0
Journal of Heat Transfer | Volume 138 | Issue 3 | research-article
Research Papers: Evaporation, Boiling, and Condensation

Investigation on the Effect of Type and Size of Nanoparticles and Surfactant on Pool Boiling Heat Transfer of Nanofluids

[+] Author and Article Information
Tofigh Sayahi

Department of Chemical Engineering,
Faculty of Engineering,
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM),
Mashhad 9177948974, Iran
e-mail: tofighsayahi@yahoo.com

Masoud Bahrami

Department of Chemical Engineering,
Petroleum University of Technology,
Ahwaz 6198144471, Iran

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER. Manuscript received October 20, 2014; final manuscript received September 22, 2015; published online November 17, 2015. Assoc. Editor: W. Q. Tao.

J. Heat Transfer 138(3), 031502 (Nov 17, 2015) (9 pages) Paper No: HT-14-1693; doi: 10.1115/1.4031883 History: Received October 20, 2014; Revised September 22, 2015
Article
References
Figures
Tables
Citing Articles

In our efforts to improve the pool boiling heat transfer of water, three sets of experiments are carried out to investigate the best coolant for heat removal among alumina, silica, and zinc oxide as nanoparticles and water as base fluid: (a) pool boiling heat transfer of γ-alumina/water nanofluid with and without surfactant in both distilled water and treated water as base fluids, (b) pool boiling heat transfer of silica/water nanofluid with two different nanoparticle sizes, and (c) pool boiling heat transfer of zinc oxide/water nanofluid with surfactant. In all the above experiments, the effect of heater surface on boiling heat transfer coefficient has been investigated by repeating the experiment using pure water on the coated surface before cleaning it. Moreover, two effective thermophysical properties of fluids, dynamic viscosity and surface tension, are measured to explain the boiling behavior of the nanofluids. The experimental results indicate that (a) the presence of γ-alumina in the base fluid enhances the pool boiling heat transfer coefficient, but sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) as surfactant deteriorates the performance of pool boiling heat transfer of γ-alumina/water nanofluid and (b) silica nanoparticles reduce the boiling performance of pure water. Moreover, the larger particle size of silica nanoparticles shows less reduction in heat transfer coefficient, (c) zinc oxide/water nanofluid is the best coolant among all the above-mentioned nanoparticles for heat removal.
FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

