, and the results are analyzed using conventional thermal-hydraulic measurements of j and f. The data demonstrate that for the heat exchangers used in this study, the j factor is not strongly influenced by condensate retention, but the friction factor is significantly reduced for surfaces of increased wettability. Hydrophilic heat exchangers retain much less air-side condensate than do the hydrophobic heat exchangers, and the amount of retention is found to depend on the air-side Reynolds number (Redh) and the rate of latent heat transfer (Ql). Based on an assumption of filmwise condensation, a new model for predicting the mass of retained condensate is described and compared with the steady-sate retention data. The model is successful in predicting retained condensate over a wide range of tested conditions. The potential of this new approach and possible refinements that will add engineering value are discussed.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Schematic showing the geometry of the test slit-fin round-tube heat exchangers; dimensions are provided in Table 1

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Wind tunnel for thermal-hydraulic measurements and condensate retention experiments

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Heat exchanger test section. This design allows the real-time measurement of retained condensate, along with conventional thermal-hydraulic measurements. (a) wind tunnel; (b) electronic balance; (c) strap; (d) heat exchanger; (e) coolant supply; (f) flexible plastic film; (g) horizontal support; (h) drainage holes.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Problem description: laminar film condensation on a vertical fin

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Film condensation under forced convection

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Colburn j factors versus Redh under fully wet test conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Fanning f factors versus Redh under fully wet test conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

The mass of retained condensate on the tested heat exchangers as a function of time. These data were obtained under conditions: Ta,in=23.9 deg, Tc,in=4.4°C, DPup=18.3°C, and ṁc=0.056 kg/s: (a) air blower frequency 42 rpm or dry-surface Redh∼250; (b) air blower frequency 50 rpm or dry-surface Redh∼350

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

With similar latent heat transfer Ql/AT∼115 W/m2, mass retention decreases with air-side Reynolds number (least-squared-error power-law fits to data shown to enhance readability)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

With similar air-side Reynolds number Redh∼275, mass retention increases with the amount of latent heat transfer (least-squared-error power-law fits to the data shown to enhance readability)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

The retained condensate mass retention predicted by the model compared with experimental data. The lines indicate ±20% from experiments, and the rms deviation of the predictions from the experiments is 14.6%.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In