Research Papers: Conduction

The Influence of Carbon Nanotube Aspect Ratio on Thermal Conductivity Enhancement in Nanotube–Polymer Composites

[+] Author and Article Information
Rahul S. Kapadia

e-mail: rskapadi@ucsd.edu

Brian M. Louie

e-mail: bmlouie@ucsd.edu

Prabhakar R. Bandaru

e-mail: pbandaru@ucsd.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of California,
San Diego, CA 92093

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Heat Transfer. Manuscript received February 28, 2013; final manuscript received July 9, 2013; published online October 25, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Oronzio Manca.

J. Heat Transfer 136(1), 011303 (Oct 25, 2013) (6 pages) Paper No: HT-13-1106; doi: 10.1115/1.4025047 History: Received February 28, 2013; Revised July 09, 2013

We report and model a linear increase in the thermal conductivity (κ) of polymer composites incorporated with relatively low length/diameter aspect ratio multiwalled carbon nanotubes (CNTs). There was no evidence of percolation-like behavior in the κ, at/close to the theoretically predicted threshold, which was attributed due to the interfacial resistance between the CNT and the polymer matrix. Concomitantly, the widely postulated high thermal conductivity of CNTs does not contribute to the net thermal conductivity of the composites. Through estimating the interfacial resistance and the thermal conductivity of the constituent CNTs, we conclude that our experimental and modeling approaches can be used to study thermal transport behavior in nanotube–polymer composites.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Chung, D., 2001, “Comparison of Submicron-Diameter Carbon Filaments and Conventional Carbon Fibers as Fillers in Composite Materials,” Carbon, 39(8), pp. 1119–1125. [CrossRef]
Pfeifer, S., Park, S.-H., and Bandaru, P. R., 2010, “Analysis of Electrical Percolation Thresholds in Carbon Nanotube Networks Using the Weibull Probability Distribution,” J. Appl. Phys., 108(2), 15, p. 024305. [CrossRef]
Yu, C., Kim, Y. S., Kim, D., and Grunlan, J. C., 2008, “Thermoelectric Behavior of Segregated-Network Polymer Nanocomposites,” Nano Lett., 8(12), pp. 4428–4432. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Park, S.-H., Theilmann, P. T., Asbeck, P. M., and Bandaru, P. R., 2010, “Enhanced Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Through the Use of Functionalized Carbon-Nanotube-Reactive Polymer Composites,” IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol., 9(4), pp. 464–469. [CrossRef]
Bigg, D. M., and Stutz, D. E., 1983, “Plastic Composites for Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Applications,” Polym. Compos., 4(1), pp. 40–46. [CrossRef]
Rashid, E. S. A., Ariffin, K., Akil, H. M., and Chee, C. K., 2008, “Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Polymer Composites for Electronic Packaging Application,” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 27(15), pp. 1573–1584. [CrossRef]
Narayana, S., and Sato, Y., 2012, “Heat Flux Manipulation With Engineered Thermal Materials,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, p. 214303. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Shenogina, N., Shenogin, S., Xue, L., and Keblinski, P., 2005, “On the Lack of Thermal Percolation in Carbon Nanotube Composites,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 87(13), p. 133106. [CrossRef]
Landauer, R., 1978, “Electrical Conductivity in Inhomogeneous Media,” AIP Conf. Proc., 40(1), pp. 2–45. [CrossRef]
Huxtable, S., Cahill, D., Shenogin, S., Xue, L., Ozisik, R., Barone, P., Usrey, M., Strano, M., Siddons, G., Shim, M., and Keblinski, P., 2003, “Interfacial Heat Flow in Carbon Nanotube Suspensions,” Nature Mater., 2(11), pp. 731–734. [CrossRef]
Biercuk, M., Llaguno, M., Radosavljevic, M., Hyun, J., Johnson, A., and Fischer, J., 2002, “Carbon Nanotube Composites for Thermal Management,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 80(15), pp. 2767–2769. [CrossRef]
Bonnet, P., Sireude, D., Garnier, B., and Chauvet, O., 2007, “Thermal Properties and Percolation in Carbon Nanotube-Polymer Composites,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 91(20), p. 201910. [CrossRef]
Cahill, D. G., 1990, “Thermal Conductivity Measurement From 30 to 750 K: The 3 Omega Method,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 61(2), pp. 802–808. [CrossRef]
Park, S.-H., and Bandaru, P. R., 2010, “Improved Mechanical Properties of Carbon Nanotube/Polymer Composites Through the Use of Carboxyl-Epoxide Functional Group Linkages,” Polymer, 51(22), pp. 5071–5077. [CrossRef]
ASTM Standard E1225, 2009, “Standard Test Method for Thermal Conductivity of Solids by Means of the Guarded-Comparative-Longitudinal Heat Flow Technique,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2003, doi:10.1520/E1225-09, www.astm.org.
ASTM Standard D5470, 2012, “Standard Test Method for Thermal Transmission Properties of Thermally Conductive Electrical Insulation Materials,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2003, doi:10.1520/D5470-12, www.astm.org.
Tleoubaev, A., Brzezinski, A., and Braga, L. C., 2008, “Accurate Simultaneous Measurements of Thermal Conductivity and Specific Heat of Rubber, Elastomers, and Other Materials,” Proceedings of 12th Brazilian Rubber Technology Congress, Sao Paulo, Brazil, April 22–24.
Price, D. M., and Jarratt, M., 2000, “Thermal Conductivity of PTFE and PTFE Composites,” Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Conference of the North American Thermal Analysis Society, Orlando, FL.
Bruggeman, D. A. G., 1935, “Berechnung Verschiedener Physikalischer Konstanten Von Heterogenen Substanzen,” Ann. Phys. (Leipz.), 24, p. 636. [CrossRef]
Balberg, I., 1985, “Universal Percolation-Threshold Limits in the Continuum,” Phys. Rev. B, 31, pp. 4053–4055. [CrossRef]
Deng, F., Zheng, Q.-S., Wang, L.-F., and Nan, C.-W., 2007, “Effects of Anisotropy, Aspect Ratio, and Nonstraightness of Carbon Nanotubes on Thermal Conductivity of Carbon Nanotube Composites,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 90(2), p. 021914. [CrossRef]
Swartz, E. T., and Pohl, R. O., 1989, “Thermal Boundary Resistance,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 61(3), pp. 605–668. [CrossRef]
Chen, T., Weng, G., and Liu, W., 2005, “Effect of Kapitza Contact and Consideration of Tube-End Transport on the Effective Conductivity in Nanotube-Based Composites,” J. Appl. Phys., 97(10, Part 1), p. 104312. [CrossRef]
Nan, C., 1994, “Effective-Medium Theory of Piezoelectric Composites,” J. Appl. Phys., 76(2), pp. 1155–1163. [CrossRef]
Nan, C., Birringer, R., Clarke, D., and Gleiter, H., 1997, “Effective Thermal Conductivity of Particulate Composites With Interfacial Thermal Resistance,” J. Appl. Phys., 81(10), pp. 6692–6699. [CrossRef]
Bryning, M. B., Milkie, D. E., Islam, M. F., Kikkawa, J. M., and Yodh, A. G., 2005, “Thermal Conductivity and Interfacial Resistance in Single-Wall Carbon Nanotube Epoxy Composites,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 87(16), p. 161909. [CrossRef]
Zhong, H., and Lukes, J. R., 2006, “Interfacial Thermal Resistance Between Carbon Nanotubes: Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Analytical Thermal Modeling,” Phys. Rev. B, 74(12), p. 125403. [CrossRef]
Nan, C., Li, X., and Birringer, R., 2000, “Inverse Problem for Composites With Imperfect Interface: Determination of Interfacial Thermal Resistance, Thermal Conductivity of Constituents, and Microstructural Parameters,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 83(4), pp. 848–854. [CrossRef]
Liang, Q., Moon, K.-S., Jiang, H., and Wong, C. P., 2012, “Thermal Conductivity Enhancement of Epoxy Composites by Interfacial Covalent Bonding for Underfill and Thermal Interfacial Materials in Cu/Low-K Application,” IEEE Trans. Compon., Packag., Manuf. Technol., 2(10), pp. 1571–1579. [CrossRef]
Liang, Q., Yao, X., Wang, W., Liu, Y., and Wong, C. P., 2011, “A Three-Dimensional Vertically Aligned Functionalized Multilayer Graphene Architecture: An Approach for Graphene-Based Thermal Interfacial Materials,” ACS Nano, 5(3), pp. 2392–2401. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image indicating uniform dispersion of MWCNTs in polymer matrix

