This paper presents a relative gain array (RGA) analysis of a simulated solid oxide fuel cell/gas turbine plant, based on a multivariate empirical formulation of a 300 kW hybrid system. The HyPer test facility at the National Energy Technology Laboratory, served as the test bed for deriving frequency response data and subsequent multivariable model of a direct-fired, recuperated hybrid cycle plant. Through the modulation of various airflow bypass valves, magnitude and phase data are used to formulate transfer function (TF) equations that describe input/output system interaction. A frequency dependent RGA calculation of the empirical TF matrix provides a means of quantifying the degree of coupling between system inputs and outputs for the configuration studied. Various input/output interaction time scales are obtained to identify frequencies where fully developed system coupling occur. Analysis of the RGA matrix leads to a better understanding of the inherent properties and the hybrid configuration, and can serve as a validating tool to existing analytical RGA calculations of similar types of hybrids.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Keywords:
fuel cell power plants, gas turbine power stations, hybrid power systems, solid oxide fuel cells, transfer function matrices
Topics:
Air flow, Frequency response, Gas turbines, Solid oxide fuel cells, Transfer functions, Valves, Fuel cells, Signals, Flow (Dynamics), Cycles, Test facilities
1.
Tucker
,
D.
, and
Liese
,
E.
, 2003, “
Fuel Cell Gas Turbine Hybrid Simulation Facility Design
,”
ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
, New Orleans, LA.
2.
Skogestad
,
S.
, and
Postlethwaite
,
I.
, 2005,
Multivariable Feedback Control, Analysis and Design
, 2nd ed.,
Wiley
,
New York
.
3.
Torkel
,
G.
, and
Ljung
,
L.
, 2000,
Control Theory, Multivariable and Nonlinear Methods
,
Taylor and Francis
,
London
.
4.
Bristol
,
E. H.
, 1966, “
On a New Measure of Interaction for Multivariable Process Control
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
0018-9286,
11
, pp.
133
–
134
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
5.
Kariwala
,
V.
, and
Hovd
,
M.
, 2006, “
Relative Gain Array: Common Misconceptions and Clarifications
,”
Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Computer Process Control
, Lake Louise, Canada.
6.
Häggblom
,
K. E.
, 1997, “
Partial Relative Gain: A New Tool for Control Structure Selection
,”
Proceedings of the AIChE Annual Meeting
, Nov. 16–21, Los Angeles, CA.
7.
Tucker
,
D.
,
Lawson
,
L.
, and
Gemmen
,
R.
, 2005, “
Characterization of Air Flow Management and Control in a Fuel Cell Turbine Hybrid Power System Using Hardware Simulation
,” ASME Paper No. PWR2005-50127.
8.
Katsuhiko
,
O.
, 2002,
Modern Control Engineering
, 4th ed.,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
9.
Morgans
,
A.
, and
Dowling
,
A.
, 2005, “
Model Based Control of Combustion Instabilities
,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68897.
10.
Tsai
,
A.
,
Banta
,
L.
,
Tucker
,
D.
, and
Lawson
,
L.
, 2007, “
Determination of an Empirical Transfer Function of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Gas Turbine Hybrid System Via Frequency Response Analysis
,” ASME Paper No. FuelCell2007-25099.
11.
Tsai
,
A.
, 2007, “
Multivariable Robust Control of a Simulated Hybrid Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Gas Turbine Plant
,” Ph.D. thesis, West Virginia University, Faculty of Engineering and Mineral Resources.
12.
Tsai
,
A.
,
Banta
,
L.
,
Tucker
,
D.
, and
Gemmen
,
R.
, 2008, “
Multivariable Robust Control of a Simulated Hybrid Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Gas Turbine Plant
,” ASME Paper No. FuelCell2008-65071.
Copyright © 2010
 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.