This work presents the development of a data reduction algorithm for non-nulling, multihole pressure probes in compressible, subsonic flowfields. The algorithm is able to reduce data from any 5- or 7-hole probe and generate very accurate predictions of the velocity magnitude and direction, total and static pressures, Mach and Reynolds number and fluid properties like the density and viscosity. The algorithm utilizes a database of calibration data and a local least-squares interpolation technique. It has been tested on four novel miniature 7-hole probes that have been calibrated at NASA Langley Flow Modeling and Control Branch for the entire subsonic regime. Each of the probes had a conical tip with diameter of 1.65 mm. Excellent prediction capabilities are demonstrated with maximum errors in angle prediction less than 0.6 degrees and maximum errors in velocity prediction less than 1 percent, both with 99 percent confidence.

1.
Kjelgaard, S. O., 1988, “Theoretical Derivation and Calibration Technique of a Hemispherical-Tipped, Five-Hole Probe,” NASA Technical Memorandum 4047.
2.
Bryer, D. W., and Pankhurst, R. C., 1971, “Pressure-Probe Methods for Determining Wind Speed and Flow Direction,” Her Majesty’s Stationary Office/National Physics Laboratory, The Campfield Press, St. Albans.
3.
Rediniotis, O. K., Hoang, N. T., and Telionis, D. P., 1993, “The Seven-Hole Probe: Its Calibration and Use,” Forum on Instructional Fluid Dynamics Experiments, 152, June, pp. 21–26.
4.
Zilliac, G. G., 1989, “Calibration of Seven-Hole Probes For Use in Fluid Flows With Large Angularity,” NASA Technical Memorandum 102200, Dec.
5.
Gerner, A. A., and Maurer, C. L., 1981, “Calibration of Seven-Hole Probes Suitable for High Angles in Subsonic Compressible Flows,” United States Air Force Academy-TR-81-4.
6.
Everett
,
K. N.
,
Gerner
,
A. A.
, and
Durston
,
D. A.
,
1983
, “
Seven-Hole Cone Probes for High Angle Flow Measurements: Theory and Calibration
,”
AIAA J.
21
, No.
7
, July, pp.
992
998
.
7.
Ames Research Staff, 1953, “Equations, Tables and Charts for Compressible Flow,” NACA Report 1135.
8.
Krause, L. K., and Dudzinski, T. J., 1969, “Flow Direction Measurement with Fixed Position Probes in Subsonic Flow over a Range of Reynolds Number,” Proceedings for 15th International Aerospace Symposium, Las Vegas, Nevada, pp. 217–223.
9.
Ainsworth
,
R. W.
,
Allen
,
J. L.
, and
Batt
,
J. J.
,
1995
, “
The Development of Fast Response Aerodynamic Probes for Flow Measurement in Turbomachinery
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
117
, pp
625
634
.
10.
Dominy
,
R. G.
, and
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
1993
, “
An Investigation of Factors Influencing the Calibration of Five-Hole Probes for Three Dimensional Flow Measurement
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
115
, July, pp.
513
519
.
11.
“Assessment of Wind Tunnel Data Uncertainty,” 1995, AIAA Standard S-071-1995.
12.
Moffat
,
R. J.
,
1982
, “
Contributions to the Theory of Single-Sample Uncertainty Analysis
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
104
, June, pp.
250
260
.
13.
Kline
,
S. J.
, and
McClintock
,
F. A.
,
1953
, “
Describing Uncertainties in Single-Sample Experiments
,”
Mech. Eng. (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.)
75
, Jan., pp
3
88
.
14.
Wenger, C., and Devenport, W., 1998, “A Seven-Hole Pressure Probe Measurement System and Calibration Method Utilizing Error Tables.” AIAA Paper No. 98-0202, 36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, Jan.
You do not currently have access to this content.