Research Papers

Lattice Boltzmann Simulation of Heat Transfer Enhancement in a Cold Plate Using Porous Medium

[+] Author and Article Information
Abbasali Abouei Mehrizi

e-mail: abbasabouei@gmail.com

Mousa Farhadi

e-mail: mfarhadi@nit.ac.ir

Kurosh Sedighi

e-mail: ksedighi@nit.ac.ir

Amir Latif Aghili

e-mail: amir_latifaghili@yahoo.com

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
Babol University of Technology,
P.O. Box 484,
Babol 47148-71167, Iran

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Heat Transfer. Manuscript received April 22, 2012; final manuscript received February 14, 2013; published online September 23, 2013. Assoc. Editor Sujoy Kumar Saha.

J. Heat Transfer 135(11), 111006 (Sep 23, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: HT-12-1180; doi: 10.1115/1.4024611 History: Received April 22, 2012; Revised February 14, 2013

The computational study of heat transfer and fluid flow in a porous media cold plate was investigated using lattice Boltzmann method. The study was carried out on a heat exchanger including two adiabatic inlet and outlet conduit and three hot fins with constant temperature. The porous medium is positioned between the fins to enhance heat transfer rate. The local thermal equilibrium assumption between the fluid and solid phases and the Brinkman–Forchheimer extended Darcy equation was used to simulate the porous domain. The effect of porosity on heat transfer from the fins surfaces was studied at different Reynolds and Prandtl numbers. Results show that by decreasing the porosity, the heat transfer rate increases and the fluid bulk temperature grows at less time for different Reynolds and Prandtl numbers.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Nield, D. A., and Bejan, A., 2006, Convection in Porous Media, Springer, New York.
Vafai, K., 2005, Handbook of Porous Media, Taylor & Francis, New York.
Kim, S. Y., Koo, J. M., and Kuznetsov, A. V., 2001, “Effect of Anisotropy in Permeability and Effective Thermal Conductivity on Thermal Performance of an Aluminum Foam Heat Sink,” Numer. Heat Transfer, Part A, 40, pp. 21–36. [CrossRef]
Kim, S. Y., and Kuznetsov, A. V., 2003, “Optimization of Pin-Fin Heat Sinks Using Anisotropic Local Thermal Nonequilibrium Porous Model in a Jet Impinging Channel,” Numer. Heat Transfer, Part A, 44, pp. 771–787. [CrossRef]
Bhattacharya, A., and Mahajan, R. L., 2006, “Metal Foam and Finned Metal Foam Heat Sinks for Electronics Cooling in Buoyancy-Induced Convection,” ASME J. Electron. Packag., 128, pp. 259–266. [CrossRef]
Yang, J., Zeng, M., Wang, Q., and Nakayama, A., 2010, “Forced Convection Heat Transfer Enhancement by Porous Pin Fins in Rectangular Channels,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 132, p. 051702. [CrossRef]
Hamdan, M., and Al-Nimr, M. A., 2010, “The Use of Porous Fins for Heat Transfer Augmentation in Parallel-Plate Channels,” Transp. Porous Media, 84, pp. 409–420. [CrossRef]
Don, Z., Lia, W., and Song, Y., 2009, “Lattice Boltzmann Simulation of Growth and Deformation for a Rising Vapor Bubble Through Superheated Liquid,” Numer. Heat Transfer, Part A, 55, pp. 381–400. [CrossRef]
Mehrizi, A. A., Farhadi, M., Afroozi, H. H., Sedighi, K., and Darzi, A. A. R., 2012, “Mixed Convection Heat Transfer in a Ventilated Cavity With Hot Obstacle: Effect of Nanofluid and Outlet Port Location,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 39, pp. 1000–1008. [CrossRef]
Guo, Z., and Zhao, T. S., 2002, “Lattice Boltzmann Model for Incompressible Flows Through Porous Media,” Phys. Rev. E, 66, p. 036304. [CrossRef]
Seta, T., Takegoshi, E., Kitano, K., and Okui, K., 2006, “Thermal Lattice Boltzmann Model for Incompressible Flows Through Porous Media,” J. Therm. Sci. Technol., 1, pp. 90–100. [CrossRef]
Shokouhmand, H., Jam, F., and Salimpour, M. R., 2009, “Simulation of Laminar Flow and Convective Heat Transfer in Conduits Filled With Porous Media Using Lattice Boltzmann Method,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 36, pp. 378–384. [CrossRef]
Thayer, J. G., Wert, K. L., North, M. T., and Schaeffer, S., 2006, “Porous Media Cold Plate,” Patent No. 7,044,199 B2.
Bhatnagar, P. L., Gross, E. P., and Krook, M., 1954, “A Model for Collisional Processes in Gases I: Small Amplitude Processes in Charged and Neutral One-Component System,” Phys. Rev., 94, pp. 511–525. [CrossRef]
Seta, T., Takegoshi, E., and Okui, K., 2006, “Lattice Boltzmann Simulation of Natural Convection in Porous Media,” Mathem. Comput. Simul., 72, pp. 195–200. [CrossRef]
