Research Papers: Forced Convection

Dissimilarity of Turbulent Fluxes of Momentum and Heat in Perturbed Turbulent Flows

[+] Author and Article Information
H. D. Pasinato

Department of Chemical Engineering,
FRN, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional,
Avda. P. Rotter s/n,
8318 Plaza Huincul, Argentina
e-mail: hpasinato@frn.utn.edu.ar

Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER. Manuscript received June 20, 2012; final manuscript received December 28, 2012; published online April 11, 2013. Assoc. Editor: W. Q. Tao.

J. Heat Transfer 135(5), 051701 (Apr 11, 2013) (12 pages) Paper No: HT-12-1297; doi: 10.1115/1.4023358 History: Received June 20, 2012; Revised December 28, 2012

The dissimilarity between the Reynolds stresses and the heat fluxes in perturbed turbulent channel and plane Couette flows was studied using direct numerical simulation. The results demonstrate that the majority of the dissimilarity was due to the difference between the wall-normal fluxes, while the difference between the streamwise fluxes was lower. The main causes for the dissimilarity were the production terms, followed by the velocity-pressure interaction terms. Further insights into the importance of the velocity-pressure interaction in the origin of the dissimilarity are provided using two-point correlation. Furthermore, an octant conditional averaged dataset reveals that not only the wall-normal heat flux but also the streamwise heat flux is strongly related to the wall-normal gradient of the mean temperature. A simple Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) heat flux model is proposed as a function of the Reynolds stresses. A comparison of the direct numerical simulation data with an “a priori” prediction suggests that this simple model performs reasonably well.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Launder, B. E., 1978, “Heat and Mass Transport,” Turbulence Topics in Applied Physics, Vol. 12, 2nd ed., P.Bradshaw, ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 231–287.
Daly, B. J., and Harlow, F. H., 1970, “Transport Equations in Turbulence,” Phys. Fluids, 13(11), pp. 2634–2639. [CrossRef]
Kim, J., and Moin, P., 1989, “Transport of Passive Scalar in a Turbulent Channel Flow,” Turbulent Shear Flow, Vol. 6, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 86–96.
Roger, M. M., Mansur, N. N., and Reynolds, W. C., 1989, “An Algebraic Model for the Turbulent Flux of a Passive Scalar,” J. Fluid Mech., 203, pp. 77–101. [CrossRef]
Abe, K., and Suga, K., 2000, “Towards the Development of a Reynolds-Averaged Algebraic Turbulent Scalar-Flux Model,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 22, pp. 19–29. [CrossRef]
Kestin, J., and Richardson, P. D., 1963, “Heat Transfer Across Turbulent Incompressible Boundary Layers,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 6, pp. 147–189. [CrossRef]
Fulachier, L., and Dumas, R., 1976, “Spectral Analogy Between Temperature and Velocity Fluctuations in a Turbulent Boundary Layer,” J. Fluid Mech., 77, pp. 257–277. [CrossRef]
Antonia, R. A., Krishnamoorthy, L. V., and Fulachier, L., 1987, “Correlation Between the Longitudinal Velocity Fluctuation and Temperature Fluctuation in the Near-Wall Region of a Turbulent Boundary Layer,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 31(4), pp. 723–730. [CrossRef]
Suzuki, H., Suzuki, K., and Sato, T., 1988, “Dissimilarity Between Heat and Mass Transfer in a Turbulent Boundary Layer Disturbed by a Cylinder,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 31(2), pp. 259–265. [CrossRef]
Kong, H., Choi, H., and Lee, J. S., 2001, “Dissimilarity Between the Velocity and Temperature Fields in a Perturbed Turbulent Thermal Boundary Layer,” Phys. Fluids, 13(5), pp. 1466–1479. [CrossRef]
Pasinato, H. D., 2011, “Velocity and Temperature Dissimilarity in Fully Developed Turbulent Channel and Plane Couette Flows,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 32, pp. 11–25. [CrossRef]
Pasinato, H. D., 2007, “Velocity and Temperature Natural Dissimilarity in a Turbulent Channel Flow,” Mecánica Computacional, Vol. 26, S.Elaskar, E.Pilotta, and G.Torres, eds., pp. 3644–3663.
Pasinato, H. D., 2008, “Turbulent Scalar Transport Mechanism and Velocity-Temperature Natural Dissimilarity in a Turbulent Plane Couette Flow,” Mecánica Computacional, Vol. 27, A.Cardona, M.Storti, and C.Zuppa, eds., pp. 1619–1636.
Leonard, B. P., 1979, “A Stable and Accurate Convective Modeling Procedure Based on Quadratic Upstream Interpolation,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 19, pp. 59–98. [CrossRef]
Hinze, J., 1975, Turbulence, McGraw Hill, New York.
Kim, H. T., Kline, S. J., and Reynolds, W. C., 1971, “The Production of Turbulence Near a Smooth Wall in a Turbulent Boundary Layer,” J. Fluid Mech., 56, pp. 133–159. [CrossRef]
Wallace, J. M., Eckelmann, H., and Brodkey, R. S., 1972, “The Wall Region in Turbulent Shear Flow,” J. Fluid Mech., 54, pp. 39–48. [CrossRef]
Rossi, R., and Iaccarino, G., 2009, “Numerical Simulation of Scalar Dispersion Downstream of a Square Obstacle Using Gradient-Transport Type Models,” Atmos. Environ., 43(16), pp. 2518–2531. [CrossRef]
Pasinato, H. D., 2012, “Wall-Layer Turbulent Heat Transfer Modeling for Perturbed Flows,” Mecánica Computacional, Vol. 31, A.Cardona, P.Khoan, R.Quinteros, and M.Storti, eds., pp. 2059–2073.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Φ balance for perturbed channel flow for y+≃38, cases (a) CHB6220; (b) CHS6220; (c) CHABR220; and (d) CHFBR220. Solid line, DΦ/Dt; – – –, diffusion; filled stars, turbulent fluxes; □·□·□, (Sm-Se) as in Eq. (4); °·°·°, balance. Note the different scales. Solid vertical lines denote the slot location, vertical dotted lines denote sections W+ and 5W+ from the slot.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Idem to Figs. 3(a)3(d) for perturbed Couette flow, cases (a) CFB6590; (b) CFS590; (c) CFABR590; and (d) CFFBR590. Note the different scales.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Budget of (a)–(c)〈φu〉 and (b)–(d)〈φv〉 balances at y+ = 38 for (a)–(b) channel flow perturbed with blowing and (c)–(d) Couette flow perturbed with an APGS. °·°·°, balance; solid line, D(φu)/Dt and D(φv)/Dt; – – –, diffusion; ⋆·⋆·⋆, production; •·•·•, turbulent transport; –. –. –, dissipation; □·□·□, velocity-pressure interaction. Note the different scales.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

