A detailed investigation of the flow physics occurring on the suction side of a simulated low pressure turbine (LPT) blade was performed. A contoured upper wall was designed to simulate the pressure distribution of an actual LPT blade onto a flat plate. The experiments were carried out at Reynolds numbers of 100,000 and 250,000 with three levels of freestream turbulence. The main emphasis in this paper is placed on flow field surveys performed at a Reynolds number of 100,000 with levels of freestream turbulence ranging from 0.8 percent to 3 percent. Smoke-wire flow visualization data were used to confirm that the boundary layer was separated and formed a bubble. The transition process over the separated flow region is observed to be similar to a laminar free shear layer flow with the formation of a large coherent eddy structure. For each condition, the locations defining the separation bubble were determined by careful examination of pressure and mean velocity profile data. Transition onset location and length determined from intermittency profiles decrease as freestream turbulence levels increase. Additionally, the length and height of the laminar separation bubbles were observed to be inversely proportional to the levels of freestream turbulence. [S0098-2202(00)00701-X]

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
gas turbines, boundary layers, flow visualisation, flow separation, laminar to turbulent transitions, bubbles, flow simulation
Topics:
Boundary layers, Bubbles, Flow (Dynamics), Flow visualization, Pressure, Reynolds number, Separation (Technology), Turbines, Turbulence, Blades
1.
Gardner, W. B., 1981, “Energy Efficient Engine Low Pressure Turbine Boundary Layer Program Technology Report,” NASA CR-165338.
2.
Halstead, D. E., Wisler, D. C., Okiishi, T. H., Walker, G. J., Hodson, H. P., and Shin, H., 1995, “Boundary Layer Development in Axial Compressors and Turbines, Part 3 of 4: LP Turbines,” Proc. ASME 40th International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress & Exposition, Houston, TX, June 5–8, 1995, ASME Paper No. 95-GT-463.
3.
Morin, B. L., and Patrick, W. P., 1991, “Detailed Studies of a Large-Scale Laminar Separation Bubble on a Flat Plate: Volume 1-Experimental Technique, Summarized Results, and Discussion,” UTRC Report No. R91-956786-1.
4.
Suder, K. L., O’Brien, J. E., and Reshotko, E., 1988, “Experimental Study of Bypass Transition in a Boundary Layer,” NASA Report No. TM-100913.
5.
McFarland
,
E. R.
,
1982
, “
Solution of Plane Cascade Flow Using Improved Surface Singularity Methods
,”
J. Eng. Power
,
104
, pp.
668
–
674
.
6.
Shyne, R. J., 1998, “Experimental Study of Boundary Layer Behavior in a Simulated Low Pressure Turbine,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toledo, NASA Report No. TM 1998-208503.
7.
Yavuzkurt
,
S.
,
1984
, “
A Guide to Uncertainty Analysis of Hot-Wire Data
,”
J. Fluids Eng.
,
106
, pp.
181
–
186
.
8.
Sohn, K. H., and Reshotko, E., 1991, “Experimental Study of Boundary Layer Transition with Elevated Freestream Turbulence on a Heated Flat Plate,” NASA Report No. CR-187068.
9.
Klebanoff, P. S., 1955, “Characteristics of Turbulence in a Boundary Layer with Zero Pressure Gradient,” NACA Report No. 1247.
10.
Gaster, M., 1969, “The Structure and Behavior of Laminar Separation Bubbles,” A.R.C. R&M Report No. 3595.
11.
Roberts
,
W. B.
,
1980
, “
Calculation of Laminar Separation Bubbles and Their Effect on Airfoil Performance
”
AIAA J.
,
18
, pp.
25
–
30
.
12.
Davis, R. L., Carter, J. E., and Reshotko, E., 1985, “Analysis of Transitional Separation Bubbles on Infinite Swept Wings,” Proc. AIAA 18th Fluid Dynamics and Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, Cincinnati, OH, July 16–18, Reno, NV, AIAA Paper No. AIAA-85-1685.
Copyright © 2000
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.