0
Technical Briefs

Enhanced Critical Heat Flux During Quenching of Extremely Dilute Aqueous Colloidal Suspensions With Graphene Oxide Nanosheets

[+] Author and Article Information
Zitao Yu

e-mail: yuzitao@zju.edu.cn

Danyang Li, Yacai Hu

Institute of Thermal Science and Power Systems,
Department of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, PRC

Liwu Fan

Institute of Thermal Science and Power Systems,
Department of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, PRC;
State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization,
Department of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310027, PRC
e-mail: liwufan@zju.edu.cn

Kefa Cen

State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization,
Department of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, PRC

1Corresponding authors.

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Heat Transfer. Manuscript received April 25, 2012; final manuscript received December 19, 2012; published online April 9, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Louis C. Chow.

J. Heat Transfer 135(5), 054502 (Apr 09, 2013) (5 pages) Paper No: HT-12-1193; doi: 10.1115/1.4023304 History: Received April 25, 2012; Revised December 19, 2012

In this Technical Brief, we report on preliminary results of an experimental investigation of quenching of aqueous colloidal suspensions with graphene oxide nanosheets (GONs). Extremely dilute suspensions with only 0.0001% and 0.0002% (in mass fraction) of GONs were studied and their critical heat fluxes (CHF) during quenching were determined to increase markedly by 13.2% and 25.0%, respectively, as compared to that of pure water. Such efficient CHF enhancement was interpreted to be caused primarily by the improved wettability of the quenched surfaces, due to deposition of the fish-scale-shaped GONs resulting in self-assembly quasi-ordered microscale morphologies.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Eastman, J. A., Choi, S. U. S., Li, S., Yu, W., and Thompson, L. J., 2001, “Anomalously Increased Effective Thermal Conductivities of Ethylene Glycol-Based Nanofluids Containing Copper Nanoparticles,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 78, pp. 718–720. [CrossRef]
Das, S. K., Putra, N., and Roetzel, W., 2003, “Pool Boiling Characteristics of Nano-Fluids,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 46, pp. 851–862. [CrossRef]
You, S. M., Kim, J. H., and Kim, K. H., 2003, “Effect of Nanoparticles on Critical Heat Flux of Water in Pool Boiling Heat Transfer,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 83, pp. 3374–3376. [CrossRef]
Taylor, R. A., and Phelan, P. E., 2009, “Pool Boiling of Nanofluids: Comprehensive Review of Existing Data and Limited New Data,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 52, pp. 5339–5347. [CrossRef]
Kim, H., 2011, “Enhancement of Critical Heat Flux in Nucleate Boiling of Nanofluids: A State-of-Art Review,” Nanoscale Res. Lett., 6, p. 415. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ahn, H. S., and Kim, M. H., 2012, “A Review on Critical Heat Flux Enhancement With Nanofluids and Surface Modification,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 134(2), p. 024001. [CrossRef]
Kim, S. J., Bang, I. C., Buongiorno, J., and Hu, L. W., 2006, “Effects of Nanoparticle Deposition on Surface Wettability Influencing Boiling Heat Transfer in Nanofluids,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 89, p. 153107. [CrossRef]
Kim, H. D., and Kim, M. H., 2007, “Effect of Nanoparticle Deposition on Capillary Wicking That Influences the Critical Heat Flux in Nanofluids,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 91, p. 014104. [CrossRef]
Kim, H., Ahn, H. S., and Kim, M. H., 2010, “On the Mechanism of Pool Boiling Critical Heat Flux Enhancement in Nanofluids,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 132(6), p. 061501. [CrossRef]
Milanova, D., and Kumar, R., 2008, “Heat Transfer Behavior of Silica Nanoparticles in Pool Boiling Experiment,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 130(4), p. 042401. [CrossRef]
Cieslinski, J. T., and Kaczmarczyk, T. Z., 2011, “Pool Boiling of Water-Al2O3 and Water-Cu Nanofluids on Horizontal Smooth Tubes,” Nanoscale Res. Lett., 6, p. 220. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kwark, S. M., Kumar, R., Moreno, G., and You, S. M., 2012, “Transient Characteristics of Pool Boiling Heat Transfer in Nanofluids,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 134(5), p. 051015. [CrossRef]
Kedzierski, M. A., 2012, “Effect of Diamond Nanolubricant on R134a Pool Boiling Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 134(5), p. 051001. [CrossRef]
Kedzierski, M. A., 2012, “R134a/Al2O3 Nanolubricant Mixture Pool Boiling on a Rectangular Finned Surface,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 134(12), p. 121501. [CrossRef]
