Two data-reduction methods were compared for the calibration of a seven-hole conical pressure probe in incompressible flow. The polynomial curve-fit method of Gallington and the direct-interpolation method of Zilliac were applied to the same set of calibration data, for a range of calibration grid spacings. The results showed that the choice of data-reduction method and the choice of calibration grid spacing each have an influence on the measurement uncertainty. At high flow angles, greater than 30 deg, where flow may separate from the leeward side of the probe, the direct-interpolation method was preferable. At low flow angles, less than 30 deg, where flow remains attached about the probe, neither data-reduction method had any advantage. For both methods, a calibration grid with a maximum interval of 10 deg was recommended. The Reynolds-number sensitivity of the probe began at Re=5000, based on probe diameter, and was independent of the data-reduction method or calibration grid spacing.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2002
Additional Technical Papers
A Comparison of Data-Reduction Methods for a Seven-Hole Probe
David Sumner
David Sumner
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5A9 Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
David Sumner
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5A9 Canada
Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received by the Fluids Engineering Division May 22, 2000; revised manuscript received November 21, 2001. Associate Editor: J. Bridges.
J. Fluids Eng. Jun 2002, 124(2): 523-527 (5 pages)
Published Online: May 28, 2002
Article history
Received:
May 22, 2000
Revised:
November 21, 2001
Online:
May 28, 2002
Citation
Sumner, D. (May 28, 2002). "A Comparison of Data-Reduction Methods for a Seven-Hole Probe ." ASME. J. Fluids Eng. June 2002; 124(2): 523–527. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1455033
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
The Compressible Calibration of Miniature Multi-Hole Probes
J. Fluids Eng (March,2001)
Accelerating the Calibration of Multihole Pressure Probes by Applying Advanced Computational Methods
J. Turbomach (July,2005)
Near Wall Measurements for a Turbulent Impinging Slot Jet (Data Bank Contribution
J. Fluids Eng (March,2001)
An Improved Neural-Network-Based Calibration Method for Aerodynamic Pressure Probes
J. Fluids Eng (January,2003)
Related Chapters
Experimental Characterization of a Cavitating Orifice
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
Mechanical Measurements and Calibration
Metrology and Instrumentation: Practical Applications for Engineering and Manufacturing
Conclusions
Introduction to Finite Element, Boundary Element, and Meshless Methods: With Applications to Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow