Research Papers

Characterizing Effects of the Shape of Screw Conveyors in Gas–Solid Fluidized Beds Using Advanced Numerical Models

[+] Author and Article Information
Qingang Xiong, Soroush Aramideh, Alberto Passalacqua

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Iowa State University,
Ames, IA 50011

Song-Charng Kong

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Iowa State University,
Ames, IA 50011
e-mail: kong@iastate.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received April 17, 2014; final manuscript received May 30, 2014; published online March 17, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Giulio Lorenzini.

J. Heat Transfer 137(6), 061008 (Jun 01, 2015) (7 pages) Paper No: HT-14-1220; doi: 10.1115/1.4029864 History: Received April 17, 2014; Revised May 30, 2014; Online March 17, 2015

A numerical study of the effects of the shape of an enclosed screw conveyor on the mixing and heat transfer in a horizontal gas–solid fluidized bed was conducted using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). A two-fluid model (TFM) was employed to model the gas and solid phases as continua through mass, momentum, and energy conservations. The motion of the screw conveyor was simulated by using a rotating reference frame (RRF) such that the computational mesh was free from dynamic reconstruction. The diameters of the screw flight and shaft, the pitch, and the blade thickness were varied in the parametric study. Under the operating conditions studied, it was found that the increase in the diameter of the screw flight results in the enhancement of the solid mixing and conveyance. The increase in the diameters of the screw shaft and the screw blade thickness lead to the enhanced solid mixing but reduced conveyance. The variation in the screw pitch gives rise to rather complex behaviors in the solid mixing and conveyance. As the screw pitch is decreased, the solid mixing increases initially but then decreases before it increases eventually. The solid conveyance capability was found to first increase and then decrease. Explanations to the effects of the shape of the screw conveyor were discussed in this work.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Buick, J., 2009, “Lattice Boltzmann Simulation of Power-Law Fluid Flow in the Mixing Section of a Single-Screw Extruder,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 64(1), pp. 52–58. [CrossRef]
Soavi, F., Zurla, O., and Levi, R., 1990, “A New Type of Screw Conveyor for Metallic Chips,” CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., 39(1), pp. 399–404. [CrossRef]
Moysey, P., and Thompson, M., 2004, “Investigation of Solids Transport in a Single-Screw Extruder Using a 3-D Discrete Particle Simulation,” Polym. Eng. Sci., 44(12), pp. 2203–2215. [CrossRef]
Yu, Y., and Arnold, P., 1996, “The Influence of Screw Feeders on Bin Flow Patterns,” Powder Technol., 88(1), pp. 81–87. [CrossRef]
Zhong, Z., and O'Callaghan, J., 1990, “The Effect of the Shape of the Feed Opening on the Performance of a Horizontal Screw Conveyor,” J. Agric. Eng. Res., 46, pp. 125–128. [CrossRef]
Soavi, F., and Zurla, O., 1997, “Performance Evaluation of a New Screw Conveyor for Metal Swarf,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 37(7), pp. 981–996. [CrossRef]
Roberts, A., 1999, “The Influence of Granular Vortex Motion on the Volumetric Performance of Enclosed Screw Conveyors,” Powder Technol., 104(1), pp. 56–67. [CrossRef]
Yu, Y., and Arnold, P., 1997, “Theoretical Modelling of Torque Requirements for Single Screw Feeders,” Powder Technol., 93(2), pp. 151–162. [CrossRef]
Dai, J., and Grace, J. R., 2008, “A Model for Biomass Screw Feeding,” Powder Technol., 186(1), pp. 40–55. [CrossRef]
Waje, S., Thorat, B., and Mujumdar, A., 2006, “An Experimental Study of the Thermal Performance of a Screw Conveyor Dryer,” Drying Technol., 24(3), pp. 293–301. [CrossRef]
Sabarez, H. T., and Noomhorm, A., 1993, “Performance Testing of an Experimental Screw Conveyor Dryer for Roasting Cashew Nuts,” Postharvest Biol. Technol., 2(3), pp. 171–178. [CrossRef]
Waje, S., Patel, A., Thorat, B., and Mujumdar, A., 2007, “Study of Residence Time Distribution in a Pilot-Scale Screw Conveyor Dryer,” Drying Technol., 25(1), pp. 249–259. [CrossRef]
Owen, P., and Cleary, P., 2009, “Prediction of Screw Conveyor Performance Using the Discrete Element Method (DEM),” Powder Technol., 193(3), pp. 274–288. [CrossRef]
Hou, Q., Dong, K., and Yu, A., 2014, “DEM Study of the Flow of Cohesive Particles in a Screw Feeder,” Powder Technol., 256, pp. 529–539. [CrossRef]
Fernandez, J. W., Cleary, P. W., and McBride, W., 2011, “Effect of Screw Design on Hopper Drawdown of Spherical Particles in a Horizontal Screw Feeder,” Chemi. Eng. Sci., 66(22), pp. 5585–5601. [CrossRef]
Dai, J., and Grace, J. R., 2008, “Biomass Screw Feeding With Tapered and Extended Sections,” Powder Technol., 186(1), pp. 56–64. [CrossRef]
