Deep-well drilling costs can be reduced substantially by using higher mud pump pressures. This has been demonstrated during the drilling of 1267 m (4166 ft) of 12 1/4-in. and 8 1/2-in. hole with a land rig, using pump pressures approaching 35 MPa (5000 psi) over a period of six weeks. Drilling costs were reduced by 25 percent (approximately $134,000) in the test well as a result of the higher pressures. The tests used drilling bits which combined mechanical and jet action, viz., extended-nozzle bits and a diamond bit designed to withstand the increased mud velocities. Both types of bits gave significantly improved performance when used at the higher pressure. Further tests were made with standard downhole turbines driving conventional bits. Improved performance was achieved at the higher pressure, provided the correct bit was selected for the formation encountered. In these cases the increase in penetration rate was due to the higher mechanical power developed by the turbine rather than increased jet action at the bit. Of the four turbine runs, two were found to be more economic than rotary runs made in similar formations in the reference well. The high-pressure mud pumps and other conventional equipment used in the tests performed well at the 35 MPa (5000 psi) pump pressure. Two standard triplex mud pumps were provided with fluid ends of an Exxon Production Research design and manufactured in Germany under Shell supervision. No failures occurred during six months of operation and in general, the equipment performed with the same downtime at the high pressure as the conventional equipment used in the reference well at the usual operating pressure (21 MPa (3000 psi)).
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 1979
Research Papers
Higher Pump Pressures Can Reduce Drilling Costs
A. J. R. Van Strijp,
A. J. R. Van Strijp
Koninklijke/Shell Exploratie en Produktie Laboratorium, Rijswijk, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
R. Feenstra
R. Feenstra
Koninklijke/Shell Exploratie en Produktie Laboratorium, Rijswijk, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
A. J. R. Van Strijp
Koninklijke/Shell Exploratie en Produktie Laboratorium, Rijswijk, The Netherlands
R. Feenstra
Koninklijke/Shell Exploratie en Produktie Laboratorium, Rijswijk, The Netherlands
J. Energy Resour. Technol. Mar 1979, 101(1): 59-65 (7 pages)
Published Online: March 1, 1979
Article history
Received:
December 11, 1978
Online:
August 19, 2010
Citation
Van Strijp, A. J. R., and Feenstra, R. (March 1, 1979). "Higher Pump Pressures Can Reduce Drilling Costs." ASME. J. Energy Resour. Technol. March 1979; 101(1): 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3446863
Download citation file:
12
Views
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Fuel Consumption Prediction in Dual-Fuel Low-Speed Marine Engines With Low-Pressure Gas Injection
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December 2024)
A Semi-Analytical Rate-Transient Analysis Model for Fractured Horizontal Well in Tight Reservoirs Under Multiphase Flow Conditions
J. Energy Resour. Technol (November 2024)
Experimental Investigation of New Combustion Chamber Geometry Modification on Engine Performance, Emission, and Cylinder Liner Microstructure for a Diesel Engine
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December 2024)
Downdraft Gasification for Biogas Production: The Role of Artificial Intelligence
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December 2024)
Related Articles
Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics of a Closed Blade Cascade Wind Tunnel for Organic Vapors
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (May,2016)
Design, Fabrication, and Characterization of a Micro Vapor-Jet Vacuum Pump
J. Fluids Eng (October,2007)
Simulations of the Unsteady Flow Through the Fastrac Supersonic Turbine
J. Turbomach (April,2000)
Advanced Geothermal Wellbore Hydraulics Model
J. Energy Resour. Technol (September,2000)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Adding Surface While Minimizing Downtime
Heat Exchanger Engineering Techniques
Openings
Guidebook for the Design of ASME Section VIII Pressure Vessels, Third Edition
Section VIII: Division 2—Alternative Rules
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 2, Second Edition: Criteria and Commentary on Select Aspects of the Boiler & Pressure Vessel and Piping Codes