Research Papers: Experimental Techniques

Novel Two-Dimensional Transient Heat Conduction Calculation in a Cooled Rotor: Ventilation Preheating—Blow-Down Flux

[+] Author and Article Information
J. P. Solano, G. Paniagua

Department of Turbomachinery and Propulsion, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Chaussée de Waterloo, 72 B1640 Rhode-Saint-Genèse, Belgium

J. Heat Transfer 131(8), 081601 (Jun 03, 2009) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3122777 History: Received September 16, 2008; Revised January 13, 2009; Published June 03, 2009

This contribution presents an alternative to classical data reduction techniques to measure the heat transfer using thin-film gauges. A finite-element model of the two-dimensional unsteady heat conduction equation is solved in the cross-sectional area of a metallic airfoil bounded with a polyamide sheet on which thermal sensors are deposited. This novel methodology allows capturing all 2D heat conduction effects that are irremediably neglected with the 1D data reduction technique. The application of this technique in a compression tube facility allows an exact evaluation of the initial wall heat flux into cooled rotor blades. During the spinning-up period, the rotor is spun up to nearly its nominal speed (from 0 rpm to 6200 rpm) resulting in preheating due to drag losses. The long duration of this experiment (450s) and the magnitude of the wall temperature increase result in significant 2D conduction effects that are not accounted for using the 1D approach. In addition, short-duration experiments confirm the existence of 2D effects at smaller time scales (0.5s), as well as the influence of the initial nonuniform temperature distribution in the rotor blade. The resulting flux with such an initial condition appears to be the superposition of the wall heat flux at the end of the spinning up before the test and the flux due to the blow-down itself.

Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

(a) Comparison of two approaches for the computation of wall heat flux distribution: global computation and superposition of separate solutions and (b) relative error of the superposition procedure with respect to the global computation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

(a) Wall heat flux evolution in the leading edge during the pretest rotation and (b) temperature distribution inside the leading edge substrate at the end of the pretest rotation (tr=450 s)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

(a) Wall heat flux evolution during a 1D blow-down for different initial temperature distributions and (b) shifted temperature profiles at the end of the pretest rotation and blow-down processes

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Thin-film gauges at 15% rotor blade height

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Meridional view of the turbine facility

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Typical testing sequence

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Two-layered substrate thin-film gauges

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

(a) Temperature distribution at the end of the turbine pretest rotation (tr=450 s) and (b) parabolic fitting of the temperature evolution during the pretest rotation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Temperature field in the cross-sectional area of the two-layered rotor blade at tr=450 s

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Wall heat flux distribution at the end of the nonuniform analytical blow-down (tf=0.5 s) versus initial wall heat flux distribution (tr=450 s)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Temperature history decomposition

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Computational domain for the 1D approach

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

FEM mesh of the two-layered rotor blade

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Analytical temperature evolution and wall heat flux reconstruction under 1D semi-infinite assumptions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

(a) Temperature field in the cross-sectional area of the two-layered rotor blade at tf=0.5 s, (b) wall heat flux evolution in four control points, and (c) temperature profile in the four control locations at tf=0.5 s

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

(a) Wall heat flux distribution at tf=0.5 s in the rotor blade submitted to uniform 1D boundary conditions and (b) local error distribution with respect to expected 1D solution

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 17

(a) Experimental wall heat flux computation for uniform and nonuniform initial temperature distributions and (b) local error distribution referenced to uniform initial conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 18

(a) Wall heat flux computation with two approaches: 2D and 1D and (b) local error distribution referenced to 1D results

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 19

(a) Wall heat flux computed with 2D approach and 1D approach corrected with Buttsworth and Jones’ (15) analytical expressions and (b) local error distribution referenced to 1D corrected results



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In