0
Research Papers: Micro/Nanoscale Heat Transfer

Thermal and Hydrodynamic Performance of Aqueous CuO and Al2O3 Nanofluids in an Annular Coiled Tube Under Constant Wall Temperature and Laminar Flow Conditions

[+] Author and Article Information
Wael I. A. Aly

Department of Refrigeration and
Air Conditioning Technology,
Faculty of Industrial Education,
Helwan University,
Cairo 11282, Egypt
e-mails: aly_wael@helwan.edu.eg;
aly_wael@yahoo.com

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER. Manuscript received January 22, 2015; final manuscript received May 4, 2016; published online June 7, 2016. Assoc. Editor: P. K. Das.

J. Heat Transfer 138(10), 102401 (Jun 07, 2016) (11 pages) Paper No: HT-15-1063; doi: 10.1115/1.4033613 History: Received January 22, 2015; Revised May 04, 2016

Laminar flow and heat transfer behaviors of two different metal oxide, Al2O3 (36 nm) and CuO (29 nm), nanofluids flowing through an annular coiled tube heat exchanger (ACTHE) with constant wall temperature boundary condition have been numerically studied to evaluate their superiority over the base fluid (water). Simulations covered a range of nanoparticles volume concentrations of 1.0–6.0% and mass flow rates from 0.025 to 0.125 kg/s. Numerical results indicated that a considerable heat transfer enhancement is achieved by both nanofluids. Results at the same Reynolds number for the pressure drop and heat transfer coefficient show an increase with increasing particle volumetric concentration. The maximum enhancements in heat transfer coefficient were 44.8% and 18.9% for CuO/water and Al2O3/water, respectively. On the other hand, the pressure loss was seven times in comparison to water for CuO/water and about two times for Al2O3/water nanofluid. Also, comparing to the base fluid, nanofluids at low concentrations (up to 3%) can provide the same heat transfer amount at lower pumping power. The overall performance of the enhanced heat transfer technique utilized has been evaluated using a thermohydrodynamic performance index which indicated that Al2O3/water nanofluid is a better choice than CuO/water nanofluid. Moreover, conventional correlations for helical circular tubes for predicting friction factor and average heat transfer in laminar flow regime such as the correlations of Mori and Nakayam and Manlapaz and Churcill, respectively, are also valid for water and the tested nanofluids with small nanoparticle loading in the ACTHE.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Geometrical parameters and grid system of the annular coiled tube

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Number of grids versus Nu and f

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

(a) Heat transfer coefficient versus Reynolds number, (b) heat transfer coefficient versus mass flow rate, (c) heat transfer coefficient versus pumping power, (d) friction factor versus Reynolds number, (e) friction factor versus mass flow rate, (f) pressure drop versus mass flow rate, and (g) pressure drop versus Re

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Friction factors versus Re: (a) isothermal flow and (b) nonisothermal flow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Validation: (a) water and (b) nanofluids

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Variation of (a) performance index and (b) merit criterion Cμ/Ck with mass flow rate

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In