0
Research Papers: Jets, Wakes, and Impingment Cooling

The Statistical Analysis of Droplet Train Splashing After Impinging on a Superheated Surface

[+] Author and Article Information
Lu Qiu, Swapnil Dubey, Fook Hoong Choo

Energy Research Institute @ NTU,
Nanyang Technological University,
1 Cleantech Loop, 06-04 Cleantech One,
Singapore 637141, Singapore

Fei Duan

School of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
Nanyang Technological University,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798, Singapore
e-mail: feiduan@ntu.edu.sg

1Corresponding author.

Presented at the 2016 ASME 5th Micro/Nanoscale Heat & Mass Transfer International Conference. Paper No. MNHMT2016-6436. Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER. Manuscript received June 4, 2016; final manuscript received December 24, 2016; published online February 23, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Zhuomin Zhang.

J. Heat Transfer 139(5), 052201 (Feb 23, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: HT-16-1354; doi: 10.1115/1.4035661 History: Received June 04, 2016; Revised December 24, 2016

An orderly droplet splashing is established when a water droplet train impinges onto a superheated copper surface. The droplets continuously impinge onto the surface with a rate of 40,000 Hz, a diameter of 96 μm or 120 μm, and a velocity of 8.4 m/s or 14.5 m/s. The heat transfers under different wall temperatures are measured, and the corresponding droplet splashing is recorded and analyzed. The effects of wall temperature, droplet Weber number, and surface roughness on the transition of the droplet splashing are investigated. The results suggest that the transferred energy is kept a constant in the transition regime, but a sudden drop of around 25% is observed when it steps into post-transition regime, indicating that the Leidenfrost point is reached. A higher Weber number of droplet train results in a more stable splashing angle and a wider range of splashed droplet diameter. The surface roughness plays no significant role in influencing the splashing angle in the high Weber number case, but the rougher surface elevates the fluctuation of the splashing angle in the low Weber number case. On the rougher surface, the temporary accumulation of the impact droplets is observed, a “huge” secondary droplet can be formed and released. The continuous generation of the huge droplets is observed at a higher wall temperature. Based on the result of droplet tracking of the splashed secondary droplets, the diameter and velocity are correlated.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Yarin, A. , 2006, “ Drop Impact Dynamics: Splashing, Spreading, Receding, Bouncing?” Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 38(1), pp. 159–192. [CrossRef]
Rioboo, R. , Tropea, C. , and Marengo, M. , 2001, “ Outcomes From a Drop Impact on Solid Surfaces,” Atomization Sprays, 11(2), pp. 155–166. [CrossRef]
Bird, J. C. , Tsai, S. S. , and Stone, H. A. , 2009, “ Inclined to Splash: Triggering and Inhibiting a Splash With Tangential Velocity,” New J. Phys., 11(6), p. 063017. [CrossRef]
Wal, R. V. , Berger, G. , and Mozes, S. , 2006, “ The Splash/Non-Splash Boundary Upon a Dry Surface and Thin Fluid Film,” Exp. Fluids, 40(1), pp. 53–59. [CrossRef]
Rioboo, R. , Bauthier, C. , Conti, J. , Voue, M. , and De Coninck, J. , 2003, “ Experimental Investigation of Splash and Crown Formation During Single Drop Impact on Wetted Surfaces,” Exp. Fluids, 35(6), pp. 648–652. [CrossRef]
Gao, X. , and Li, R. , 2015, “ Impact of a Single Drop on a Flowing Liquid Film,” Phys. Rev. E, 92(5), p. 053005. [CrossRef]
Lee, C. H. , and Kim, K. C. , 2014, “ Impinging Characteristics of Water Droplet on Hot Surface: Effect of Wall Inclination,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 136(8), p. 080908. [CrossRef]
Wang, Z. , Lopez, C. , Hirsa, A. , and Koratkar, N. , 2007, “ Impact Dynamics and Rebound of Water Droplets on Superhydrophobic Carbon Nanotube Arrays,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 91(2), p. 023105. [CrossRef]
Deng, T. , Varanasi, K. K. , Hsu, M. , Bhate, N. , Keimel, C. , Stein, J. , and Blohm, M. , 2009, “ Nonwetting of Impinging Droplets on Textured Surfaces,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 94(13), p. 133109. [CrossRef]
Lee, J. B. , and Lee, S. H. , 2011, “ Dynamic Wetting and Spreading Characteristics of a Liquid Droplet Impinging on Hydrophobic Textured Surfaces,” Langmuir, 27(11), pp. 6565–6573. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Alizadeh, A. , Bahadur, V. , Zhong, S. , Shang, W. , Li, R. , Ruud, J. , Yamada, M. , Ge, L. , Dhinojwala, A. , and Sohal, M. , 2012, “ Temperature Dependent Droplet Impact Dynamics on Flat and Textured Surfaces,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 100(11), p. 111601. [CrossRef]
Shen, J. , Graber, C. , Liburdy, J. , Pence, D. , and Narayanan, V. , 2010, “ Simultaneous Droplet Impingement Dynamics and Heat Transfer on Nano-Structured Surfaces,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 34(4), pp. 496–503. [CrossRef]
Lee, J. B. , Lee, S. H. , and Choi, C. K. , 2011, “ Dynamic Spreading of a Droplet Impinging on Micro-Textured Surfaces,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 133(8), p. 080905. [CrossRef]
