Research Papers: Jets, Wakes, and Impingment Cooling

Supersonic Two-Phase Impinging Jet Heat Transfer

[+] Author and Article Information
Richard R. Parker

Graduate Student
e-mail: parkerrr@ufl.edu

James F. Klausner

Fellow ASME
e-mail: klaus@ufl.edu

Renwei Mei

e-mail: rwmei@ufl.edu
Department of Mechanical
and Aerospace Engineering,
University of Florida,
Gainesville, FL 32611

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Heat Transfer. Manuscript received June 2, 2011; final manuscript received April 2, 2012; published online December 26, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Frank Cunha.

J. Heat Transfer 135(2), 022201 (Dec 26, 2012) (9 pages) Paper No: HT-11-1286; doi: 10.1115/1.4007408 History: Received June 02, 2011; Revised April 02, 2012

The experimental heat transfer rates from a supersonic two-phase impinging air jet with disperse droplets are presented. The experimental configuration consists of an expanding disperse mixture of air and water through a converging–diverging nozzle, designed for Mach 3.26 with a liquid to air mass flow ratio ranging from 1.28% to 3.83%, impinging upon a thin film heater constructed of nichrome. The spatially varying heat transfer coefficient is measured, and peak values are on the order of 200,000W/m2K. Two distinct regions of heat transfer are identified, one dominated by the jet impingement flow and another dominated by thin film heat transfer. The heat transfer coefficient of an impinging jet with dry air and no droplets is measured during the investigation as well. The heat transfer results are compared, and it is demonstrated that the addition of disperse water droplets to the jet significantly increases the heat removal capability of the jet as well as smoothing the spatial temperature distribution of the heater surface. As much as an order of magnitude increase in heat transfer coefficient is observed near the centerline of the jet and a factor of 3–5 increase is seen at a distance of approximately 4 nozzle diameters from the jet. The fundamental heat transfer coefficient measurements should benefit applications involving supersonic two-phase jets for high heat flux thermal management.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Heater assembly and temperature measurement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Jet impingement facility

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Variation of two-phase jet NuD for different nozzle heights

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Heater thermocouple temperature profiles for two-phase jet and different heat fluxes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Correlating single-phase jet NuD with r/D and ReD. (a) NuD(r/D) and (b) NuD/ReD(r/D).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Radial variation of single-phase jet NuD for different nozzle heights and ReD

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Heater thermocouple temperature profiles for single-phase jet and different heat fluxes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Radial variation of two-phase jet NuD for different water mass fractions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Variation of heat transfer enhancement factor with water mass fraction and ReD

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of single-phase (w = 0) and two-phase heat transfer coefficient

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Variation of heat transfer enhancement factor for different nozzle heights




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In