This paper describes the use of realistic analytical techniques to address automotive ride control. Multibody system (MBS) modeling techniques were used to develop a full vehicle model with suspension system representation, which was subsequently validated against experimental data. The resultant multivariable ride control problem was then decoupled in the frequency domain by the application of equivalence transformation techniques. It is shown that diagonalization can be achieved for the range of primary ride frequencies, and that the decoupled system then consists of three single-input/single-output (SISO) systems, one for each of the sprung mass modes. Finally, feedback control design for each sprung mass mode loop is illustrated by the application of modal damping.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Topics:
Modeling, Multibody systems, Vehicles, Damping, Design, Feedback, Suspension systems
1.
Abdel Hady
M. B. A.
, and
Crolla
D. A.
,
1989
, “
Theoretical Analysis of Active Suspension Performance Using a Four-Wheel Model
,”
Proc. IMechE
, Vol.
203
, pp.
125
–
135
.
2.
“ACSL Reference Manual,” MGA Software, Concord MA 01742.
3.
Barak, P., and Hrovat, D., 1988, “Application of the LQG Approach to Design of an Automotive Suspension for Three-Dimensional Vehicle Models,” Proceedings of IMechE International Conference on Advanced Suspensions, London, Oct, pp. 11–26.
4.
Cherry, A. S., 1992, “An Investigation of Multibody System Modelling and Control Analysis Techniques for the Development of Advanced Suspension Systems in Passenger Cars,” PhD thesis, University of Warwick, Coventry, U.K.
5.
Cherry, A. S., Costa, A. N., and Jones, R. P., 1995, “MBS Modelling, Non-Linear Simulation and Linear Analysis Techniques for Integrated Vehicle Control,” Proceedings of IFAC Workshop on Advances in Automotive Control, Ascona, Mar., pp. 76–81.
6.
Costa, A. N., 1991, “Application of Multibody System (MBS) Techniques to Automotive Vehicle Chassis Simulation for Motion Control Studies,” PhD thesis, University of Warwick, Coventry, U.K.
7.
Hac
A.
,
1985
, “
Suspension Optimization of a 2-D of Vehicle Model Using a Stochastic Optimal Control Technique
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
, Vol.
100
, pp.
343
–
357
.
8.
Kane, T. R., and Likins, P. W., 1983, Spacecraft Dynamics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
9.
Maciejowski, J. M., 1989, Multivariable Feedback Design, Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, U.K.
10.
Malek, K. M., and Hedrick, J. K., 1985, “Decoupled Active Suspension Design for Improved Automotive Ride Quality/Handling Performance,” Proceedings of 9th IAVSD Symposium on the Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and on Tracks, Linkoping, June, pp. 383–398.
11.
Margolis
D. L.
,
1982
, “
Semi-Active Heave and Pitch Control for Ground Vehicles
,”
Vehicle System Dynamics
, Vol.
16
, pp.
167
–
192
.
12.
MATLAB: User’s Guide, The MathWorks, Natick, MA 01760-1500
13.
Metz
D.
, and
Maddock
J.
,
1986
, “
Optimal Ride Height and Pitch Control for Championship Race Cars
,”
Automatica
, Vol.
22
, pp.
509
–
520
.
14.
Owens, D. H., 1978, Feedback and Multivariable Systems, Peter Peregrinus, Stevenage, U.K.
15.
SD/FAST User’s Manual, Symbolic Dynamics, Mountain View, CA 94941.
16.
Potter, T. E. C., Cherry, A. S., and Jones, R. P., 1996, “Modelling and simulation of an automotive vehicle for integrated motion control,” Proceedings of International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control, Aachen, June, pp. 471–484.
17.
Robson
J. D.
,
1979
, “
Road Surface Description and Vehicle Response
,”
Int. J. of Vehicle Design
, Vol.
1
, pp.
25
–
35
.
18.
Styles
D. D.
, and
Dodds
C. J.
,
1976
, “
Simulation of Random Environments for Structural Dynamics Testing
,”
Experimental Mechanics
, Vol.
16
, pp.
416
–
424
.
19.
Wilson
D. A.
,
Sharp
R. S.
, and
Hassan
S. A.
,
1986
, “
The Application of Linear Optimal Control Theory to the Design of Active Automotive Suspension
,”
Vehicle System Dynamics
, Vol.
15
, pp.
105
–
118
.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1999
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.