0
Research Papers: Forced Convection

The Reasons of Heat Transfer Enhancement in a Laminar Channel Flow With Uniform Heat Flux on the Wall Under a Pair of Longitudinal Vortex Generators Mounted on the Bottom Wall

[+] Author and Article Information
Qiang Zhang

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Lanzhou Jiaotong University,
Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China;
Key Laboratory of Railway Vehicle
Thermal Engineering,
Lanzhou Jiaotong University,
Ministry of Education,
Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
e-mail: zhangqiang@mail.lzjtu.cn

Liang-Bi Wang

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Lanzhou Jiaotong University,
Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China;
Key Laboratory of Railway Vehicle
Thermal Engineering,
Lanzhou Jiaotong University,
Ministry of Education,
Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
e-mail: lbwang@mail.lzjtu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER. Manuscript received August 28, 2016; final manuscript received May 20, 2017; published online July 25, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Jim A. Liburdy.

J. Heat Transfer 139(12), 121701 (Jul 25, 2017) (15 pages) Paper No: HT-16-1538; doi: 10.1115/1.4037080 History: Received August 28, 2016; Revised May 20, 2017

To find the reasons of heat transfer enhancement of a laminar convective heat transfer process in a channel at a uniform heat flux boundary when a pair of longitudinal vortex generators (VGs) is mounted on the bottom wall, the laminar convective heat transfer process in the channel is investigated numerically in a frame built up by the convective transport equation of the heat flux. The results show that longitudinal vortices greatly increase the local convection contribution terms that determine the local intensity of the convective transport of the heat flux component in the span direction, and that the increased local contribution terms intensify the local convective transport of the heat flux component in the same direction. This process increases the convection contribution terms that determine the convective transports of the heat flux components in the main stream direction and in the normal direction of the channel walls. The increase in these convection contribution terms results in an enhancement of the convective heat transfer ability on the channel walls, and then, the heat transfer is enhanced by longitudinal vortices. When the span-averaged characteristic is numerically counted, longitudinal vortices are found to have no contribution on the span-averaged convective transport of the heat flux in the span direction.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Eibeck, P. A. , and Eaton, J. K. , 1986, “ The Effects of Longitudinal Vortices Embedded in a Turbulent Boundary Layer on Momentum and Thermal Transport,” Eighth International Heat Transfer Conference, San Francisco, CA, Aug. 17–22, pp. 1115–1120.
Eibeck, P. A. , and Eaton, J. K. , 1987, “ Heat Transfer Effects of a Longitudinal Vortex Embedded in a Turbulent Boundary Layer,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 109(1), pp. 16–24. [CrossRef]
Russell, C. M. B. , 1986, “ The Development of a High Performance Heat Transfer Surface,” Eighth International Heat Transfer Conference, San Francisco, CA, Aug. 17–22, pp. 843–855.
Pauley, W. R. , and Eaton, J. K. , 1987, “ The Effect of Embedded Longitudinal Vortex Pairs on Turbulent Boundary Layer Heat Transfer,” Report No. DOE/ER/13081-T2.
Tiggebeck, S. , Mitra, N. K. , and Fiebig, M. , 1994, “ Comparison of Wing-Type Vortex Generators for Heat Transfer Enhancement in Channel Flows,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 116(4), pp. 880–885. [CrossRef]
Fiebig, M. , Kallweit, P. , and Mitra, N. K. , 1986, “ Wing Type Vortex Generators for Heat Transfer Enhancement,” Eighth International Heat Transfer Conference, San Francisco, CA, Aug. 17–22, pp. 2909–2913.
Jang, J. Y. , Hsu, L. F. , and Leu, J. S. , 2013, “ Optimization of the Span Angle and Location of Vortex Generators in a Plate-Fin and Tube Heat Exchanger,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 67, pp. 432–444. [CrossRef]
Wang, Q. , Chen, Q. , Wang, L. , Zeng, M. , Huang, Y. , and Xiao, Z. , 2007, “ Experimental Study of Heat Transfer Enhancement in Narrow Rectangular Channel With Longitudinal Vortex Generators,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 237(7), pp. 686–693. [CrossRef]
Wu, J. M. , and Tao, W. Q. , 2008, “ Numerical Study on Laminar Convection Heat Transfer in a Channel With Longitudinal Vortex Generator—Part B: Parametric Study of Major Influence Factors,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 51(13–14), pp. 3683–3692. [CrossRef]
Ke, F. , Wang, L. B. , Hua, L. , Gao, S. D. , and Su, Y. X. , 2006, “ The Optimum Angle of Attack of Delta Winglet Vortex Generators on Heat Transfer Performance of Finned Flat Tube Bank With Considering Nonuniform Fin Temperature,” Exp. Heat Transfer, 19(3), pp. 224–238. [CrossRef]
Gao, S. D. , Wang, L. B. , Zhang, Y. H. , and Ke, F. , 2003, “ The Optimum Height of Winglet Vortex Generators Mounted on Three-Row Flat Tube Bank Fin,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 125(6), pp. 1007–1016. [CrossRef]
Didarul, I. M. , Kenyu, O. , Minoru, Y. , and Izuru, S., 2007, “ Study on Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow Characteristics With Short Rectangular Plate Fin of Different Pattern,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 31(4), pp. 367–379. [CrossRef]
Wang, L. B. , Yang, L. F. , Lin, Z. M. , Dong, Y. X. , Liu, S. , and Zhang, Y. H. , 2009, “ Comparisons of Performances of a Flat Tube Bank Fin Model Mounted Vortex Generators and the Real Heat Exchanger,” Exp. Heat Transfer, 22(3), pp. 198–215. [CrossRef]
Song, K. W. , and Wang, L. B. , 2013, “ The Effectiveness of Secondary Flow Produced by Vortex Generators Mounted on Both Surfaces of the Fin to Enhance Heat Transfer in a Flat Tube Bank Fin Heat Exchanger,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 153(4), p. 041902.
Wang, L. B. , Li, X. X. , Lin, Z. M. , Yang, X. , and Wang, X. H. , 2009, “ Additional Description of Laminar Heat Convection in Tube With Uniform Wall Temperature,” J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer, 23(1), pp. 200–205. [CrossRef]
Wang, L. B. , Zhang, Q. , and Li, X. X. , 2009, “ The Role of Velocity Gradient in Laminar Convective Heat Transfer Through a Tube With Uniform Wall Heat Flux,” Eur. J. Phys., 30(4), pp. 823–833. [CrossRef]
Wang, L. B. , Lin, Z. M. , Wu, X. , and Song, K. W. , 2010, “ Differences Between Laminar Convections Through Parallel Plain Planes With Uniform Wall Temperature and Heat Flux in Terms of Process Parameter,” Sci. China: Technol. Sci., 53(3), pp. 789–799.
Wang, L. B. , Lin, Z. , Hong, M. , Song, K. W. , and Wu, X. , 2010, “ Numerical Studying the Characteristics of Convective Transport of Heat Fluxes in Laminar Flow Through a Square Duct With Uniform Wall Temperature,” Comput. Therm. Sci., 2(5), pp. 439–454. [CrossRef]
Wang, L. B. , Huang, K. , Zhang, Y. H. , Yang, X. , and Wu, X. , 2010, “ A Way to Explain the Thermal Boundary Effects on Laminar Convection Through a Square Duct,” Front. Energy Power Eng. China, 4(4), pp. 496–506. [CrossRef]
Wang, Y. , and Wang, L. B. , 2012, “ The Reason That Fluid Flow Dissipates the Same Energy But Obtains Different Convective Heat Transfer Intensity,” J. Enhanced Heat Transfer, 19(1), pp. 25–41. [CrossRef]
Patankar, S. V. , 1980, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Hemisphere Publishing, New York, pp. 330–351.
Lin, Z. M. , and Wang, L. B. , 2014, “ A Multi-Domain Coupled Numerical Method for a Flat Tube Bank Fin Heat Exchanger With Delta-Winglet Vortex Generators,” Numer. Heat Transfer Appl., 65(12), pp. 1204–1229. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic view of studied model: (a) the studied channel, (b) the computational domain, (c) position of y = B/6, y = B/3, y = B/2, and (d) position of y = B/2, x = x1, x = x2, x = x3, x = x4, and four inspected lines

