0
Research Papers: Evaporation, Boiling, and Condensation

Physics of the Interaction of Ultrasonic Excitation With Nucleate Boiling

[+] Author and Article Information
Dhiman Chatterjee

e-mail: dhiman@iitm.ac.in
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai 600036, India

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER. Manuscript received July 15, 2012; final manuscript received October 3, 2013; published online November 21, 2013. Assoc. Editor: James A. Liburdy.

J. Heat Transfer 136(3), 031501 (Nov 21, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: HT-12-1370; doi: 10.1115/1.4025641 History: Received July 15, 2012; Revised October 03, 2013

Physics of ultrasound-assisted augmentation of saturated nucleate boiling through the interaction of multiphase fluid flow is revealed in the present work. Different regimes of influence of ultrasound, ranging from augmentation to deterioration and even no effect, as reported in literature in a contradictory fashion, have been observed. However unlike the previous studies, here it has been clearly demonstrated that this apparent anomaly lies in the different natures of interactions between the influencing parameters like heat flux, ultrasonic frequency, and pressure amplitude. The present results clearly bring out an interactive effect of these operating parameters with surface parameter like surface roughness. A mechanistic model unifying all these parameters has been presented to explain quantitatively the physics of the interaction. The model-based predictions match experimental results quite well suggesting the validity of the hypothesis on liquid–vapor-surface interaction through the process of nucleation and its site density, on which the model is built, and thus revealing the underlying physics.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of pool boiling experimental setup with a zoomed view showing heat details

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Sectional view of the transducer assembly; (b) photograph of set up for calibrating piezoelectric transmitter

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Frequency response of the ultrasonic transducer near 47 kHz. Inset figure shows the full frequency spectrum.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Variation of acoustic pressure amplitude with (a) axial distance and (b) radial distance from the transducer center. Driving frequency is 47 kHz.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Schematic of the main heater

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of pool boiling data with Rohsenow correlation. Also shown boiling curve in presence of passive transducer.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Change in heat transfer coefficient because of applied acoustic field (a) 47 kHz, (b) 140 kHz, and (c) 185 kHz

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Reduction in superheat requirement with increasing acoustic pressure amplitude at different heat fluxes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of experimental data with the prediction based on the mechanistic model developed in this paper

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Variation of equilibrium radius with pressure amplitude at 47, 140, and 185 kHz

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Variation of modeling constant B with heat flux at 47 and 140 kHz

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In