This contribution addresses volute design as applied to single-blade-impeller pumps. Traditionally, volute design for multiblade impeller pumps has been carried out using either the constant-velocity or constant-swirl methodologies. Here, the constant velocity approach was investigated in order to determine whether or not it was appropriate for single-blade-impeller pumps, and whether the theoretical formulation would agree with numerically calculated data. In a numerical approach, three volutes were designed of the constant velocity type with design velocities of 0.8, 1.0, and 1.20 Cref. The performance of all three volutes was calculated using transient, three-dimensional, viscous numerical simulations, using the commercially available ANSYS CFX-11.0 code, over a range of flowrates 0.55<Qd<1.44. Analysis of the velocity distributions within the volutes was carried out by means of equispaced radially distributed planes on which the average circumferential velocity was calculated over full impeller rotations. The development of the initial constant velocity volute design (1.0 Cref) required the use of a somewhat arbitrary setting of the recirculation mass flowrate Qrc=0.35Qd. However in subsequent designs, a new iterative approach was developed, in which the velocity and mass flow distribution results from the numerical simulations were looped back into the design procedure, and an updated recirculation mass flowrate was obtained. These steps were then repeated until the desired constant velocity volute designs were obtained. The results of the investigation confirmed the strongly transient velocity pressure pulsation generated by the single blade impeller. When analyzed using average velocity measurements across an entire impeller revolution, clear agreement was seen between the velocity distributions predicted theoretically and calculated numerically for each of the constant velocity volutes. As expected, at flowrates above the dutypoint, the flow was seen to accelerate through the volute in all cases, while below the dutypoint, decelerating flow was observed. Examination of the hydraulic performance curves showed that an increase in the volute constant velocity design value led to a steeper head-flow curve. Further, increasing the design velocity provided for a higher overall hydraulic efficiency and a more peaked efficiency-flow curve.

1.
De Souza
,
B.
,
Niven
,
A.
, and
Daly
,
J.
, 2008, “
Single Blade Impeller Development Using the Design of Experiments Method in Combination With Numerical Simulation
,”
IMECHE J. Process Mechanical Engineering.
,
222
(
E3
), pp.
135
142
.
2.
Kaupert
,
K. A.
, and
Staubli
,
T.
, 1999, “
The Unsteady Pressure Field in a High Specific Speed Centrifugal Pump Impeller—Part 1: Influence of the Volute
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
121
, pp.
621
626
.
3.
González
,
J.
,
Fernandez
,
J.
,
Blanco
,
B.
, and
Santolaria
,
C.
, 2002, “
Numerical Simulation of the Dynamic Effects Due to Impeller-Volute Interaction in a Centrifugal Pump
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
124
(
2
), pp.
348
356
.
4.
Dong
,
R.
,
Chu
,
S.
, and
Katz
,
J.
, 1997, “
Effect of Modification to Tongue and Impeller Geometry on Unsteady Flow, Pressure Fluctuations and Noise in a Centrifugal Pump
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
119
, pp.
506
515
.
5.
Blanco
,
E.
,
Fernández
,
J.
,
González
,
J.
, and
Santolaria
,
C.
, 2000, “
Numerical Flow Simulation in a Centrifugal Pump With Impeller-Volute Interaction
,”
ASME
Paper No. ASME-FEDSM-00-11297.
6.
Benra
,
F. K.
, 2006, “
Numerical and Experimental Investigation on the Flow Induced Oscillations of a Single-Blade Pump Impeller
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
128
, pp.
783
794
.
7.
Stepanoff
,
A. J.
, 1957,
Centrifugal and Axial Flow Pumps: Theory, Design and Application
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
8.
Pfleiderer
,
C.
, 1955,
Die Kreiselpumpen für Flüssigkeiten und Gase, 4
,
Springer–Verlag
,
Berlin
.
9.
Gulich
,
J. F.
, 2007,
Centrifugal Pumps
,
Springer
,
New York
.
10.