1
Cho, H. J. , Sresht, V. , Blankschtein, D. , and Wang, E. N. , 2013, “ Understanding Enhanced Boiling With Triton X Surfactants,” ASME Paper No. HT2013-17497.
2
Chol, S. , 1995, “ Enhancing Thermal Conductivity of Fluids With Nanoparticles,” ASME-Publ. Fed., 231, pp. 99–106.
3
Sadhu, S. , and Ghoshdastidar, P. , 2015, “ Heat Flux Controlled Pool Boiling of Zirconia–Water and Silver–Water Nanofluids on a Flat Plate: A Coupled Map Lattice Simulation,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 137(2), p. 021503. [CrossRef]
4
Yang, Y. M. , and Maa, J. R. , 1984, “ Boiling of Suspension of Solid Particles in Water,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 27(1), pp. 145–147. [CrossRef]
5
Das, S. K. , Putra, N. , and Roetzel, W. , 2003, “ Pool Boiling Characteristics of Nano-Fluids,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 46(5), pp. 851–862. [CrossRef]
6
Vassallo, P. , Kumar, R. , and D'Amico, S. , 2004, “ Pool Boiling Heat Transfer Experiments in Silica–Water Nano-Fluids,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 47(2), pp. 407–411. [CrossRef]
7
Marto, P. , and Lepere, V. , 1982, “ Pool Boiling Heat Transfer From Enhanced Surfaces to Dielectric Fluids,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 104(2), pp. 292–299. [CrossRef]
8
Tong, L. S. , and Tang, Y. S. , 1997, Boiling Heat Transfer and Two-Phase Flow, Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC.
9
Sulaiman, M. Z. , Takamura, M. , Nakahashi, K. , and Okawa, T. , 2013, “ Boiling Heat Transfer and Critical Heat Flux Enhancement of Upward- and Downward-Facing Heater in Nanofluids,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(7), p. 072901. [CrossRef]
10
Kwark, S. M. , Kumar, R. , Moreno, G. , and You, S. M. , 2012, “ Transient Characteristics of Pool Boiling Heat Transfer in Nanofluids,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 134(5), p. 051015. [CrossRef]
11
Kedzierski, M. A. , 1996, “ Enhancement of R-123 Pool Boiling by the Addition of n-Hexane,” Building and Fire Research Laboratory, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD.
12
Murshed, S. S. , Milanova, D. , and Kumar, R. , 2009, “ An Experimental Study of Surface Tension-Dependent Pool Boiling Characteristics of Carbon Nanotubes–Nanofluids,” ASME Paper No. ICNMM2009-82204.
13
Zhou, L. , Wei, L. , and Du, X. , 2013, “ Subcooled Nucleate Boiling of Alumina Nanofluid With/Without n-Butanol as Surfactant,” ASME Paper No. HT2013-17754.
14
Wasekar, V. M. , 2001, “ Nucleate Pool Boiling Heat Transfer in Aqueous Surfactant Solutions,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
15
Al-Sabagh, A. , Azzam, E. , Nasser, N. , and El-Shafey, A. , 2009, “ Investigation Static/Dynamic Surface and Interfacial Tension of Some Synthesized Polymeric Surfactants to Enhance the Egyptian Jet Fuel A1 Atomization,” J. Dispersion Sci. Technol., 30(4), pp. 520–528. [CrossRef]
16
Zhang, J. , 2004, “ Experimental and Computational Study of Nucleate Pool Boiling Heat Transfer in Aqueous Surfactant and Polymer Solutions,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
17
Gowda, R. , Sun, H. , Wang, P. , Charmchi, M. , Gao, F. , Gu, Z. , and Budhlall, B. , 2010, “ Effects of Particle Surface Charge, Species, Concentration, and Dispersion Method on the Thermal Conductivity of Nanofluids,” Adv. Mech. Eng., 2, p. 807610.
18
Ammerman, C. , and You, S. , 1996, “ Determination of the Boiling Enhancement Mechanism Caused by Surfactant Addition to Water,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 118(2), pp. 429–435. [CrossRef]
19
Wen, D. , and Ding, Y. , 2004, “ Experimental Investigation Into Convective Heat Transfer of Nanofluids at the Entrance Region Under Laminar Flow Conditions,” Int. J. Heat mass Transfer, 47(24), pp. 5181–5188. [CrossRef]
20
Kole, M. , and Dey, T. , 2010, “ Thermal Conductivity and Viscosity of Al2O3 Nanofluid Based on Car Engine Coolant,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 43(31), p. 315501. [CrossRef]
21
