0
Research Papers: Evaporation, Boiling, and Condensation

Enhanced Heat Transfer and Fouling Propensity of Diamond-Like Carbon Coated Smooth and Finned Tubes During External Nucleate Boiling

[+] Author and Article Information
M. Reza Malayeri

School of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering,
Shiraz University,
Shiraz, Iran;
Institute of Process and
Environment Engineering,
Technische Universität Dresden,
Dresden 01069, Germany
e-mails: malayeri@shirazu.ac.ir; reza.malayeri@tu-dresden.de

M. Evangelidou

Institute of Thermodynamics and
Thermal Engineering (ITW),
University of Stuttgart,
Pfaffenwaldring 6,
Stuttgart D-70550, Germany

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER. Manuscript received October 21, 2015; final manuscript received March 23, 2016; published online April 26, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Amitabh Narain.

J. Heat Transfer 138(8), 081502 (Apr 26, 2016) (7 pages) Paper No: HT-15-1663; doi: 10.1115/1.4033210 History: Received October 21, 2015; Revised March 23, 2016

Smooth DLC (diamond-like carbon) coated surfaces can profoundly mitigate scaling during pool boiling of calcium sulphate solutions. Previous investigations though carried out mostly for the smooth surfaces rather than structured, i.e., finned tubes. This study compares experimental results of DLC coated smooth and finned tubes at clean and fouling conditions. Fouling runs were conducted during pool boiling of saturated CaSO4 solution of 1.6 g/L at 300 kW/m2. The substrate of the attempted tubes was stainless steel and finned tubes of 19 and 40 fins per inch were used. The DLC coated smooth tube showed an enhanced clean heat transfer up to 50% and reduced fouling resistance compared to the uncoated smooth tube. After a short operating time, though, the coated smooth tube reached an asymptotic fouling resistance of 0.00005 m2 K/W whereas for the uncoated smooth tube, it was 4.8 times higher. DLC coating of the finned tubes with the physical vapor deposition (PVD) technique implicated difficulties. The base surface of the finned tubes was defectively coated. The defectiveness of the coating was attributed to the limitation of the PVD for coating of structured surfaces.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Esawy, M. , 2011, “ Fouling of Structured Surfaces During Pool Boiling of Aqueous Solutions,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Behbahani, R. M. , Müller-Steinhagen, H. , and Jamialahmadi, M. , 2005, “ Heat Exchanger Fouling in Phosphoric Acid Evaporators,” Heat Transfer Eng., 28, pp. 292–298. [CrossRef]
Jamialahmadi, M. , and Müller-Steinhagen, H. , 2004, “ A New Model for the Effect of Calcium Sulfate Scale Formation on Pool Boiling Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 126(4), pp. 507–517. [CrossRef]
Müller-Steinhagen, H. , Malayeri, M. R. , and Watkinson, A. P. , 2011, “ Heat Exchanger Fouling: Cleaning and Mitigation Techniques,” Heat Transfer Eng., 32, pp. 189–196. [CrossRef]
Mohammadi, K. , and Malayeri, M. R. , 2015, “ Model-Based Performance of Turbulence Induced Structures in Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) Coolers,” Heat Transfer Eng., 36, pp. 706–714. [CrossRef]
Herz, A. , Malayeri, M. R. , and Müller-Steinhagen, H. , 2008, “ Fouling of Roughened Stainless Steel Surfaces During Convective Heat Transfer to Aqueous Solutions,” Energy Convers. Manage., 49(11), pp. 3381–3386. [CrossRef]
Malayeri, M. R. , Al-Janabi, A. , and Müller-Steinhagen, H. , 2009, “ Application of Nano-Modified Surfaces for Fouling Mitigation,” Int. J. Energy Res., 33(13), pp. 1101–1113. [CrossRef]
Webb, R. , 2005, Principles of Enhanced Heat Transfer, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Somerscales, E. , and Bergles, A. , 1997, “ Enhancement of Heat Transfer and Fouling Mitigation,” Adv. Heat Transfer, 30, pp. 197–253.
Esawy, M. , Malayeri, M. R. , and Müller-Steinhagen, H. , 2010, “ Crystallization Fouling of Finned Tubes During Pool Boiling: Effect of Fin Density,” J. Heat Mass Transfer, 46(10), pp. 1167–1176. [CrossRef]
Evangelidou, M. , Esawy, M. , and Malayeri, M. R. , 2013, “ Impact of Heat Shock on Fouling of Various Structured Tubes During Heat Transfer Boiling of CaSO4 Solutions,” Heat Transfer Eng., 34, pp. 776–785. [CrossRef]
Thome, J. R. , 1990, Enhanced Boiling Heat Transfer, Hemisphere, New York.
Bejan, A. , and Kraus, A. D. , 2003, Heat Transfer Handbook, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Gorenflo, D. , 2006, “ Behältersieden (Sieden in freier Konvektion),” Hab VDI-Wärmeatlas, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Zhao, Q. , and Wang, X. , 2004, “ Heat Transfer Surfaces Coated With Fluorinated Diamond-Like Carbon Films to Minimize Scale Formation,” Surf. Coat. Technol., 192, pp. 77–80. [CrossRef]
Balzer, F. , Wenzel, U. , Jamialahmadi, M. , and Müller-Steinhagen, H. , 1993, “ Einfluß der Heizflächenbeschichtung auf den Wärmeübergangskoeffizienten beim Behältersieden von Wasser, Isopropanol, Azeton und deren Mischungen,” Wärme- Stoffübertragung, 28(8), pp. 465–470. [CrossRef]
Griffith, P. , and Wallis, G. D. , 1960, “ The Role of Surface Conditions in Nucleate Boiling,” Chem. Eng. Prog., Symp. Ser., 56, pp. 49–63.
Vachon, R. I. , Nix, G. H. , Tanger, G. E. , and Cobb, R. E. , 1969, “ Pool Boiling Heat Transfer From Teflon-Coated Stainless Steel,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 91(3), pp. 364–370. [CrossRef]
Young, R. K. , and Hummel, R. L. , 1965, “ Improved Nucleate Boiling Heat Transfer,” Chem. Eng. Prog., 60, pp. 53–58.
Najibi, S. H. , Jamialahmadi, M. , and Müller-Steinhagen, H. , 1996, “ Boiling and Nonboiling Heat Transfer to Electrolyte Solutions,” Heat Transfer Eng., 17(4), pp. 46–63. [CrossRef]
Fahlman, B. D. , 2007, Materials Chemistry, Springer, New York. [PubMed] [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Sketch of the boiling rig