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic view of the grid system used in simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Velocity fields on the sections for the cases with VGs and without VGs: (a) and (e) x = 0.015 m, (b) and (f) x = 0.019 m, (c) and (g) x = 0.024 m, (d) and (h) x = 0.032 m, (a)–(d) the case without VGs, and (e)–(h) the case with VGs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Streamlines on the sections for the cases with VGs and without VGs: (a) x = 0.015 m, (b) x = 0.019 m, (c) x = 0.024 m, and (d) x = 0.032 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of the velocity fields in the channels with and without VGs: (a) the channel without VGs, (b)–(d) the channels with VGs, (a) and (b) y = B/2, (c) y = B/3, and (d) y = B/6

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Nulocal on the top and the bottom surfaces: (a) the top surface for the case without VGs, (b) the bottom surface for the case with VGs, and (c) the top surface for the case with VGs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The distributions of Nulocal and Nulocal/Nulocal,plain on the intersection lines by the planes of y = B/6, y = B/3, y = B/2 and the planes of z = 0 and z = H: (a) Nulocal on the top surface, (b) Nulocal on the bottom surface, (c) Nulocal/Nulocal,plain on the top surface, and (d) Nulocal/Nulocal,plain on the bottom surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The distribution of Nus and Nus/Nus,plain along the x direction: (a) Nus and (b) Nus/Nus,plain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

We-xT, Wc-xT, (We-x + Wc-x)/ΔT and qxT along the intersection lines of y = B/2 and x = x1, x2, x3, x4 in cases with VG and without VG: (a) We-xT, (b) Wc-xT, (c) (We-x + Wc-x)/ΔT, and (d) qxT

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

We-yT, Wc-yT, (We-y + Wc-y)/ΔT and qyT along the intersection lines of y = B/2 and x = x1, x2, x3, x4 in the cases with VGs and without VGs: (a) We-yT, (b) Wc-yT, (c) (We-y + Wc-y)/ΔT, and (d) qyT

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

We-zT, Wc-zT, (We-z + Wc-z)/ΔT and qzT along the intersection lines of y = B/2 and x = x1, x2, x3, x4 in the cases with VG and without VG: (a) We-zT, (b) Wc-zT, (c) (We-z + Wc-z)/ΔT, and (d) qzT

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

SWe-xT, SWc-xT, S(We-x + Wc-x)/ΔT and SqxT along the z-direction at the different x in the cases with VG and without VG: (a) SWe-xT, (b) SWc-xT, (c) S(We-x + Wc-x)/ΔT, and (d) SqxT

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

SWe-yT, SWc-yT, S(We-y + Wc-y)/ΔT and SqyT along the y-direction at the different x in the cases with VG and without VG: (a) SWe-yT, (b) SWc-yT, (c) S(We-y + Wc-y)/ΔT, and (d) SqyT

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

SWe-zT, SWc-zT, S(We-z + Wc-z)/ΔT and SqzT along the z-direction at the different x in the cases with VG and without VG: (a) SWe-zT, (b) SWc-zT, (c) S(We-z + Wc-z)/ΔT, and (d)SqzT

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In