To minimize the coordination efforts among design teams and expedite the design process via parallel workflows, a cooperative and decentralized environment is often considered for team-based design. The cooperative environment implies that teams are motivated to achieve the common objective of the design, while the decentralized environment encourages teams to work independently. Due to the nature of the decentralized environment, achieving an optimal solution is not trivial, even though all teams are motivated and willing to do so. In this context, this paper introduces the Lagrangian relaxation approach for solving decentralized design problems. Also, an objective adjustment factor is proposed to improve the convergence of the solution process. Two examples, welded beam design and heat exchanger design, have been used to illustrate and validate the Lagrangian relaxation approach and the objective adjustment factor.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: lisimon@ciise.concordia.ca
Article navigation
March 2010
Research Papers
Lagrangian Relaxation Approach for Decentralized Decision Making in Engineering Design
Simon Li
Simon Li
Assistant Professor
Concordia Institute for Information Systems Engineering,
e-mail: lisimon@ciise.concordia.ca
Concordia University
, Montreal, Quebec H3G !MB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Simon Li
Assistant Professor
Concordia Institute for Information Systems Engineering,
Concordia University
, Montreal, Quebec H3G !MB, Canadae-mail: lisimon@ciise.concordia.ca
J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. Mar 2010, 10(1): 011001 (12 pages)
Published Online: February 12, 2010
Article history
Received:
October 3, 2008
Revised:
June 3, 2009
Online:
February 12, 2010
Published:
February 12, 2010
Citation
Li, S. (February 12, 2010). "Lagrangian Relaxation Approach for Decentralized Decision Making in Engineering Design." ASME. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. March 2010; 10(1): 011001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3290763
Download citation file:
155
Views
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Putting The Ghost In The Machine: Emulating Cognitive Style in Large Language Models
J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng
Epsilon-Greedy Thompson Sampling to Bayesian Optimization
J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng
Deep Learning-Driven Analysis of a Six-Bar Mechanism for Personalized Gait Rehabilitation
J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng
Related Articles
On Rationality in Engineering Design
J. Mech. Des (November,2004)
A Fuzzy Dynamic Programming Approach for the Mixed-Discrete Optimization of Mechanical Systems
J. Mech. Des (November,2005)
A Formal Approach to Handling Conflicts in Multiattribute Group Decision Making
J. Mech. Des (July,2006)
Sustainable Design?
J. Mech. Des (September,2010)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Better Decisions
Total Quality Development: A Step by Step Guide to World Class Concurrent Engineering
Multiobjective Decision-Making Using Physical Programming
Decision Making in Engineering Design
Why Do We Avoid Conflict?
Conflict Resolution: Concepts and Practice (The Technical Manager's Survival Guides)