Kuznetsov, A. V., 1998, “Analytical Study of Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer during Forced Convection in a Composite Channel Partly Filled With a Brinkman–Forchheimer Porous Medium,” Flow Turbul. Combust., 60, pp. 173–192. [CrossRef]
Kuznetsov, A. V., and Xiong, M., 2000, “Numerical Simulation of the Effect of Thermal Dispersion on Forced Convection in a Circular Duct Partly Filled With a Brinkman-Forchheimer Porous Medium,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow, 10, pp. 488–502. [CrossRef]
Ergun, S., 1952, “Flow Through Packed Columns,” Chem. Eng. Prog., 48, pp. 89–94.
Peng, Y., ShuC., and Chew, Y. T., 2003, “Simplified Thermal Lattice Boltzmann Model for Incompressible Thermal Flows,” Phys. Rev. E, 68, p. 026701.
Kaviany, M., 1985, “Laminar Flow Through a Porous Channel Bounded by Isothermal Parallel Plates,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 28, pp. 851–858. [CrossRef]
Vafai, K., and Sözen, M., 1990, “An Investigation of a Latent Heat Storage Porous Bed and Condensing Flow Through it,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 112, pp. 1014–1022. [CrossRef]
Nield, D. A., Kuznetsov, A. V., and Xiong, M., 2002, “Effect of Local Thermal no-Equilibrium on Thermally Developing Forced Convection in a Porous Medium,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 45, pp. 4949–4955. [CrossRef]
Kaviani, M., 1995, Principle of Heat Transfer in Porous Media, Springer, New York.
Yang, C., Ando, K., and Nakayama, A., 2011, “A Local Thermal Non-Equilibrium Analysis of Fully Developed Forced Convective Flow in a Tube Filled With a Porous Medium,” Transp. Porous Media, 89, pp. 237–249. [CrossRef]
Zehener, P., 1970, “Waermeleitfahigkeit won Schuettungen be MassigenTemperaturea,” Chem.-Ing.-Tech., 42, pp. 933–941. [CrossRef]
Zou, Q., and He, X., 1997, “On Pressure and Velocity Boundary Conditions for the Lattice Boltzmann BGK Model,” Phys. Fluids, 9, pp 1591–159. [CrossRef]
Liu, C.-H., Lin, K.-H., Mai, H.-C., and Lin, C.-A., 2010, “Thermal Boundary Conditions for Thermal Lattice Boltzmann Simulations,” Comput. Math. Appl., 59, pp. 2178–2193. [CrossRef]
Bao, J., Yuan, P., and Schaefer, L., 2008, “A Mass Conserving Boundary Condition for the Lattice Boltzmann Equation Method,” J. Comput. Phys., 227, pp. 8472–8487. [CrossRef]
Mahmud, S., and Fraser, R. A., 2005, “Flow, Thermal, and Entropy Generation Characteristics Inside a Porous Channel With Viscous Dissipation,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., 44, pp. 21–32. [CrossRef]
Alazmi, B., and Vafai, K., 2000, “Analysis of Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer Interfacial Conditions Between a Porous Medium and a Fluid Layer,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 44, pp. 1735–1749. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Computational domain and boundary condition. (a) 3D physical model and (b) 2D simulative model.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Temperature distribution at the middle of: (a) clear zone and (b) porous zone

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Dimensionless velocity profiles for: (a) full porous channel at various Reynolds number, (b) full porous channel at various Darcy number, and (c) the interface between porous medium and fluid layer

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Streamlines and temperature contours with different Reynolds numbers and porosities

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Temperature contours for different Reynolds numbers and porosities

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Nondimensional bulk mean temperature versus the (a) Reynolds number for different porosities at Pr = 0.7, (b) Prandtl number for different porosities at Re = 40

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Variation of dimensionless time to reach the steady state versus: (a) Reynolds number when Pr = 0.7 and (b) Prandtl number when Re = 40

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Variation of average Nusselt number in the fins versus the porosity. (a) Re = 10, (b) Re = 20, (c) Re = 40, and (d) Re = 60.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Variation of average Nusselt number in the fins for different values of porosity when Pr = 0.7 versus the Reynolds number. (a) Inlet fin, (b) central fin, and (c) outlet fin.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Variation of average Nusselt number in the fins, with different Prandtl numbers versus the porosity. (a) Pr=0.5, (b) Pr=0.7, (c) Pr = 1, and (d) Pr = 5.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In