Dawes
,
W. N.
,
Dhanasekaran
,
P. C.
,
Demargne
,
A. A.
,
Kellar
,
W. P.
, and
Savill
,
A. M.
, 2001, “
Reducing Bottlenecks in the CAD-to-Mesh-to-Solution Cycle Time to Allow CFD to Participate in Design
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
123
, pp.
552
557
.
11.
De Souza
,
B.
,
Daly
,
J.
,
Niven
,
A.
, and
Frawley
,
P.
, 2006, “
Hydraulic Performance of a Single Blade Impeller With Tipgap Clearance: Numerical Simulation Methodology
,”
WSEAS Trans. on Fluid Mech.
,
06
(
1
), pp.
671
678
.
12.
Daly
,
J.
,
De Souza
,
B.
,
Niven
,
A.
, and
Frawley
,
P.
, 2006, “
Numerical Simulation and Analysis of the Transient Flow and Head Distribution Through a Single Blade Centrifugal Impeller Pump
,”
WSEAS Trans. on Fluid Mech.
,
06
(
1
), pp.
678
686
.
13.
Byskov
,
R. K.
,
Jacobsen
,
C. B.
, and
Pederson
,
N.
, 2003, “
Flow in a Centrifugal Pump Impeller at Design and Off Design Conditions—Part 11: Large Eddy Simulation
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
125
, pp.
73
83
.
14.
Muggli
,
F. A.
,
Holbein
,
P.
, and
Dupont
,
P.
, 2002, “
CFD Calculation of a Mixed Flow Pump Characteristic From Shutoff to Maximum Flow
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
124
, pp.
798
802
.
15.
Majidi
,
K.
, 2005, “
Numerical Study of the Unsteady Flow in a Centrifugal Pump
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
127
(
2
), pp.
363
371
.
16.
Schachenmann
,
A.
,
Muggli
,
F.
, and
Guelich
,
J. F.
, 1993, “
Comparison of Three Navier-Stokes Codes With LDA-Measurements on an Industrial Radial Pump Impeller
,”
Pumping Machinery
, ASME FED Vol.
154
,
ASME
,
New York
, pp.
231
236
.
17.
Thakur
,
S.
,
Wanlai
,
L.
, and
Wright
,
J.
, 2002, “
Prediction of Flow in Centrifugal Blower Using Quasi-Steady Rotor-Stator Models
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
0733-9399,
128
, pp.
1039
1049
.
18.
Menter
,
F. R.
, 1994, “
Two-Equation Eddy Viscosity Models for Engineering Applications
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
32
(
8
), pp.
1598
1605
.
19.
Menter
,
F. R.
, and
Kuntz
,
M.
, 2003, “
Adaptation of Eddy Viscosity Turbulence Models to Unsteady Separated Flow Behind Vehicles
,”
Proceedings of the Conference on Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles: Trucks, Busses, and Trains
, Asilomar, CA.
20.
Lakshminarayana
,
B.
, 1995,
Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer of Turbomachinery
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
21.
Wulf
,
A.
,
Steberl
,
R.
, and
Akdag
,
V.
, 1999, “
Efficient Integration of CFD Into Product Design
,”
Proceedings of the Industrial Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference
, Von Karman Institute, Belgium.
22.
Esch
,
T.
, and
Menter
,
F. R.
, 2003, “
Heat Transfer Prediction Based on Two-Equation Turbulence Models With Advanced Wall Treatment
,”
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Heat and Mass Transfer
, Antalya, Turkey.
23.
ANSYS Inc.
, 2008,
ANSYS Best Practice Guidelines
,
ANSYS Inc.
,
Waterloo, Canada
.
24.
Benra
,
F. K.
,
Dohmen
,
H. J.
, and
Zwingenberg
,
M.
, 2006, “
Comparison of Experimental and Numerical Obtained Velocity Fields in a Single-Blade Centrifugal Pump
,”
ASME
Paper No. FEDSM 98351.
You do not currently have access to this content.