Kumar, R., and Milanova, D., 2009, “Effect of Surface Tension on Nanotube Nanofluids,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 94, p. 073107. [CrossRef]
Westwater, J. W., Hwalek, J. J., and Irving, M. E., 1986, “Suggested Standard Method for Obtaining Boiling Curves by Quenching,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 25, pp. 685–692. [CrossRef]
Xue, H. S., Fan, J. R., Hong, R. H., and Hu, Y. C., 2007, “Characteristic Boiling Curve of CNT Nanofluid as Determined by the Transient Calorimeter Technique,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 90, p. 184107. [CrossRef]
Kim, H., DeWitt, G., McKrell, T., Buongiorno, J., and Hu, L. W., 2009, “On the Quenching of Steel and Zircaloy Spheres in Water-Based Nanofluids With Alumina, Silica and Diamond Nanoparticles,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 35, pp. 427–438. [CrossRef]
Lotfi, H., and Shafii, M. B., 2009, “Boiling Heat Transfer on a High Temperature Silver Sphere in Nanofluid,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., 48, pp. 2215–2220. [CrossRef]
Babu, K., and Kumar, T. S. P., 2011, “Effect of CNT Concentration and Agitation on Surface Heat Flux During Quenching in CNT Nanofluids,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 54, pp. 106–117. [CrossRef]
Chun, S. Y., Bang, I. C., Choo, Y. J., and Song, C. H., 2011, “Heat Transfer Characteristics of Si and SiC Nanofluids During a Rapid Quenching and Nanoparticles Deposition Effects,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 54, pp. 1217–1223. [CrossRef]
Bolukbasi, A., and Ciloglu, D., 2011, “Pool Boiling Heat Transfer Characteristics of Vertical Cylinder Quenched by SiO2-Water Nanofluids,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., 50, pp. 1013–1021. [CrossRef]
Park, S. D., Lee, S. W., Kang, S., Bang, I. C., Kim, J. H., Shin, H. S., Lee, D. W., and Lee, D. W., 2010, “Effects of Nanofluids Containing Graphene-Graphene-Oxide Nanosheets on Critical Heat Flux,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 97, p. 023103. [CrossRef]
Ghosh, S., Calizo, I., Teweldebrhan, D., Pokatilov, E. P., Nika, D. L., Balandin, A. A., Bao, W., Miao, F., and Lau, C. N., 2008, “Extremely High Thermal Conductivity of Graphene: Prospects for Thermal Management Applications in Nanoelectronic Circuits,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 92, p. 151911. [CrossRef]
Chen, Z., Jang, W., Bao, W., Lau, C. N., and Dames, C., 2009, “Thermal Contact Resistance Between Graphene and Silicon Dioxide,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 95, p. 161910. [CrossRef]
Yu, W., Xie, H., and Chen, W., 2010, “Experimental Investigation on Thermal Conductivity of Nanofluids Containing Graphene Oxide Nanosheets,” J. Appl. Phys., 107, p. 094317. [CrossRef]
Baby, T. T., and Ramaprabhu, S., 2010, “Investigation of Thermal and Electrical Conductivity of Graphene Based Nanofluids,” J. Appl. Phys., 108, p. 124308. [CrossRef]
Gupta, S. S., Siva, V. M., Krishnan, S., Sreeprasad, T. S., Singh, P. K., Pradeep, T., and Das, S. K., 2011, “Thermal Conductivity Enhancement of Nanofluids Containing Graphene Nanosheets,” J. Appl. Phys., 110, p. 084302. [CrossRef]
Baby, T. T., and RamaprabhuS., 2011, “Enhanced Convective Heat Transfer Using Graphene Dispersed Nanofluids,” Nanoscale Res. Lett., 6, p. 289. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kim, H., Truong, B., Buongiorno, J., and Hu, L. W., 2011, “On the Effect of Surface Roughness Height, Wettability, and Nanoporosity on Leidenfrost Phenomena,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 98, p. 083121. [CrossRef]
Kandlikar, S. G., 2001, “A Theoretical Model to Predict Pool Boiling CHF Incorporating Effects of Contact Angle and Orientation,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 123(6), pp. 1071–1079. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Images representing the measured static contact angles of pure water on (a) the original nickel-plated surface and the surfaces quenched in the aqueous nanofluids of (b) 0.0001 wt. % and (c) 0.0002 wt. % of GONs, and (d) comparison of the averaged static contact angles. The insets in (b) and (c) illustrate the suspensions as prepared (left) and after quenching (right).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Comparison of the boiling curves (heat flux versus wall superheat) for the second quenching runs of pure water and aqueous GON nanofluids at the two dilute concentrations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

TEM images of (a) a group of suspended GONs and (b) an individual GON (close-up view) in the aqueous GON dispersion (1 wt. %) as received

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

SEM images showing the morphologies of (a) the original nickel-plated surface and the surfaces quenched in the aqueous nanofluids of (b) 0.0001 wt. %, (c) 0.0002 wt. %, and (d) 0.0002 wt. % (at a higher magnification) of GONs

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In