0
Research Papers: Evaporation, Boiling, and Condensation

Heat Flux Controlled Pool Boiling of Zirconia–Water and Silver–Water Nanofluids on a Flat Plate: A Coupled Map Lattice Simulation

[+] Author and Article Information
Sayan Sadhu

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur,
Kanpur, UP 208016, India

P. S. Ghoshdastidar

Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur,
Kanpur, UP 208016, India
e-mail: psg@iitk.ac.in

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER. Manuscript received November 14, 2013; final manuscript received October 22, 2014; published online November 25, 2014. Assoc. Editor: W. Q. Tao.

J. Heat Transfer 137(2), 021503 (Feb 01, 2015) (9 pages) Paper No: HT-13-1581; doi: 10.1115/1.4028974 History: Received November 14, 2013; Revised October 22, 2014; Online November 25, 2014

In the present work, the characteristic atmospheric saturated heat flux controlled pool boiling curves for zirconia–water and silver–water nanofluids have been reproduced by the coupled map lattice (CML) method using a two-dimensional (2D) boiling field model. The heater is a long horizontal flat plate of thickness 0.44 mm. The pool height is 0.7 mm. The stirring action of the bubbles is modeled by increasing the fluid thermal diffusivity by an enhancement factor. The thermal conduction in the plate is also incorporated into the model. The basic advantage of CML is that individual bubbles are not tracked, and yet the effects of bubbles are reflected qualitatively in the final solution. In the simulation of atmospheric saturated pool boiling of water minimum cavity diameter taken is 0.8 μm based on which a random distribution of cavity sizes has been specified. In the boiling of ZrO2–water nanofluid there is a deposition of nanoparticles in the cavities on the heated surface resulting in reduction of surface roughness. This feature is taken care of by proportionate decrease in minimum cavity diameter. The CML model predicts decrease in heat transfer coefficient and increase in critical heat flux (CHF) with increase in zirconia nanoparticle concentration. In the case of Ag–water nanofluid no such deposition of nanoparticles has been reported; rather surface oxidation occurs which increases the surface roughness. This is simulated by proportionately increasing the minimum cavity diameter with weight fractions of nanoparticles. The present CML model predicts increase in the heat transfer coefficient and decrease in CHF with increase in silver nanoparticle concentration. Thus, the CML results for the boiling of the aforesaid two nanofluids match qualitatively with the published experimental works.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Choi, S. U. S., 1995, “Enhancing Thermal Conductivity of Fluids With Nanoparticles,” Developments and Applications of Non-Newtonian Flows, FED-Vol. 231/MD-Vol. 66, D. A.Siginer, and H. P.Wang, eds., ASME, New York, pp. 99–105.
Das, S. K., Putra, N., and Roetzel, W., 2003, “Pool Boiling Characteristics of Nanofluids,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 46(3), pp. 851–862. [CrossRef]
Vassallo, P., Kumar, R., and D'Amico, S., 2004, “Pool Boiling Heat Transfer Experiments in Silica–Water Nanofluids,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 47(2), pp. 407–411. [CrossRef]
Bang, I. C., and Chang, S. H., 2005, “Boiling Heat Transfer Performance and Phenomena of Al2O3–Water Nanofluid From a Plain Surface in a Pool,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 48, pp. 2407–2419. [CrossRef]
Kim, H. D., Kim, J., and Kim, M. H., 2007, “Experimental Studies on CHF Characteristics of Nanofluids at Pool Boiling,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 33, pp. 691–706. [CrossRef]
Park, K.-J., and Jung, D., 2007, “Enhancement of Nucleate Boiling Heat Transfer Using Carbon Nanotubes,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 50, pp. 4499–4502. [CrossRef]
Chopkar, M., Das, A. K., Manna, I., and Das, P. K., 2008, “Pool Boiling Heat Transfer Characteristics of ZrO2–Water Nanofluids From a Flat Surface in a Pool,” Heat Mass Transfer, 44, pp. 999–1004. [CrossRef]
Liu, Z.-H., and Liao, L., 2008, “Sorption and Agglutination Phenomenon of Nanofluids on a Plain Heating Surface During Pool Boiling,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 51(9–10), pp. 2593–2602. [CrossRef]
Kathiravan, R., Kumar, R., Gupta, A., and Chandra, R., 2010, “Preparation and Pool Boiling Characteristics of Copper Nanofluids Over a Flat Plate Heater,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 53(9), pp. 1673–1681. [CrossRef]
Kathiravan, R., Kumar, R., Gupta, A., Chandra, R., and Jain, P. K., 2011, “Pool Boiling Characteristics of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Based Nanofluids Over a Flat Plate Heater,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 54(7), pp. 1289–1296. [CrossRef]
Kathiravan, R., Kumar, R., Gupta, A., and Chandra, R., 2012, “Preparation and Pool Boiling Characteristics of Silver Nanofluids Over a Flat Plate Heater,” Heat Transfer Eng., 33(2), pp. 69–78. [CrossRef]