Negeed, E.-S. R. , Albeirutty, M. , Al-Sharif, S. F. , Hidaka, S. , and Takata, Y. , 2016, “ Dynamic Behavior of a Small Water Droplet Impact Onto a Heated Hydrophilic Surface,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 138(4), p. 042901. [CrossRef]
Park, J. Y. , Gardner, A. , King, W. P. , and Cahill, D. G. , 2014, “ Droplet Impingement and Vapor Layer Formation on Hot Hydrophobic Surfaces,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 136(9), p. 092902. [CrossRef]
Khavari, M. , Sun, C. , Lohse, D. , and Tran, T. , 2015, “ Fingering Patterns During Droplet Impact on Heated Surfaces,” Soft Matter, 11(17), pp. 3298–3303. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Li, L. , Jia, X. , Liu, Y. , and Su, M. , 2016, “ Simulation of Double Droplets Impact on Liquid Film by a Simplified Lattice Boltzmann Model,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 98, pp. 656–669. [CrossRef]
Yarin, A. , and Weiss, D. , 1995, “ Impact of Drops on Solid Surfaces: Self-Similar Capillary Waves, and Splashing as a New Type of Kinematic Discontinuity,” J. Fluid Mech., 283, pp. 141–173. [CrossRef]
Sellers, S. M. , and Black, W. , 2008, “ Boiling Heat Transfer Rates for Small Precisely Placed Water Droplets on a Heated Horizontal Plate,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 130(5), p. 054504. [CrossRef]
Trujillo, M. F. , Alvarado, J. , Gehring, E. , and Soriano, G. S. , 2011, “ Numerical Simulations and Experimental Characterization of Heat Transfer From a Periodic Impingement of Droplets,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 133(12), p. 122201. [CrossRef]
Trujillo, M. F. , and Lewis, S. R. , 2012, “ Thermal Boundary Layer Analysis Corresponding to Droplet Train Impingement,” Phys. Fluids, 24(11), p. 112102. [CrossRef]
Muthusamy, J. P. , Zhang, T. , Alvarado, J. , Kanjirakat, A. , and Sadr, R. , 2016, “ Effects of High Frequency Droplet Train Impingement on Crown Propagation Dynamics and Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 138(2), p. 020903. [CrossRef]
Zhang, T. , Muthusamy, J. P. , Alvarado, J. L. , Kanjirakat, A. , and Sadr, R. , 2016, “ Numerical and Experimental Investigations of Crown Propagation Dynamics Induced by Droplet Train Impingement,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 57, pp. 24–33. [CrossRef]
Zhang, T. , Alvarado, J. , Muthusamy, J. P. , Kanjirakat, A. , and Sadr, R. , 2016, “ Effects of High Frequency Droplet Train Impingement on Spreading-Splashing Transition, Film Hydrodynamics, and Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 138(2), p. 020902. [CrossRef]
Zhang, T. , Alvarado, J. , Muthusamy, J. P. , Kanjirakat, A. , and Sadr, R. , 2016, “ Effects of Screen Laminates on Droplet-Induced Film Hydrodynamics and Surface Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 138(8), p. 080902. [CrossRef]
Dunand, P. , Castanet, G. , Gradeck, M. , Lemoine, F. , and Maillet, D. , 2013, “ Heat Transfer of Droplets Impinging Onto a Wall Above the Leidenfrost Temperature,” C. R. Méc., 341(1), pp. 75–87. [CrossRef]
Park, J. Y. , Min, C.-K. , Granick, S. , and Cahill, D. G. , 2012, “ Residence Time and Heat Transfer When Water Droplets Hit a Scalding Surface,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 134(10), p. 101503. [CrossRef]
Gradeck, M. , Seiler, N. , Ruyer, P. , and Maillet, D. , 2013, “ Heat Transfer for Leidenfrost Drops Bouncing Onto a Hot Surface,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 47, pp. 14–25. [CrossRef]
Qiu, L. , Dubey, S. , Choo, F. H. , and Duan, F. , 2015, “ Splashing of High Speed Droplet Train Impinging on a Hot Surface,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 107(16), p. 164102. [CrossRef]
Qiu, L. , Dubey, S. , Choo, F. H. , and Duan, F. , 2016, “ The Transitions of Time-Independent Spreading Diameter and Splashing Angle When a Droplet Train Impinging Onto a Hot Surface,” RSC Adv., 6(17), pp. 13644–13652. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) The schematics of experimental system, which includes (1) compressed air supply, (2) pressure vessel filled with DI water, (3) flow meter and pressure gauge, (4) nozzle, (5) function generator, (6) lamp, (7) high-speed camera, (8) copper rod, (9) temperature measurements and data acquisition unit, (10) cartridge heaters, (11) AC power supply. The measured surface profile of the (b) rougher surface (furnished by sandpaper #120) and the (c) smoother surface (furnished by sandpaper #1200).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The image is analyzed with matlab, in which (a) the sharp edges are detected, (b) the centroid and diameter of each white color area are calculated after filling the closed curves, and then (c) the splashing angle is fitted from the detected secondary droplets. After the initial fitting, the far-field secondary droplets are ruled out, and a second fitting is conducted with the survived droplets.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The velocity vectors of the splashed droplets in 200 frames. The background is a typical frame as the reference. Every three consecutive frames are employed to track the secondary droplets.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

