0
Technical Brief

Critical Biot Number of a Periodic Array of Rectangular Fins

[+] Author and Article Information
Marios M. Fyrillas

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Nazarbayev University,
Astana 010000, Republic of Kazakhstan;
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Frederick University,
Nicosia 1303, Cyprus
e-mail: m.fyrillas@gmail.com

Theodoros Leontiou

General Department,
Frederick University,
Nicosia 1303, Cyprus
e-mail: eng.lt@fit.ac.cy

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER. Manuscript received April 28, 2015; final manuscript received August 23, 2015; published online October 13, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Oronzio Manca.

J. Heat Transfer 138(2), 024504 (Oct 13, 2015) (4 pages) Paper No: HT-15-1308; doi: 10.1115/1.4031640 History: Received April 28, 2015; Revised August 23, 2015

We consider the heat transfer problem associated with a periodic array of rectangular fins subjected to convection heat transfer with a uniform heat transfer coefficient. Our analysis differs from the classical approach as (i) we consider two-dimensional (2D) heat conduction and (ii) the wall, to which the fins are attached, is included in the analysis. The problem is modeled as a 2D channel whose upper surface is flat and isothermal, while the lower surface has a periodic array of rectangular extensions/fins which are subjected to heat convection. The Biot number (Bi=h t/k) characterizing the heat transfer process is defined with respect to the thickness of the fins (t). Numerical results suggest that the fins would enhance the heat transfer rate only if the Biot number is less than a critical value which is independent of the thickness of the wall, the length of the fins, and the period; the critical Biot number is approximately equal to 1.64. The optimum fins are infinitely thin and long, and densely packed, i.e., hairlike.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Topics: Fins , Heat transfer
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

A density/contour plot of the temperature field obtained through finite element numerical simulations (Bi = 1.64). The domain and the boundary conditions are indicated in Fig. 2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Effectiveness of rectangular fins (εf) versus Biot number. a: H = 3,Hb = 0.5, and L = 2 ; b: H = 1.5,Hb = 0.1, and L = 2; and c: H = 0.5,Hb = 0.5, and L = 2. All curves cross the line εf = 1 at approximately Bi = 1.64. For Bi = 0, the effectiveness is equal to εf = 2H/L+1 (within numerical error).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Numerical domain and boundary conditions associated with a periodic array of rectangular fins. Note that the domain has been truncated taking into account periodicity/symmetry.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the problem in the physical domain. The fins are of unit span and extend periodically in the horizontal direction. All variables are nondimensional; lengths have been nondimensionalized with the thickness of the fins t. The (dimensionless) thickness of the wall is Hb, the (dimensionless) length of the fin is H, and the (dimensionless) distance between fins is L (period). The nondimensional temperatures are T = 0 at the top boundary and T = 1 at the far field.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In