Agirre, I., Griessacher, T., Rösler, G., and Antrekowitsch, J., 2013, “Production of Charcoal as an Alternative Reducing Agent From Agricultural Residues Using a Semi-Continuous Semi-Pilot Scale Pyrolysis Screw Reactor,” Fuel Process. Technol., 106, pp. 114–121. [CrossRef]
Brown, J., and Brown, R., 2012, “Process Optimization of an Auger Pyrolyzer With Heat Carrier Using Response Surface Methodology,” Bioresour. Technol., 103(1), pp. 405–414. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wan, Y., and Hanley, T. R., 2004, “Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation and Redesign of a Screw Conveyor Reactor,” Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 114(1–3), pp. 733–745. [CrossRef]
Berson, R. E., and Hanley, T. R., 2005, “Use of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations for Design of a Pretreatment Screw Conveyor Reactor,” Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 124(1–3), pp. 935–945. [CrossRef]
Berson, R. E., Dasari, R. K., and Hanley, T. R., 2006, “Modeling of a Continuous Pretreatment Reactor Using Computational Fluid Dynamics,” Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 130(1–3), pp. 621–630. [CrossRef]
Zhu, G., Tan, W., Yu, Y., and Liu, L., 2013, “Experimental and Numerical Study of the Solid Concentration Distribution in a Horizontal Screw Decanter Centrifuge,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52(48), pp. 17249–17256. [CrossRef]
Xiong, Q., Kong, S.-C., and Passalacqua, A., 2013, “Development of a Generalized Numerical Framework for Simulating Biomass Fast Pyrolysis in Fluidized-Bed Reactors,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 99, pp. 305–313. [CrossRef]
Wang, J., 2009, “A Review of Eulerian Simulation of Geldart A Particles in Gas-Fluidized Beds,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48(12), pp. 5567–5577. [CrossRef]
Xiong, Q., Li, B., Zhou, G., Fang, X., Xu, J., Wang, J., He, X., Wang, X., Wang, L., Ge, W., and Li, J., 2012, “Large-Scale DNS of Gas–Solid Flows on Mole-8.5,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 71, pp. 422–430. [CrossRef]
Xiong, Q., Li, B., Xu, J., Wang, X., Wang, L., and Ge, W., 2012, “Efficient 3D DNS of Gas–Solid Flows on Fermi GPGPU,” Comput. Fluids, 70, pp. 86–94. [CrossRef]
Xiong, Q., Li, B., Chen, F., Ma, J., Ge, W., and Li, J., 2010, “Direct Numerical Simulation of Sub-Grid Structures in Gas–Solid Flow—GPU Implementation of Macro-Scale Pseudo-Particle Modeling,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 65(19), pp. 5356–5365. [CrossRef]
Xu, Y., Padding, J., van der Hoef, M., and Kuipers, J., 2013, “Detailed Numerical Simulation of an Intruder Impacting on a Granular Bed Using a Hybrid Discrete Particle and Immersed Boundary (DP-IB) Method,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 104, pp. 201–207. [CrossRef]
Li, T., Gopalakrishnan, P., Garg, R., and Shahnam, M., 2012, “CFD–DEM Study of Effect of Bed Thickness for Bubbling Fluidized Beds,” Particuology, 10(5), pp. 532–541. [CrossRef]
Mullin, W., and Ragan, R., 2005, “Derivation of Transverse Spin-Wave Dynamics From a Kinetic Equation in a Rotating Reference Frame,” J. Low Temp. Phys., 138(1–2), pp. 73–78. [CrossRef]
Dallen, L., and Neuenschwander, D. E., 2011, “Noether's Theorem in a Rotating Reference Frame,” Am. J. Phys., 79(3), pp. 326–332. [CrossRef]
Lun, C. K. K., Savage, S. B., Jeffrey, D. J., and Chepurniy, N., 1984, “Kinetic Theories for Granular Flow: Inelastic Particles in Couette Flow and Slightly Inelastic Particles in a General Flow Field,” J. Fluid Mech., 140, pp. 223–256. [CrossRef]
Gidaspow, D., 1994, Multiphase Flow and Fluidization: Continuum and Kinetic Theory Descriptions, Academic Press, New York.
Gunn, D., 1978, “Transfer of Heat or Mass to Particles in Fixed and Fluidised Beds,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 21(4), pp. 467–476. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The configuration of the screw conveyor in the fluidized bed reactor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Movement of solid particle on the screw flight due to the partial-slip condition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Temporal evolution of the solid outflux for the case with dout = 0.02 m, din = 0.008 m, pc = 0.03 m, and tc = 0.003 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Relationships of σs and Hs with dout. din = 0.008 m, pc = 0.03 m, and tc = 0.003 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Relationships of σs and Hs with din. dout = 0.02 m, pc = 0.03 m, and tc = 0.003 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Relationships of σs and Hs with pc. dout = 0.02 m, din = 0.008 m, and tc = 0.003 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Relationship between the direction of particle movement and pc

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Relationships of σs and Hs with tc. dout = 0.02 m, din = 0.008 m, and pc = 0.03 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of the flow fields between the case with tc = 0.002 m and the case with tc = 0.005 m




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In