ΔTtc and Q˙ as a function of surface temperature. A sudden drop of the heating power is observed at the end of the transition regime. The inset shows the calibration results.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The splashing angle (a) before and (b) after the transition are significantly different. (c) The continuous recording shows that there is a fluctuation in splashing angle, but the mean splashing angle decreases linearly with an increase in wall temperature in the transition zone (100 fps).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The variation of the maximum diameter of the splashed droplet in each frame (100 fps)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Aside from the normal splashing (a), the huge droplets are created (b) and (c). On the rougher surface, the huge droplet is occasionally formed but departures very quick, after which the splashing is re-established (b). At higher wall temperature, the extreme droplets are continuously generated and there is no splashing at all (c). However, on the smoother surface, the pattern (b) is not observed, and pattern (c) is observed at a higher temperature (100 fps).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The location of the largest splashed droplet in eachframe. The low Weber number cases are more chaotic (100 fps).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The variation of the splashing angle in 1000 frames (2857 droplets impinge onto the surface). The splashing angle is statistically time-independent (14,000 fps).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The distribution of the splashing angle (14,000 fps)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The distribution of (a) the splashed droplet diameter and (b) the splashed droplet velocity (14,000 fps). (c) The diameter of the splashed droplet against the splashed velocity of the same secondary droplet. A clear boundary of the distribution could be distinguished, indicating that those two parameters are not independent.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In