Kaneko, K., 1993, Theory and Applications of Coupled Map Lattices, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Sadasivan, P., Unal, C., and Nelson, R. A., 1995, “Nonlinear Aspects of High Heat Flux Nucleate Boiling Heat Transfer,” Report No. LA-UR-95-609.
Shoji, M., and Tajima, K., 1997, “Mathematical Simulation Model of Boiling: Modes and Chaos,” Convective Flow and Pool Boiling Conference, Kloster Irsee, Germany, May 18–23.
Ellepola, J., and Kenning, D., 1996, “Nucleation Site Interaction in Pool Boiling,” Proceedings of the Second European Thermal Sciences and 14th UK National Heat Transfer Conference, Rome, Italy, May 29–31, pp. 1669–1675.
Nelson, R., Kenning, D., and Shoji, M., 1996, “Nonlinear Dynamics in Boiling Phenomena,” ASME J. Heat Transfer Soc., Jpn., 35(1), pp. 22–34.
Nelson, R., Kenning, D., and Shoji, M., 1997, “Nonlinear Effects and Behavior in Nucleate Boiling,” Fourth Experimental Chaos Conference, Boca Raton, FL, Aug. 6–8.
Yanagita, T., 1992, “Phenomenology for Boiling: A Coupled Map Lattice Model,” Chaos, 2, pp. 343–350. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Shoji, M., 1998, “Boiling Simulator—A Simple Theoretical Model of Boiling,” Third International Conference of Multiphase Flow, Lyon, France, June 8–12, pp. 1–7.
Ghoshdastidar, P. S., Kabelac, S., and Mohanty, A., 2004, “Numerical Modelling of Atmospheric Pool Boiling by the Coupled Map Lattice Method,” J. Mech. Eng. Sci., IMechE Part C, 218, pp. 195–205. [CrossRef]
Gupta, A., and Ghoshdastidar, P. S., 2006, “A Three-Dimensional Numerical Modeling of Atmospheric Pool Boiling by the Coupled Map Lattice Method,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 128(11), pp. 1149–1158. [CrossRef]
Sakashita, H., and Kumada, T., 2001, “Method for Predicting Boiling Curves of Saturated Nucleate Boiling,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 44(3), pp. 673–682. [CrossRef]
Maruyama, S., Shoji, M., and Shimizu, S., 1992, “A Numerical Simulation of Transition Boiling Heat Transfer,” Proceedings of the Second JSME–KSME Thermal Engineering Conference, Kitakyusyu, Oct. 19–21, Vol. 3, pp. 345–348.
He, Y., Shoji, M., and Maruyama, S., 2001, “Numerical Study of High Heat Flux Pool Boiling Heat Transfer,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 44(12), pp. 2357–2373. [CrossRef]
Xiao, B., and Boming, Y., 2007, “A Fractal Model for Critical Heat Flux in Pool Boiling,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., 46, pp. 426–433. [CrossRef]
Chung, H. J., and No, H. C., 2007, “A Nucleate Boiling Limitation Model for the Prediction of Pool Boiling CHF,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 50(15–16), pp. 2944–2951. [CrossRef]
Chu, H., and Boming, Y., 2009, “A New Comprehensive Model for Nucleate Pool Boiling Heat Transfer of Pure Liquid at Low to High Heat Fluxes Including CHF,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 52, pp. 4203–4210. [CrossRef]
Wang, C. H., and Dhir, V. K., 1993, “Effect of Surface Wettability on Active Nucleation Site Density During Pool Boiling of Water on a Vertical Surface,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 115, pp. 659–669. [CrossRef]
Stephan, K., and Abdelsalam, M., 1980, “Heat-Transfer Correlations for Natural Convection Boiling,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 23, pp. 73–87. [CrossRef]
Tannehill, J. C., Anderson, D. A., and Pletcher, R. H., 1997, Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, 2nd ed., Taylor and Francis, London, UK.
Carnahan, B., Luther, H. A., and Wilkes, J. O., 1969, Applied Numerical Methods, Wiley, New York.
Incropera, F. P., and Dewitt, D. P., 2002, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 5th ed., Wiley, Chichester, UK.
van Stralen, S., and Cole, R., 1979, Boiling Phenomena, Vol. 1, Hemisphere, New York.
Holman, J. P., 1986, Heat Transfer, 6th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Perry, H., 1997, Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook, 7th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Computational domain and sublattices

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Nucleation superheat distribution for pool boiling of water at p = 1 bar

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Flowchart of the solution algorithm for pool boiling of water

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Flowchart of the solution algorithm for pool boiling of water-based nanofluids

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of CML-produced pool boiling curves for water and ZrO2–water nanofluids with the experimental results of Chopkar et al. [7]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of CML-produced pool boiling curves for water and Ag–water nanofluids with the experimental results of Kathiravan et al. [11]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of CML-produced percent enhancement of heat transfer coefficient versus heat flux for Ag–water nanofluids with the experimental results of Kathiravan et al. [11]

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In