Research Papers: Heat Exchangers

The Effect of Combined Flow and Temperature Maldistribution on Heat Exchangers: Characteristics of Deterioration Factor Ratio, Y

[+] Author and Article Information
Wai Meng Chin

O. Y. L. Research & Development
Center SDN BHD,
Lot 60334, Persiaran Bukit Rahman Putra 3,
47000 Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
e-mail: chinwm@oyl.com.my

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER. Manuscript received August 13, 2012; final manuscript received May 31, 2013; published online September 27, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Wei Tong.

J. Heat Transfer 135(12), 121802 (Sep 27, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: HT-12-1432; doi: 10.1115/1.4024772 History: Received August 13, 2012; Revised May 31, 2013

The magnitude of thermal performance degradation factor Dc for a heat exchanger as a result of combining the flow and temperature maldistribution is shown to depend on the magnitude of the shape index, S, and the statistical moments of probability density function for the flow maldistribution. In this paper, the theoretical basis describing the translational behavior of Dc with respect to S, and the influence of the statistical moments on the deterioration factor ratio Y, are given. The analysis is performed on a discretized model of an arbitrary heat exchanger. The flow distribution profile is also discretized to reveal the influence of statistical moments on Dc. The numerical calculations reveal that the combined thermal degradation factor, Dc, is a simple summation of the thermal degradation factor due to flow maldistribution alone, D, and a translational factor, XT. The value of S depends on the distribution profiles of flow and temperature. Large values of S, i.e., greater than the number N of discretized elements of the heat exchanger, and low standard deviation and high skew of the flow distribution are desirable for good thermal performance, as these reduce the magnitude of Dc and increase Y. At large values of S, maldistribution can lead, not to degradation but to augmentation of thermal performance in the heat exchanger. A critical normalized standard deviation, σ′cr, is used to characterize the transition to heat transfer augmentation for a given magnitude of S > N and skew. For any imposed flow and temperature maldistribution profiles defined by their statistical moments, these results allow development of correlation equations with the shape index and statistical moments, and enable prediction of the deterioration factor ratio Y to aid in the design of heat exchangers.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Chin, W. M., and Raghavan, V. R., 2011, “On the Adverse Influence of Higher Statistical Moments of Flow Maldistribution on the Performance of a Heat Exchanger,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., 50(4), pp. 581–591. [CrossRef]
Chin, W. M., and Raghavan, V. R., 2011, “The Influence of the Moments of Probability Density Function for Flow Maldistribution on the Thermal Performance of a Fin-Tube Heat Exchanger,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., 50(10), pp. 1942–1953. [CrossRef]
Chiou, J. P., 1982, “The Effect of Nonuniformities of Inlet Temperatures of Both Fluids on the Thermal Performance of a Crossflow Heat Exchanger,” ASME Paper No. 82-WA/HT-42.
Chiou, J. P., 1985, “The Combined Effects of Maldistributions of the Inlet Air Temperature and the Induced Flow Nonuniformity on the Performance of Radiator, Heater and Oil Cooler,” SAE Trans., Paper No. 850037.
Ranganayakulu, Ch., and Seetharamu, K. N., 1999, “The Combined Effects of Longitudinal Heat Conduction, Flow Nonuniformity and Temperature Nonuniformity in Crossflow Plate-Fin Heat Exchangers,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 26(5), pp. 669–68. [CrossRef]
Ranganayakulu, Ch., and Seetharamu, K. N., 1999, “The Combined Effects of Wall Longitudinal Heat Conduction, Inlet Fluid Flow Nonuniformity and Temperature Nonuniformity in Compact Tube-Fin Heat Exchangers: A Finite Element Method,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 42, pp. 263–273. [CrossRef]
Chwalowski, M., Didion, D. A., and Domanski, P. A., 1989, “Verification of Evaporator Computer Models and Analysis Performance of an Evaporator Coil,” ASHRAE Trans., 95(1), pp. 1229–1236. Available at http://www.techstreet.com/ashrae/products/1713154
Domanski, P. A., 1991, “Simulation of an Evaporator With Non-Uniform One-Dimensional Air Distribution,” ASHRAE Trans., 97(1), pp. 793–802. Available at http://www.techstreet.com/ashrae/products/1717428
Lee, J., Kwon, Y. C., and Kim, M. H., 2003, “An Improved Method for Analyzing a Fin and Tube Evaporator Containing a Zeotropic Mixture Refrigerant With Air Mal-Distribution,” Int. J. Refrig., 60, pp. 707–720 [CrossRef]
Choi, J. M., Payne, W. V., and Domanski, P. A., 2003, “Effects of Non-Uniform Refrigerant and Air Flow Distributions on Finned-Tube Evaporator Performance,” Proceedings of the 21st International Congress of Refrigeration, Washington, DC, Paper No. ICR0040.
Koern, M. R., Brix, W., Elmegaard, B., and Larsen, L. F. S., 2011, “Compensation of Flow Maldistribution in Fin-and-Tube Evaporators for Residential Air-Conditioning,” Int. J. Refrig., 34, pp. 1230–1237. [CrossRef]
Zhang, L. Z., 2009, “Flow Maldistribution and Thermal Performance Deterioration in a Cross-Flow Air to Air Heat Exchanger With Plate Fin Cores,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 52(19–20), pp. 4500–4509. [CrossRef]
Habib, M. A., Ben-MansourR., Said, S. A. M., Al-Qahtani, M. S., Al-Bagawi, J. J., and Al-Mansour, K. M., 2009, “Evaluation of Flow Maldistribution in Air-cooled Heat Exchangers,” Comput. Fluids, 38(3), pp. 677–690. [CrossRef]
Shaji, K., and Das, S. K., 2010, “The Effect of Flow Maldistribution on the Evaluation of Axial-Dispersion and Thermal Performance During the Single-Blow Testing of Plate Heat Exchangers,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 53(7–8), pp. 1591–1602. [CrossRef]
Shaji, K., and Das, S. K., 2013, “Effect of Plate Characteristics on Axial-Dispersion and Heat Transfer in Plate Heat Exchangers,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 135(4), p. 041801. [CrossRef]
Elmahdy, A. H., and Mitalas, G. P., 1977, “A Simple Model for Cooling and Dehumidifying Coils for use in Calculating Energy Requirements for Buildings,” ASHRAE Trans., 83(2), pp. 103–117. Available at http://www.techstreet.com/ashrae/products/1856020


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Illustration of simultaneous combination of velocity and temperature maldistributions on a heat exchanger

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Trend of XT versus the elemental mean shape index, s¯ (σ′ = 0.32, γ′ = 0.00)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Curves showing the translational characteristics with different magnitudes of S: (a) Dc-σ′ plots (as σ′ varies for a given skew γ′#) and (b) Dc-γ′ plots (as γ′ varies for the same σ′cr)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Flowchart to compute critical standard deviation, σ′cr for a fixed S > N and skew γ′

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Plot of Dc versus s¯ for three different discrete element sizes (NTU = 1.24, standard deviation = 0.32, and skew = 0.00)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Plot of Y versus S (NTU = 1.00, σ′ = 0.45)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Plot of Y versus NTU (σ′ = 0.11, γ′ = 1.00)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Plot of Y versus skew (NTU = 1.00, σ′ = 0.45)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Plot of Y versus standard deviation (NTU = 1.00, γ′ = 0.0)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Representation of a velocity maldistribution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Illustration of discretized probability density function




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In