Part II of this paper proposes the use of optimal preview control with integral action for a maglev vehicle with a superconducting electromagnetic suspension system operating on an elevated, flexible guide-way. The control system is designed based on a linearized model and then applied to a full-scale nonlinear simulation model of the maglev vehicle, magnet modules, and guideway (derived in Part I—Vehicle, Guideway, and Magnet Modeling). Simulation studies demonstrate the effectiveness of the controller and evaluate the vehicle performance under the influences of guideway flexibility, guideway irregularities, and aerodynamic disturbances.

1.
Anderson, B. D. O., and Moore, J. B., 1990, Optimal Control: Linear Quadratic Methods, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
2.
Bender
E. K.
,
1968
, “
Optimum Linear Preview Control With Application to Vehicle Suspension
,”
ASME Journal of Basic Engineering
, Vol.
90
, No.
2
, pp.
213
221
.
3.
Bryson, A. E. and Ho, Y., 1969, Applied Optimal Control: Optimization, Estimation, and Control, Blaisdell Publishing, Waltham, MA.
4.
Fujioka
T.
, and
Yamada
H.
,
1996
, “
Preview Control of Active Suspension for Railway Vehicles
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division
, DSC. Vol.
58
, pp.
149
156
.
5.
Garg
D. P.
, and
Barrows
T. M.
,
1981
, “
Modeling and Dynamic Response of Maglev Vehicles Subjected to Crosswind Gusts
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL
, Vol.
103
, pp.
251
258
.
6.
Hac´
A.
,
1992
, “
Optimal Linear Preview Control of Active Vehicle Suspension
,”
Vehicle System Dynamics
, Vol.
21
, pp.
167
195
.
7.
Heinrich, K. and Kretzschmar, R. eds., 1989, Transrapid Maglev System, Hestra-Verlag, Dramstadt.
8.
ISO, 1978, “Guide for the Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration,” ISO Standard 2631, International Organization for Standardization.
9.
Jezequel
L.
, and
Roberti
V.
,
1996
, “
Optimal Preview Semiactive Suspension
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL
, Vol.
118
, Mar., pp.
99
105
.
10.
Katz, R. M., Nene, V. D., Ravera, R. J., and Skalski, C. A., 1974, “Performance of Magnetic Suspensions for High Speed Vehicles Operating Over Flexible Guideways,” ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL, June, pp. 204–212.
11.
Kortu¨m
W.
, and
Utzt
A.
,
1984
, “
Control Law Design and Dynamic Evaluations for a Maglev Vehicle With a Combined Lift and Guidance Suspension System
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL
, Vol.
106
pp.
286
292
.
12.
Langlois
R. G.
, and
Anderson
R. J.
,
1995
, “
Preview Control Algorithms for the Active Suspension of an Off-Road Vehicle
,”
Vehicle System Dynamics
, Vol.
24
, pp.
65
97
.
13.
Louam
N.
,
Wilson
D. A.
, and
Sharp
R. S.
,
1992
, “
Optimization and Performance Enhancement of Active Suspensions for Automobiles under Preview of the Road
,”
Vehicle System Dynamics
, Vol.
21
, pp.
39
63
.
14.
Peng
H.
, and
Tomizuka
M.
,
1993
, “
Preview Control for Vehicle Lateral Guidance in Highway Automation
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL
, Vol.
115
, pp.
679
686
.
15.
Snyder, J. E., and Wormley, D. N., 1977, “Dynamic Interactions Between Vehicles and Elevated, Flexible Randomly Irregular Guideways,” ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL, Mar., pp. 23–33.
16.
Tomizuka
M.
,
1976
, “
Optimal Linear Preview Control With Application to Vehicle Suspension—Revisited
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL
, Vol.
98
, No.
3
, pp.
309
315
.
17.
Wang, S. K., 1995, “Levitation and Guidance of a Maglev Vehicle Using Optimal Preview Control,” Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, May.
18.
Wormley, D. N., Thornton, R. D., Yu, S.-H., and Cheng, S., 1992, “Interactions Between Magnetically Levitated Vehicles and Elevated Guideway Structures,” U.S. Department of Transportation Technical Report DOT/FRA/NMI-92/23.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.