Research Papers: Forced Convection

Effect of Local Magnetic Fields on Electrically Conducting Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer

[+] Author and Article Information
Hulin Huang

e-mail: hlhuang@nuaa.edu.cn
Academy of Frontier Science,
Nanjing University of Aeronautics
and Astronautics, Nanjing, 210016, PRC

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Heat Transfer. Manuscript received November 1, 2011; final manuscript received July 2, 2012; published online December 28, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Sujoy Kumar Saha.

J. Heat Transfer 135(2), 021702 (Dec 28, 2012) (8 pages) Paper No: HT-11-1492; doi: 10.1115/1.4007413 History: Received November 01, 2011; Revised July 02, 2012

The prediction of electrically conducting fluid past a localized zone of applied magnetic field is the key for many practical applications. In this paper, the characteristics of flow and heat transfer (HI) for a liquid metal in a rectangular duct under a local magnetic field are investigated numerically using a three-dimensional model and the impact of some parameters, such as constrainment factor, κ, interaction parameter, N, and Reynolds number, Re, is also discussed. It is found that, in the range of Reynolds number 100 ≤ Re ≤ 900, the flow structures can be classified into the following four typical categories: no vortices, one pair of magnetic vortices, three pairs of vortices and vortex shedding. The simulation results indicate that the local heterogeneous magnetic field can enhance the wall-heat transfer and the maximum value of the overall increment of HI is about 13.6%. Moreover, the pressure drop penalty (ΔPpenalty) does not increasingly depend on the N for constant κ and Re. Thus, the high overall increment of HI can be obtained when the vortex shedding occurs.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Jha, B. K., and Apere, C. A., 2012, “Magnetohydrodynamic Transient Free-Convective Flow in a Vertical Annulus With Thermal Boundary Condition of the Second Kind,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 134, p. 042502. [CrossRef]
Kunstreich, S., 2003, “Electromagnetic Stirring for Continuous Casting—Part 1,” Int. J. Metallurgy, 100, pp. 395–408. [CrossRef]
Ali, F. M., Nazar, R., Arifin, N. M., and Pop, I., 2011, “MHD Mixed Convection Boundary Layer Flow Toward a Stagnation Point on a Vertical Surface With Induced Magnetic Field,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 133, p. 022502. [CrossRef]
Thess, A., Votyakov, E. V., and Kolesnikov, Y., 2006, “Lorentz Force Velocimetry,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, p. 164501. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kenjeres, S., Ten Cate, S., and Voesenek, C. J., 2011, “Vortical Structures and Turbulent Bursts Behind Magnetic Obstacles in Transitional Flow Regimes,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 32, pp. 510–528. [CrossRef]
Cuevas, S., Smolentsev, S., and Abdou, M., 2006, “On the Flow Past a Magnetic Obstacle,” J. Fluid Mech., 553, pp. 227–252. [CrossRef]
Hussam, W. K., Thompson, M. C., and Sheard, G. J., 2011, “Dynamics and Heat Transfer in a Quasi-Two-Dimensional MHD Flow Past a Circular Cylinder in a Duct at High Hartmann Number,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 54, pp. 1091–1100. [CrossRef]
Shercliff, J. A., 1962, The Theory of Electromagnetic Flow-Measurement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Roberts, P. H., 1967, An Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics, Longmans, Green, London.
Moreau, R., 1990, Magnetohydrodynamics, Kluwer, Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
Ni, M. J., Munipalli, R., Morley, N. B., Huang, P., and Abdou, M. A., 2007, “A Current Density Conservative Scheme for Incompressible MHD Flows at a Low Magnetic Reynolds Number. Part I: On a Rectangular Collocated Grid System,” J. Comput. Phys., 227, pp. 174–204. [CrossRef]
Cuevas, S., Smolentsev, S., and Abdou, M., 2006, “Vorticity Generation in Creeping Flow Past a Magnetic Obstacle,” Phys. Rev. E, 74, p. 056301. [CrossRef]