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Bubble behavior on smooth tube during boiling of (a) distilled water and (b) 1.0 g/L CaSO4 solution at 100 kW/m2 at clean condition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

A DLC 19 fpi coated tube before and after cleaning with water and a soft brush

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Construction of investigated tubes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Heat transfer coefficient of uncoated and DLC coated 19 fpi tube during boiling of 1.6 g/L CaSO4 under clean conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Heat transfer coefficient of uncoated and DLC coated 40 fpi tube during boiling of 1.6 g/L CaSO4 under clean conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Fouling behavior of uncoated and coated smooth tubes with time during boiling of 1.6 g/L CaSO4 at 300 kW/m2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Fouling layer on DLC coated smooth tube after 3928 min boiling of 1.6 g/L CaSO4 solution at 300 kW/m2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Fouling behavior of uncoated and DLC coated 19 fpi tube with time during boiling of 1.6 g/L CaSO4 at 300 kW/m2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of bubble behavior on DLC coated and uncoated stainless steel tubes during boiling of distilled water at different heat fluxes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Heat transfer coefficient of uncoated and DLC coated smooth tube during boiling of 1.6 g/L CaSO4 at different heat fluxes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Heat transfer coefficient of uncoated and DLC coated smooth tube during boiling of distilled water at different heat fluxes

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In