The control system performance of gas liquid cylindrical cyclone (GLCC©) separators can be considerably improved by adopting suitable control strategy and optimizing the design of the controller PID settings. Dynamic simulators have been developed in this study, based on Matlab/Simulink® software for evaluation of several different GLCC control philosophies for two-phase flow metering loop and bulk separation applications. Detailed analysis of the GLCC control system simulators indicates that for integrated liquid level and pressure control strategy, the level control loop compliments the operation of the pressure control loop, and vice versa. This strategy is ideal for reducing the pressure fluctuations in the GLCC. At severe slugging conditions, the integrated liquid level control is more desirable because of its faster response. However, there is no control of the GLCC pressure fluctuations. The results also show that the simulators are capable of representing the dynamic behavior of real physical systems. [S0195-0738(00)00504-5]

1.
Kouba, G. E., and Shoham, O., 1996, “A Review of Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone (GLCC) Technology,” presented at the International Conference, Production Separation Systems, Aberdeen, Scotland, April 23–24.
2.
Gomez, L. E., 1998, “A State-of-the-Art Simulator and Field Application Design of Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Separators,” M.S. thesis, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK.
3.
Mohan
,
R.
,
Wang
,
S.
,
Shoham
,
O.
, and
Kouba
,
G.
,
1998
, “
Design and Performance of Passive Control System for Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Separators
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
120
, Mar., pp.
49
55
.
4.
Wang, S., Mohan, R., Shoham, O., and Kouba, G., 1998, “Dynamic Simulation and Control System Design of Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Separators,” SPE 49175, presented at the SPE 73rd Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, September 27–30.
5.
Wang, S., Mohan, R., Shoham, O., Marrelli, J., and Kouba, G., 2000, “Performance Improvement of Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Separators Using Integrated Level and Pressure Control Systems,” presented at ASME ETCE/OMAE 2000, New Orleans, LA, February 14–17.
6.
Kolpak, M. M., 1994, “Passive Level Control in Two-Phase Separator,” internal communication, Arco Exploration and Production Technology.
7.
Genceli, H., Kuenhold, K., Shoham, O., and Brill, J. P., 1988, “Dynamic Simulation of Slug Catcher Behavior,” presented at the SPE 63rd Annual Meeting, Houston, TX, October 2–5.
8.
Roy, S., and Smith, C., 1995, “Better Than Averaging Level Control,” University of South Florida, in Tech.
9.
Galichet, S., Foulloy, L., Chebre, M., and Beauchene, J. P., 1994, “Fuzzy Logic Control of a Floating Level in a Refinery Tank,” Proc., 1994 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 1538–1542.
10.
Fisher Controls, 1996, Product Catalog, USA.
You do not currently have access to this content.