Kathiravan, R. , Kumar, R. , Gupta, A. , Chandra, R. , and Jain, P. , 2011, “ Pool Boiling Characteristics of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Based Nanofluids Over a Flat Plate Heater,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 54(5), pp. 1289–1296. [CrossRef]
22
Kathiravan, R. , Kumar, R. , Gupta, A. , and Chandra, R. , 2010, “ Preparation and Pool Boiling Characteristics of Copper Nanofluids Over a Flat Plate Heater,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 53(9), pp. 1673–1681. [CrossRef]
23
Shoghl, S. N. , and Bahramim, M. , 2013, “ Experimental Investigation on Pool Boiling Heat Transfer of ZnO, and CuO Water-Based Nanofluids and Effect of Surfactant on Heat Transfer Coefficient,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 45, pp. 122–129. [CrossRef]
24
Shanbedi, M. , Heris, S. Z. , Amiri, A. , and Baniadam, M. , 2014, “ Improvement in Heat Transfer of a Two-Phased Closed Thermosyphon Using Silver-Decorated MWCNT/Water,” J. Dispersion Sci. Technol., 35(8), pp. 1086–1096. [CrossRef]
25
Verma, U. , Manglik, R. , and Jog, M. , 2011, “ Experimental Study of Effects of Interfacial Properties on Nucleate Pool Boiling in Water,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2011-62740.
26
Narayan, G. P. , Anoop, K. , and Das, S. K. , 2007, “ Mechanism of Enhancement/Deterioration of Boiling Heat Transfer Using Stable Nanoparticle Suspensions Over Vertical Tubes,” J. Appl. Phys., 102(7), p. 074317. [CrossRef]
27
Wen, D. , 2012, “ Influence of Nanoparticles on Boiling Heat Transfer,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 41, pp. 2–9. [CrossRef]
28
Hu, H. , Peng, H. , and Ding, G. , 2013, “ Nucleate Pool Boiling Heat Transfer Characteristics of Refrigerant/Nanolubricant Mixture With Surfactant,” Int. J. Refrig., 36(3), pp. 1045–1055. [CrossRef]
29
Sarafraz, M. , and Hormozi, F. , 2014, “ Nucleate Pool Boiling Heat Transfer Characteristics of Dilute Al2O3–Ethyleneglycol Nanofluids,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 58, pp. 96–104. [CrossRef]
30
Ahmadi, H. , 2012, “ Experimental Investigation on Heat Transfer Phenomena in Nanofluid,” M.Sc. thesis, Petroleum University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
31
Jamialahmadi, M. , Helalizadeh, A. , and Müller-Steinhagen, H. , 2004, “ Pool Boiling Heat Transfer to Electrolyte Solutions,” Int. J. Heat mass Transfer, 47(4), pp. 729–742. [CrossRef]
32
Feldmann, H. , and Luke, A. , 2008, “ Nucleate Boiling in Water for Different Pressures,” International Refrigation and Air Conditioning Conference.
33
Hetsroni, G. , Zakin, J. , Lin, Z. , Mosyak, A. , Pancallo, E. , and Rozenblit, R. , 2000, “ The Effect of Surfactants on Bubble Growth, Wall Thermal Patterns and Heat Transfer in Pool Boiling,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 44(2), pp. 485–497. [CrossRef]
34
Jones, B. J. , McHale, J. P. , and Garimella, S. V. , 2009, “ The Influence of Surface Roughness on Nucleate Pool Boiling Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 131(12), p. 121009. [CrossRef]
35
Wu, W.-T. , Yang, Y.-M. , and Maa, J.-R. , 1999, “ Technical Note Pool Boiling Incipience and Vapor Bubble Growth Dynamics in Surfactant Solutions,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 42(13), pp. 2483–2488. [CrossRef]
36
Moffat, R. J. , 1988, “ Describing the Uncertainties in Experimental Results,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 1(1), pp. 3–17. [CrossRef]
37
White, S. B. , Shih, A. J. , and Pipe, K. P. , 2010, “ Effects of Nanoparticle Layering on Nanofluid and Base Fluid Pool Boiling Heat Transfer From a Horizontal Surface Under Atmospheric Pressure,” J. Appl. Phys., 107(11), p. 114302. [CrossRef]
38
Bergman, T. L. , Lavine, A. S. , Incropera, F. P. , and DeWitt, D. P. , 2011, Introduction to Heat Transfer, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
39
Milanova, D. , and Kumar, R. , 2005, “ Role of Ions in Pool Boiling Heat Transfer of Pure and Silica Nanofluids,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 87(23), p. 233107. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

