Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
NARROW
Date
Availability
1-3 of 3
Fluid mechanics
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
Scott B. Fiveland, Shriram Vijayaraghavan, Shaoping Shi, Steven W. Richardson, Michael H. McMillian, Joel D. Hiltner
Proc. ASME. ICEF2010, ASME 2010 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference, 999-1007, September 12–15, 2010
Paper No: ICEF2010-35109
Abstract
End-gas detonation occurs in a spark-ignited engine when the advancing flame front compresses the end-gas mixture to its autoignition temperature. The rapid energy release results in shock waves which are undesirable due to resulting combustion noise and boundary layer breakdown leading to reduced engine performance and incipient engine damage. In a spark-ignited engine, end-gas knock can result from improper combinations of compression ratio, spark timing or inlet thermodynamic conditions (i.e. manifold temperature, pressure, and equivalence ratio). These variables exhibit very complex interactions, which require costly high dimensional experimental designs for proper evaluation. As a result, detailed modeling tools are needed to predict the onset of the end-gas detonation regime for engine design applications. Developing a solver to predict the end-gas detonation of gases ahead of the flame front in an operating engine is not trivial. In theory, the model would need to simultaneously resolve both the detailed fluid mechanics as well as describe the fuel decomposition using detailed chemistry. Calculations for this type can take weeks or months depending on the number of dimensions that are resolved. Since hundreds of computations may be necessary to optimize a given configuration, it is necessary to be able to not only compute the onset of auto-ignition and other parameters accurately, but efficiently. The objective of this work was to develop an efficient methodology that could be utilized to effectively predict detonation in an internal combustion spark-ignited engine. This paper presents the computational methodology, a review of the combustion tool capability, and a comparison to experiments. The work clearly demonstrates the existence of inhomogeneities in the temperature field and discusses their impact on the prediction of end-gas knock.
Proceedings Papers
Proc. ASME. ICEF2010, ASME 2010 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference, 33-40, September 12–15, 2010
Paper No: ICEF2010-35058
Abstract
Laser ignition is a potential ignition technology to achieve reliable lean burn ignition in high brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) internal combustion engines. The technology has the potential to increase brake thermal efficiency and reduce exhaust emissions. This submission reports on engine testing of a Caterpillar G3516C stationary natural gas fueled engine with three types of ignition approaches: i) non-fueled electric prechamber plug with electrodes at the base of the prechamber (i.e., conventional ignition), ii) non-fueled laser prechamber plug with laser spark in the middle of the prechamber, and iii) open chamber plug with laser spark in the main chamber. In the second configuration, a stock non-fueled prechamber plug was modified to incorporate a sapphire window and a focusing lens to form a laser prechamber plug. A 1064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser was used to create laser sparks. For these tests, a single cylinder of the engine was retrofitted with the laser plug while the remaining cylinders were run with conventional electric ignition system at baseline ignition timing of 24 degree before Top Dead Center (BTDC). The performances of the three plugs were compared in terms of Indicated Mean Effective Pressures (IMEP), Mass Burn Fraction Duration and Coefficient of Variation (COV) of IMEP, and COV of Peak Pressure Location. Test data show comparable performance between electric and laser prechamber plugs, albeit with a lower degree of variability in engine’s performance for electric prechamber plug compared to the laser prechamber plug. The open chamber plug exhibited poorer variability in engine performance. All results are discussed in the context of prechamber and engine fluid mechanics.
Proceedings Papers
Proc. ASME. ICEF2004, ASME 2004 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference, 763-772, October 24–27, 2004
Paper No: ICEF2004-0884
Abstract
We present theoretical models to simulate spark discharge and ignition. Two models are presented. The first model considers simplified fluid mechanics with chemistry effects. The second model utilizes more sophisticated flow with no chemistry. The simplified model incorporates physical models of breakdown and chemical kinetics of combustion with species and energy equations solved using a control volume method. A three-step mechanism is used to simulate chemical kinetics for fuel combustion and nitrogen chemistry. Dissociation and ionization in the plasma are included by assuming local thermal equilibrium. The second model simulates a spark discharge in air with more complete physics of flow using a high order numerical method, which shows the evolution of the shock wave and a torus-like plasma kernel.