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic representation of experimental setup for the thermal conductivity (κ) measurement of the nanotube–polymer composite. The heat flux, (q), was deduced from the TC recordings in the top and bottom stainless steel bars. Typical values of average heat flux (qavg) observed was ∼3500 W/m2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Experimentally measured values of κcomp with increasing volume fraction of CNTs. Circle symbols denote the values for composites with MWCNTs of AR = 35, while the star symbols denote the values for composites with MWCNTs of AR = 70.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

A unit cell of a CNT with surrounding interface layer was used as a constituent to model the nanotube–polymer composite

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Modeling κcomp, using κCNT as a fitting parameter. Circle symbols indicate experimental values for composites constituted of MWCNTs with an average AR of 35.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Equivalent circuit model for thermal transport in a nanotube–polymer composite. The top branch indicates the two interfaces in series with a CNT, while the bottom branch models heat flow through the polymer matrix.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Ratio of the thermal resistance from the nanotube and two interfaces: (Rtotal) to the interfacial resistance, (Rint), as a function of the intrinsic thermal conductivity of the CNT: κCNT

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Modeled κcomp increase, showing effect of increasing length, L of MWCNT (d is constant). Triangle symbols indicate experimental data for composites with constituent MWCNT fillers of average AR of 70.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Modeled κcomp increase showing effect of increasing diameter, d of MWCNT (L is constant). Square symbols indicate experimental data for composites with constituent MWCNT fillers of average AR of 35, while star symbols indicate experimental data for composites with constituent MWCNT fillers of average AR of 70.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In