TEM images of nanoparticles: (a) γ-alumina, (b) silica1, (c) silica2, and (d) zinc oxide

+TEM images of nanoparticles: (a) γ-alumina, (b) silica1, (c) silica2, and (d) zinc oxide
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
TEM images of nanoparticles: (a) γ-alumina, (b) silica1, (c) silica2, and (d) zinc oxide
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Surface roughness evaluation of different parts of clean rod heater by AFM images [30]

+Surface roughness evaluation of different parts of clean rod heater by AFM images [30]
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Surface roughness evaluation of different parts of clean rod heater by AFM images [30]
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic diagram of pool boiling apparatus

+Schematic diagram of pool boiling apparatus
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Schematic diagram of pool boiling apparatus
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic of rod heater

+Schematic of rod heater
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Schematic of rod heater
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Flow mode of nanofluid ultrasonication [30]

+Flow mode of nanofluid ultrasonication [30]
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Flow mode of nanofluid ultrasonication [30]
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Boiling regimes progress from free-convection boiling to transition boiling: (a) 14.102 kW/m2, (b) 57.856 kW/m2, (c) 130.176 kW/m2, (d) 202.949 kW/m2, and (e) 329.209 kW/m2

+Boiling regimes progress from free-convection boiling to transition boiling: (a) 14.102 kW/m2, (b) 57.856 kW/m2, (c) 130.176 kW/m2, (d) 202.949 kW/m2, and (e) 329.209 kW/m2
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Boiling regimes progress from free-convection boiling to transition boiling: (a) 14.102 kW/m2, (b) 57.856 kW/m2, (c) 130.176 kW/m2, (d) 202.949 kW/m2, and (e) 329.209 kW/m2
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Different experiments conducted with treated water on clean heater

+Different experiments conducted with treated water on clean heater
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Different experiments conducted with treated water on clean heater
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Dynamic viscosity as a function of temperature

+Dynamic viscosity as a function of temperature
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Dynamic viscosity as a function of temperature
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Pool boiling curve (a) and boiling heat transfer coefficient curve (b) of γ-Al2O3 nanofluid

+Pool boiling curve (a) and boiling heat transfer coefficient curve (b) of γ-Al2O3 nanofluid
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Pool boiling curve (a) and boiling heat transfer coefficient curve (b) of γ-Al2O3 nanofluid
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Surface tension of different nanofluids at 28 °C

+Surface tension of different nanofluids at 28 °C
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Surface tension of different nanofluids at 28 °C
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Pool boiling curve (a) and boiling heat transfer coefficient curve (b) of silica nanofluid

+Pool boiling curve (a) and boiling heat transfer coefficient curve (b) of silica nanofluid
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Pool boiling curve (a) and boiling heat transfer coefficient curve (b) of silica nanofluid
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Dynamic viscosity of silica nanoparticles as a function of temperature

+Dynamic viscosity of silica nanoparticles as a function of temperature
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Dynamic viscosity of silica nanoparticles as a function of temperature
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Pool boiling curve (a) and boiling heat transfer coefficient curve (b) of ZnO nanofluid

+Pool boiling curve (a) and boiling heat transfer coefficient curve (b) of ZnO nanofluid
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Pool boiling curve (a) and boiling heat transfer coefficient curve (b) of ZnO nanofluid
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Dynamic viscosity of zinc oxide nanoparticles as a function of temperature

+Dynamic viscosity of zinc oxide nanoparticles as a function of temperature
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Dynamic viscosity of zinc oxide nanoparticles as a function of temperature

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Rheological Behaviour and Heat Transfer of Al2O3 Nanoparticles Dispersed in Ethylene Glycol and Water Mixture
Inaugural US-EU-China Thermophysics Conference-Renewable Energy 2009 (UECTC 2009 Proceedings)
Introduction
Heat Transfer & Hydraulic Resistance at Supercritical Pressures in Power Engineering Applications> Chapter 1
Summary
Heat Transfer & Hydraulic Resistance at Supercritical Pressures in Power Engineering Applications> Chapter 16
Liquid Cooled Systems
Thermal Management of Telecommunications Equipment> Chapter 9
Application of Universal Functions
Applications of Mathematical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow Models in Engineering and Medicine
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. | Accept
Sign In