0
Research Papers: Thermal Systems

Experimental Investigation of Temperature Separation in a Counter-Flow Vortex Tube

[+] Author and Article Information
P. A. Ramakrishna

Department of Aerospace Engineering,
IIT Madras,
Chennai 600 036, India
e-mail: parama@ae.iitm.ac.in

M. Ramakrishna, R. Manimaran

Department of Aerospace Engineering,
IIT Madras,
Chennai 600 036, India

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER. Manuscript received August 7, 2012; final manuscript received March 12, 2014; published online April 23, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Wei Tong.

J. Heat Transfer 136(8), 082801 (Apr 23, 2014) (6 pages) Paper No: HT-12-1422; doi: 10.1115/1.4027248 History: Received August 07, 2012; Revised March 12, 2014

An experimental study of a counter-flow Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube is reported here. Literature has been divided over the mechanism of energy transfer responsible for the temperature separation in the vortex tube. A black box approach is used to design experiments to infer the relative roles of heat transfer and shear work transfer in the counter-flow vortex tube. To this end, the stagnation temperature and the mass flow rates are measured at the inlet and the two outlets. In addition, pressure measurements at the stagnation condition and at the inlet section to the vortex tube were made. Based on these experiments, it is reasoned that the predominant mode of energy transfer responsible for temperature separation in a counter-flow vortex is the shear work transfer between the core and the periphery.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

A schematic of the experimental setup. Po, To, Tc, Th, m·i,m·c,m·h are measured. Nominal values of absolute pressure are also shown.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Possible paths of energy transfer between the core, periphery, and the ambient atmosphere. AB and GF represent the walls of the vortex tube, BC the cold exit, AG the inlet, BCDE the core flow, and EFGAB the flow in the periphery. m·h is the net flow through DEF. Ha and Hc represent the process heat and Wa and Wb represent work.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A sectional view of the Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube along with view of the cold end

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Graphs capturing the variation of the cold-end temperatures with mass fraction ε

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Variation of temperature separation with mass fraction for different materials

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Performance of the vortex tube made of copper and insulated by wax

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

A schematic of the revised experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Performance of the vortex tubes made of copper and steel at Po = 2 bar and different inlet total temperatures To corresponding to case 1: Ha≈0 and case 2:Ha > 0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

A schematic of the experimental setup for low pressure measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Sectional view of the vortex chamber showing pressure tap used as pressure port 4 at the inlet

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In