RESEARCH PAPERS: Model Development

A New Low Reynolds Stress Transport Model for Heat Transfer and Fluid in Engineering Applications

[+] Author and Article Information
Rongguang Jia

 Fluent Inc., Lebanon, NH

Bengt Sundén1

Division of Heat Transfer, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund 22100, SwedenBengt.Sunden@vok.lth.se

Mohammad Faghri

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI


Corresponding author.

J. Heat Transfer 129(4), 434-440 (Aug 09, 2006) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2709957 History: Received March 01, 2006; Revised August 09, 2006

A new Reynolds stress transport model (RSTM) aimed for engineering applications is proposed with consideration of near-wall turbulence. This model employs the Speziale, Sarkar, and Gatski (SSG) pressure strain term, the ω equation, and the shear stress transport (SST) model for the shear stresses at the near-wall region (say, y+<30). The models are selected based on the following merits: The SSG RSTM model performs well in the fully turbulent region and does not need the wall normal vectors; the ω equation can be integrated down to the wall without damping functions. The SST model is a proper two-equation model that performs well for flows with adverse pressure gradient, while most two-equation models can have a good prediction of the shear stresses. A function is selected for the blending of the RSTM and SST. Three cases are presented to show the performance of the present model: (i) fully developed channel flow with Reτ=395, (ii) backward-facing step with an expansion ratio of 1.2 and Re=5200 base on the step height, and (iii) circular impingement with the nozzle-to-wall distance H=4D and Re=20,000. It is believed that the new model has good applicability for complex flow fields.

Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Predicted streamlines by the SSG-W model for the backward-facing-step case

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

u′u′¯ comparison between experiments and the present simulations: (a) V2F and (b) SSG-SST

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Line plot comparisons between experiments and the present simulations (legend as in Fig. 1): (a) u′u′¯ and (b) v′v′¯

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Predicted Nusselt number in comparison to experiments

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Plot of the blending function Fb

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Computational geometry: (a) topology and (b) grid around the step

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Streamlines for the backward-facing-step case: (a) DNS and (b) SSG-SST note: (a) and (b) are scaled the same

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Friction coefficient of the backward-facing-step case

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

U-velocity profile of the channel flow case

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Reynolds stresses of the channel flow case: (a) normal stresses and (b) shear stress

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Inlet profiles of the impingement jet case: (a) geometry, (b) grid and TKE contours around the jet inlet, and (c) inlet profiles

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Comparison between the present solver and FLUENT with the V2F model for the impingement jet case: (a) TKE contours and (b) Nusselt number

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

V-velocity comparison between experiments and present simulations (circle: PIV experiments, solid line: SSG-SST model, dashed line: V2F model, and dashed-dotted line: SST model): (a) V contours and (b) V line plots (note: the strictly horizontal lines are axes)



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In