The in-situ deformability of rocks and the state-of-stress must be known for the analysis and design of surface and underground structures. This paper presents a method for determining the in-situ deformability of rock-masses using friction gages. Friction gages utilize the friction between the gage and the rock surface for detecting the strain changes. The method involves impressing friction gages on two opposite quadrants of the borehole wall, then radially loading the other two quadrants over 45-deg contact with a self-equilibrating pair of forces of sufficient magnitude to initiate and propagate tensile fractures. While loading, the friction gages detect the tangential strains on the borehole wall before, during and after fracturing of the rock. From the linear portion of the tangential stress-strain data, the elastic properties of the rock can be determined using the appropriate relationships. Furthermore, from the failure and post-failure portions of the tangential stress-strain data the tensile strength of the rock-mass and the in-situ state-of-stress can also be estimated. The theoretical basis of the method, and the fabrication, calibration and testing of the friction gage system, are described. Furthermore, practical field applications of the method are given.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 1990
Research Papers
Friction Gages for In-Situ Rock-Mass Deformability and Stress Measurements
M. G. Karfakis
M. G. Karfakis
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Mining and Minerals Engineering Department, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Search for other works by this author on:
M. G. Karfakis
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Mining and Minerals Engineering Department, Blacksburg, VA 24061
J. Energy Resour. Technol. Mar 1990, 112(1): 62-68 (7 pages)
Published Online: March 1, 1990
Article history
Received:
May 15, 1989
Revised:
October 9, 1989
Online:
April 16, 2008
Citation
Karfakis, M. G. (March 1, 1990). "Friction Gages for In-Situ Rock-Mass Deformability and Stress Measurements." ASME. J. Energy Resour. Technol. March 1990; 112(1): 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2905714
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
Shear Strength of a Thermal Barrier Coating Parallel to the Bond Coat
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (January,1998)
Optimizing Ultrasonic Additive Manufactured Al 3003 Properties With Statistical Modeling
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (January,2012)
Mechanism Maps for Frictional Attachment Between Fibrillar Surfaces
J. Appl. Mech (May,2009)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Section VIII: Division 2–Alternative Rules
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 2, Sixth Edition
Introduction and Definitions
Handbook on Stiffness & Damping in Mechanical Design
Section III: Subsections NC and ND — Class 2 and 3 Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Fourth Edition