Votyakov, E. V., Kolesnikov, Y., Andreev, O., Zienicke, E., and Thess, A., 2007, “Structure of the Wake of a Magnetic Obstacle,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, p. 144504. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Votyakov, E. V., Zienicke, E., and Kolesnikov, Y. B., 2008, “Constrained Flow Around a Magnetic Obstacle,” J. Fluid Mech., 610, pp. 131–156. [CrossRef]
Andreev, O., Kolesnikov, Y., and Thess, A., 2007, “Experimental Study of Liquid Metal Channel Flow Under the Influence of a Nonuniform Magnetic Field,” Phys. Fluids, 19, p. 039902. [CrossRef]
Votyakov, E. V., and Kassinos, S. C., 2009, “On the Analogy Between Streamlined Magnetic and Solid Obstacles,” Phys. Fluids, 21, p. 097102. [CrossRef]
Burr, U., Barleon, L., Muller, U., and Tsinober, A., 2000, “Turbulent Transport of Momentum and Heat in Magnetohydrodynamic Rectangular Duct Flow With Strong Sidewall Jets,” J. Fluid Mech., 406, pp. 247–279. [CrossRef]
Yoon, H. S., Chun, H. H., Ha, M. Y., and Lee, H. G., 2004, “A Numerical Study on the Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer Around a Circular Cylinder in an Aligned Magnetic Field,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 47, pp. 4075–4087. [CrossRef]
Huang, H. L., Ying, A., and Abdou, M. A., 2002, “3D MHD Free Surface Fluid Flow Simulation Based on Magnetic-Feld Induction Equations,” Fusion Eng. Des., 63-64, pp. 361–368. [CrossRef]
Huang, H. L., and Zhou, X. M., 2009, “The Impact of Normal Magnetic Fields on Instability of Thermocapillary Convection in a Two-Layer Fluid System,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 131, p. 062502. [CrossRef]
Huang, H. L., and Li, B., 2011, “Heat Transfer Enhancement of MHD Flow by Conducting Strips on the Insulating Wall,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 133, p. 021902. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison of the streamwise velocity along the centreline (z = 0, y = 0). Case I—Re = 100, N = 4; Case II—Re = 100, N = 11.25; and Case III—Re= 400, N = 11.25. Dashed vertical lines indicate borders of the magnetic obstacle.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic representation of the system under investigation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Structure of the wake of a solid (a) and magnetic obstacles (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Local Nu/Nu0 distribution over the heated wall at N = 9 and κ = 0.2. (a) Different Re, (b) Re = 900.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Instantaneous temperature contours on z = 0 plane at N = 9, Re = 900, and κ = 0.2. Light and gray shading shows hot and cold fluid, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Streamwise (ux) and spanwise (uy) velocities along the spanwise cuts in z = 0 plane for N = 9 and Re = 100. (a) and (b) x = −3, (c) and (d) x = 0.4, (e) and (f) x = 3.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Local Nu/Nu0 distribution under different κ (a) and N (b) at Re = 100

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Local fc/fc0 distribution under different κ (a) and N (b) at Re = 100

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Overall increment of the heat transfer and pressure drop penalty vary with κ (a) and N (b) at Re = 100

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The instantaneous velocity ux (a) and uy (b) along the centreline (y = z = 0) vary with Re at N = 9 and κ = 0.2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Mass flow streamlines on z = 0 plane at N = 9 and κ = 0.2, (a) Re = 100 and (b) Re = 400

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Instantaneous mass flow streamlines on z = 0 plane at N = 9, Re = 900 and κ = 0.2. (a) t = 2643.84, (b) t = 2646.9, (c) t = 2649.96, and (d) t = 2653.02.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Time traces (a) and the power spectral density function (b) of the uy at monitoring point P

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Overall increment of the heat transfer and pressure drop penalty vary with Re



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In