Technical Brief

Comparative Study Between Experimental Data and Numerical Results of Turbulent Mixed Convection in a Ventilated Cavity

[+] Author and Article Information
Norma A. Rodríguez, J. F. Hinojosa

Department of Chemical Engineering and Metallurgy,
University of Sonora,
Boulevard Rosales y Luis Encinas,
Hermosillo, Sonora CP 83000, Mexico
e-mail: fhinojosa@iq.uson.mx

J. Xamán

National Center of Research and Technological Development,
Prol. Av. Palmira S/N. Col. Palmira,
Cuernavaca, Morelos CP 62490, Mexico
e-mail: jxaman@cenidet.edu.mx

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER. Manuscript received October 1, 2013; final manuscript received January 14, 2015; published online February 10, 2015. Assoc. Editor: William P. Klinzing.

J. Heat Transfer 137(5), 054501 (May 01, 2015) (5 pages) Paper No: HT-13-1522; doi: 10.1115/1.4029646 History: Received October 01, 2013; Revised January 14, 2015; Online February 10, 2015

Experimental and numerical results of heat transfer by mixed convection in a ventilated cavity are presented. The results were obtained for a 1.0 m × 1.0 m × 1.0 m cavity. The inlet and outlet dimensions were of 0.08 m × 0.08 m, and the air velocity at the inlet was set to 0.1 and 0.5 m/s. The left wall receives a uniform and constant heat flux whereas the right wall was maintained at a constant temperature. Experimental and numerical results of temperature profiles and heat transfer coefficients are presented and compared. The results showed that the variation of the Rayleigh number increases about 1% the percentage differences between experimental and numerical values, and the maximum percentage differences on heat transfer coefficients are 2.0% for Ra = 2.7 × 108 and 3.0% for Ra = 4.5 × 108.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Physical model of the ventilated cavity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Effect of Rayleigh number on experimental temperature profiles at different heights of the cavity for Re = 31,466

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Effect of Reynolds number on experimental temperature profiles at different heights of the cavity for Ra = 4.50 × 108

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Experimental and numerical profile comparison for Re = 31,466 and Ra = 4.50 × 108




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In