(a)–(a)〈u∂p/∂x〉; (a)-(b)〈θ∂p/∂x〉; (b)-(a)〈v∂p/∂x〉; and (b)–(b)〈v∂p/∂y〉 for channel flow perturbed with blowing. Solid line, on the slot; –. –. –, W+ and,., 5W+ downstream from the slot; °·°·°, nonperturbed flow (note the shift in the abscissa for plots (a)–(b) and (b)–(a)).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Total (open symbol) and in (Q2 + Q4) (filled symbol) of (a)〈v∂p/∂x〉 and (b)〈v∂p/∂y〉 for channel flow perturbed with blowing, at y+ equal to 5, 16, 38, and 137 from the wall. Squares, on the slot; diamonds, W+; stars, 5W+ downstream from the slot; circles, nonperturbed flow.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

(a) Instantaneous pressure field; (b) two-point correlation for 〈v∂p/∂x〉; and (c) 〈v∂p/∂y〉, for channel flow perturbed with blowing, for quadrant Q4 at (rx+,y+) plane (rz+=0). Contour levels are for: (a) range (–0.50; 0.14), increments 0.1; (b)–(c) (–0.10; 0.05), 0.01. Solid line, positive and dotted line, negative. Dots denote detection point at W+ from slot and at y+=38 from the wall.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Contribution of (a) ∂(〈uu〉-〈θu〉)/∂x and (b) ∂(〈uv〉-〈θv〉)/∂y to DΦ/Dt for four positions from the wall for channel flow perturbed with blowing. Solid line, y+≃5; –. –. –, y+≃18; □·□·□, y+≃38; °·°·°, y+≃137. Note the different scales.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

U (filled symbols) and Θ (open symbols) for (a) channel and (b) Couette flow, perturbed with blowing ((a)–(a) and (b)–(a)) and an APGS ((a)–(b) and (b)–(b)), at two different locations: (squares) on the slot; (stars) at W+ downstream from the slot. Open and filled circles U and Θ for nonperturbed flow, respectively. Solid line, law of the wall, (1/041)ln(y+) + 50. Note the shift for APGS.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

(a)〈uθ〉oct/〈uθ〉 and (b)〈vθ〉oct/〈vθ〉 for channel flow perturbed with blowing, on the slot ((a)–(a); (b)–(a)), at W+ downstream ((a)–(b); (b)–(b)), and at 5W+ downstream ((a)–(c); (b)–(c)). Open diamonds Q11;u>0,v>0,θ>0; filled diamonds Q12;u>0,v>0,θ<0; open squares Q22;u<0,v>0,θ<0; filled squares Q21;u<0,v>0,θ>0; open stars Q32;u<0,v<0,θ<0; filled stars Q31;u<0,v<0,θ>0; open circles Q41;u>0,v<0,θ>0; filled circles Q42;u>0,v<0,θ<0.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

(a) θrms/urms and (b) (∂Θ/∂y)/(∂U/∂y) for channel flow perturbed with blowing. Filled circles developed values; °·°·°, on the slot; □·□·□, W+; ⋆·⋆·⋆, 5W+ downstream.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Reynolds stress 〈uu〉 and 〈uv〉; solid line, on the slot; – – –, W+; –. –. –, 5W+, and a prior comparison of RANS model with DNS data for turbulent heat fluxes 〈uθ〉 and 〈vθ〉, for channel flow perturbed with (a) blowing and (b) an APGS. Open symbols, DNS data; filled symbols, a priori RANS prediction. Squares, on the slot; diamonds, W+; stars, 5W+ downstream; °·°·°, nonperturbed values of turbulent heat fluxes.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Scheme of parallel DNS for a numerical experiment of perturbed turbulent flow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Contribution to differences 〈φu〉 and 〈φv〉 by turbulence production for channel flow perturbed with an APGS at y+=38. ⋆·⋆·⋆, total; solid line, function of mean-field dissimilarity; – – –, function of turbulence dissimilarity.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In